<?

if(!file_exists(dirname(__FILE__).'/site-sonar-config.php'))
{
	$SS_PASSWORD = 'site-sonar.com';
	$SS_DATABASE_FILENAME = dirname(__FILE__).'/logs.sqlite';
	$SS_PAGEVIEWS_LIMIT = -1;
	$SS_SESSION_FIELDS = '[contractorname] ([contractorid])';
	$SS_SCRIPT_PATH = '';
	$SS_SERVER_DATA = $_SESSION;
}
else
{
	include(dirname(__FILE__).'/site-sonar-config.php');
}

$action = isset($_GET['action']) ? $_GET['action'] : '';
$pswd = isset($_GET['pswd']) ? $_GET['pswd'] : '';
$fromid = isset($_GET['fromid']) ? $_GET['fromid'] : '';
$fromactivity = isset($_GET['fromactivity']) ? $_GET['fromactivity'] : '';


// ==================WRAP PDO SQLITE ===============
if(!function_exists('sqlite_open'))
{
	define('SQLITE_ASSOC', 1);
	define('SQLITE_NUM', 2);
	define('SQLITE_BOTH', 3);
	

	function sqlite_open($filename, $filemode, &$error)
	{
		try
		{
			$pdo = new PDO("sqlite:$filename");
			$pdo->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_TIMEOUT, 10);
			$pdo->exec("SELECT 0");
			return $pdo;
		}
		catch(Exception $exception)
		{
			try
			{
				$error = $exception;
				
				$pdo = new PDO("sqlite:$filename");
				$pdo->exec("SELECT 0");
				return $pdo;
			}
			catch(Exception $exception2)
			{
				$error = $exception2;
			}
		}
		
		return $pdo;
	}

	function sqlite_escape_string($sql)
	{
		$sql = str_replace("'", "''", $sql);
		return $sql;
	}
	
	function sqlite_exec($pdo, $sql, &$error)
	{
		$rowsaffected = $pdo->exec($sql);
		
		if($rowsaffected === FALSE)
		{
			$errorinfo = $pdo->errorInfo();
			$error = $errorinfo[2];
		}
	}
	
	function sqlite_query($pdo, $sql, $fetchtype = SQLITE_ASSOC, &$error = '')
	{
		$statement = $pdo->query($sql);
		
		if($statement === FALSE)
		{
			$errorinfo = $pdo->errorInfo();
			$error = $errorinfo[2];
		}
		
		if($fetchtype == SQLITE_NUM)
			$statement->setFetchMode(PDO::FETCH_NUM);
		else if($fetchtype == SQLITE_ASSOC)
			$statement->setFetchMode(PDO::FETCH_ASSOC);
		else if($fetchtype == SQLITE_BOTH)
			$statement->setFetchMode(PDO::FETCH_BOTH);
		
		return $statement;
	}
	
	function sqlite_fetch_array(&$statement)
	{
		$array = $statement->fetch();
		return $array;
	}
	
	function sqlite_fetch_single($statement)
	{
		$res = $statement->fetchColumn();
		
		return $res;
	}
	
	function sqlite_close($pdo)
	{
		unset($pdo);
	}
}

//======================== DETECT ===============================
if($action == 'detect')
{
	echo 'OK';
	exit();
}

//======================== CREATE DB ============================
if(!file_exists($SS_DATABASE_FILENAME))
{
	$error = '';
	$dbpointer = sqlite_open($SS_DATABASE_FILENAME, 0666, $error);
	if($error != '')
	{
		error_log("ERR 124: $error");
		return;
	}
	
	$error = '';
	sqlite_exec($dbpointer, 
			'CREATE TABLE pageview (
				id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ASC,
				fkbefore INTEGER,
				fkuser INTEGER,
				created DATETIME,
				url VARCHAR(400)
			);
			
			CREATE TABLE user (
				id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ASC,
				uid VARCHAR(200),
				activity DATETIME,
				created DATETIME,
				ip VARCHAR(15),
				sourceurl VARCHAR(400),
				user_agent VARCHAR(500),
				http_accept VARCHAR(500),
				language VARCHAR(5),
				resolution VARCHAR(15),
				colors VARCHAR(20),
				plugins TEXT,
				sessiondata TEXT
			);
			
			CREATE INDEX user_uid ON user(uid);
			CREATE INDEX user_user_agent ON user(user_agent);
			CREATE INDEX pageview_fkuser ON pageview(fkuser);
			CREATE INDEX pageview_created ON pageview(created);', 
			$error);
			
	if($error != '')
	{
		error_log("ERR 162: $error");
		return;
	}
}
else
{
	$error = '';
	$dbpointer = sqlite_open($SS_DATABASE_FILENAME, 0666, $error);
	
	if($error != '')
	{
		error_log("ERR 173: $error");
		return;
	}
}


//=============================== LOG =========================================
if($action == '' || $action == 'update')
{
	//retrieve values from _SERVER and _COOKIE
	$uid = isset($_COOKIE['SS_uid']) ? $_COOKIE['SS_uid'] : '';
	$url = sqlite_escape_string($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']);
	$ip = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
	$user_agent = sqlite_escape_string($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']);
	$http_accept = sqlite_escape_string($_SERVER['HTTP_ACCEPT']);
	$selfhost = isset($_SERVER['HTTP_HOST']) ? $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] : $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'];
	$sourceurl = isset($_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER']) ? sqlite_escape_string($_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER']) : '';
	
	$matches = array();
	if(preg_match_all("/\\[[A-Za-z0-9_]*\\]/i", $SS_SESSION_FIELDS, $matches) > 0)
	{
		$sessiondata = $SS_SESSION_FIELDS;
		$hasdata = FALSE;
		foreach($matches[0] as $match)
		{
			$matchkey = trim(trim($match, '['), ']');
			if(isset($SS_SERVER_DATA[$matchkey]) && ''.$SS_SERVER_DATA[$matchkey] != '')
			{
				$sessiondata = str_replace($match, $SS_SERVER_DATA[$matchkey], $sessiondata);
				$hasdata = TRUE;
			}
			else
				$sessiondata = str_replace($match, '', $sessiondata);
		}
		
		if(!$hasdata)
			$sessiondata = '';
	}
	
	$language = isset($_COOKIE['SS_language']) ? sqlite_escape_string($_COOKIE['SS_language']) : '';
	$resolution = isset($_COOKIE['SS_resolution']) ? sqlite_escape_string($_COOKIE['SS_resolution']) : '';
	$colors = isset($_COOKIE['SS_colors']) ? sqlite_escape_string($_COOKIE['SS_colors']) : '';
	$plugins = isset($_COOKIE['SS_plugins']) ? sqlite_escape_string($_COOKIE['SS_plugins']) : '';
	
	if($url != '/favicon.ico' && $url != '/robots.txt')
	{
		if(stripos($sourceurl, $selfhost) >= 5 && stripos($sourceurl, $selfhost) <= 11)
			$sourceurl = '';
		
		//merge bots
		if(''.$uid == '')
		{
			$botdefs = array('googlebot', 'yandexbot', 'bingbot', 'baiduspider', 'yahoo', 'mj12bot');
			foreach($botdefs as $botdef)
			{
				if(stripos('__'.$user_agent, $botdef) > 1)
				{
					$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, "SELECT uid FROM user WHERE user_agent = '$user_agent'", SQLITE_NUM, $error);
					$uid = ''.sqlite_fetch_single($res);
					unset($res);
					break;
				}
			}
		}
		
		//search for user
		if(''.$uid == '')
		{
			$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, "SELECT uid FROM user 
																WHERE 
																	user_agent = '$user_agent' AND
																	ip = '$ip' AND 
																	http_accept = '$http_accept' AND 
																	activity > date('now', 'localtime', '-10 hour')", 
															SQLITE_NUM, $error);
			if($error != '')
			{	
				error_log("ERR 249: $error");
				return;
			}
			
			$uid = ''.sqlite_fetch_single($res);
			unset($res);
		}
		
		//skip doubled pageview
		if(strlen($user_agent) > 2 && $url == '/' && ''.$sourceurl == '' && $http_accept == '*/*')
		{
			return;
		}
		
		//generate new one
		if(''.$uid == '')
		{
			$uid = sha1($ip.'|'.$user_agent.'|'.mt_rand(0x19A100, 0x39AA3FF));
		}
		
		$sessiondata = iconv("UTF-8", "Windows-1252", $sessiondata);
		$sourceurl = iconv("UTF-8", "Windows-1252", $sourceurl);
		$url = iconv("UTF-8", "Windows-1252", $url);
				
		if($action == 'update')
		{
			$sql = "UPDATE user SET
							ip = '$ip',
							language = CASE WHEN '$language' = '' THEN language ELSE '$language' END,
							resolution = CASE WHEN '$resolution' = '' THEN resolution ELSE '$resolution' END,
							colors = CASE WHEN '$colors' = '' THEN colors ELSE '$colors' END,
							plugins = CASE WHEN '$plugins' = '' THEN plugins ELSE '$plugins' END
						WHERE uid = '$uid'";
				
			$error = '';
			sqlite_exec($dbpointer, $sql, $error);
			if($error != '')
			{	
				error_log("ERR 286: $error");
				return;
			}
		}
		else
		{
			//check if user already exist
			$error = '';
			$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, "SELECT id FROM user WHERE uid = '$uid'", SQLITE_NUM, $error);
			$fkuser = ''.sqlite_fetch_single($res);
			unset($res);
			
			if($error != '')
			{
				error_log("ERR 299: $error");
				return;
			}
			
			if($fkuser == '')
			{
				//insert new user row.
				$sql = "INSERT INTO user (
							uid, 
							created,
							activity,
							ip,
							sourceurl,
							user_agent,
							http_accept,
							sessiondata,
							language,
							resolution,
							colors,
							plugins
						)
						VALUES (
							'$uid', 
							datetime('now', 'localtime'),
							datetime('now', 'localtime'),
							'$ip',
							'$sourceurl',
							'$user_agent',
							'$http_accept',
							'$sessiondata',
							'$language',
							'$resolution',
							'$colors',
							'$plugins'
						);";
						
				$error = '';
				sqlite_exec($dbpointer, $sql, $error);
				if($error != '')
				{
					error_log("ERR 339: $error");
					return;
				}
				
				$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, "SELECT last_insert_rowid()");
				$fkuser = ''.sqlite_fetch_single($res);
				unset($res);
			}
			else
			{
				$sql = "UPDATE user SET
							ip = '$ip',
							sessiondata = CASE 
															WHEN '$sessiondata' = '' THEN sessiondata 
															ELSE '$sessiondata' 
														END,
							http_accept = '$http_accept',
							activity = datetime('now', 'localtime'),
							sourceurl = CASE 
														WHEN sourceurl <> '' AND sourceurl IS NOT NULL THEN sourceurl
														WHEN ('$sourceurl' = '') THEN sourceurl 
														ELSE '$sourceurl' 
													END
							WHERE id = $fkuser";
				
				$error = '';
				sqlite_exec($dbpointer, $sql, $error);
				if($error != '')
				{
					error_log("ERR 367: $error");
					return;
				}
			}
			
			$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, "SELECT MAX(id) FROM pageview WHERE fkuser = $fkuser");
			$fkbefore = ''.sqlite_fetch_single($res);
			unset($res);
					
			if($fkbefore == '') $fkbefore = 'NULL';
				
			//insert pageview log
			$sql = "INSERT INTO pageview (
						fkuser, 
						fkbefore,
						created,
						url
					)
					VALUES (
						$fkuser, 
						$fkbefore,
						datetime('now', 'localtime'),
						'$url'
					);";
			
			$error = '';
			sqlite_exec($dbpointer, $sql, $error);
			if($error != '')
			{
				error_log("ERR 394: $error");
				return;
			}
		}
		
		//delete pageviews of bots older than 10 minutes
		$botnames = array('googlebot', 'bingbot', 'mj12bot', 'netsprint', 'baiduspider', 'yandexbot', 'ahrefsbot');
		foreach($botnames as $botname)
		{
			if(stripos('_'.$user_agent, $botname) > 1)
			{
				$sql = "DELETE FROM pageview WHERE uid = '$uid' AND created < datetime('now', 'localtime', '-10 minute')";
				sqlite_exec($dbpointer, $sql, $error);
				break;
			}
		}
		
		if($action != 'update')
		{
?><script type="text/javascript" >
    document.cookie = "SS_uid=;expires=Tue, 26 Jun 2029 04:23:16 GMT";<?
		//Use javascript to fill rest of values.
		if($language == '' && $resolution == '' && $colors == '' && $plugins == '' && $action != 'update')
		{
?>
function ssSetCookie(name, value) 
{
	if(navigator.cookieEnabled)
	{
		document.cookie = name + "=" + escape(value) + ";expires=Tue, 26 Jun 2029 04:23:16 GMT";
	}
}

(function() {

	var pgs = '';
	if(navigator.plugins)
	{
		for(var i=0; i<navigator.plugins.length; i++)
		{
			var pg = navigator.plugins[i];
			
			if(pg != null)
			{
				var pname = pg.name.toString();
				var pdescription = pg.description.toString().replace(pname, "");
				
				if(pgs.indexOf(';' + pname, 0) >= 0)
					continue;
				
				pgs += ';' + pname + '|' + pdescription;
			}
		}
	}
	
	ssSetCookie('SS_language', (window.navigator.language) ? window.navigator.language : window.navigator.userLanguage);
	ssSetCookie('SS_resolution', screen.width.toString() + 'x' + screen.height.toString());
	ssSetCookie('SS_colors', screen.colorDepth.toString());
	ssSetCookie('SS_plugins', pgs);

	var sa = document.createElement('script'); 
	sa.type = 'text/javascript'; 
	sa.async = true;
	sa.src = 'site-sonar.php?action=update';
	var ps = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; 
	ps.parentNode.insertBefore(sa, ps);
})();
			<?
		}
		if($action == '')
		{
			?>
function ssPing() {
	var img = new Image();
	img.src = 'site-sonar.php?action=ping&q=' + Math.round( Math.random() * 10000 );
}
self.setInterval("ssPing()", 60000);
			<?
		}
		?>
		</script>
		<?
		}
	}
}

//================================= PING ==========================================
if($action == 'ping')
{		
	$uid = isset($_COOKIE['SS_uid']) ? $_COOKIE['SS_uid'] : '';
	$ip = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
	
	$sql = "UPDATE user SET
				activity = datetime('now', 'localtime')
				WHERE uid = '$uid'";
	
	$error = '';	
	sqlite_exec($dbpointer, $sql, $error);
	if($error != '')
	{
		error_log("ERR 491: $error");
		return;
	}
	
	header("Content-Type: image/gif"); 
	$img = @imagecreate(10, 10);
	imagecolorallocate($img, 0, 0, 0);
	imagegif($img);
	imagedestroy($img);
}

//================================ DOWNLOAD ===================================

if($action == 'download')
{
	if($pswd != $SS_PASSWORD)
	{
		echo 'ERR:INCORRECT PASSWORD';
		exit();
	}

	$dxml = tempnam(":\n\\/?><", "");
	$dxmlgz = tempnam(":\n\\/?><", "");
	
	$xr = xmlwriter_open_uri($dxml);
	xmlwriter_start_document($xr, '1.0" encoding="Windows-1252');
	xmlwriter_start_element($xr, 'root');
	
	$islog = FALSE;
	

	//users
	xmlwriter_start_element($xr, 'user');
	$sql = "SELECT 
						id,
						created,
						activity,
						ip,
						sourceurl,
						user_agent,
						http_accept,
						sessiondata,
						language,
						resolution,
						colors,
						plugins
					FROM user";
					
	if($fromactivity != '')
		$sql .= " WHERE activity > datetime('$fromactivity')";
	
	$error = '';
	$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, $sql, SQLITE_ASSOC, $error);
	
	if($error != '')
	{
		error_log("ERR 546: $error");
		return;
	}
															
	while($row = sqlite_fetch_array($res))
	{
		xmlwriter_start_element($xr, 'row');
		$colindex = 0;
		foreach($row as $key => $val)
		{
			$islog = TRUE;
			xmlwriter_write_element($xr, 'c'.$colindex, $val);
			$colindex++;
		}
		xmlwriter_end_element($xr);
	}
	xmlwriter_end_element($xr);
	unset($res);
	
	//pageviews
	xmlwriter_start_element($xr, 'pageview');
	$sql = "SELECT id, fkuser, fkbefore, created, url FROM pageview";
					
	if($fromid != '')
		$sql .= " WHERE id > $fromid ";
		
	$sql .= " ORDER BY id ASC ";
		
	$error = '';
	$res = sqlite_query($dbpointer, $sql, SQLITE_ASSOC, $error);
	if($error != '')
	{
		error_log("ERR 577: $error");
		return;
	}
									
	while($row = sqlite_fetch_array($res))
	{
		xmlwriter_start_element($xr, 'row');
		$colindex = 0;
		foreach($row as $key => $val)
		{
			$islog = TRUE;
			xmlwriter_write_element($xr, 'c'.$colindex, $val);
			$colindex++;
		}
		xmlwriter_end_element($xr);
	}
	xmlwriter_end_element($xr);
	unset($res);
	//
	
	xmlwriter_end_element($xr);
	xmlwriter_end_document($xr);
	xmlwriter_flush($xr);

	//compress GZIP
	$fs = fopen($dxml, 'rb');
	$gz = gzopen($dxmlgz, 'w5');
	
	while (!feof($fs))
	{
  	$buffer = fread($fs, 1000);
		gzwrite($gz, $buffer);
	}

	gzclose($gz);
	fclose($fs);
	//compress

	if(!$islog)
	{
		header('Content-Description: File Transfer');
    header('Content-Type: none');
    header('Expires: 0');
    header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');
    header('Pragma: public');
	}
	else if (file_exists($dxmlgz))
	{
    header('Content-Description: File Transfer');
    header('Content-Type: application/x-gzip');
    header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=download.xml.gz');
    header('Expires: 0');
    header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');
    header('Pragma: public');
    header('Content-Length: '.filesize($dxmlgz));
		
    readfile($dxmlgz);
	}
	else if (file_exists($dxml))
	{
    header('Content-Description: File Transfer');
    header('Content-Type: text/xml');
    header('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=download.xml');
    header('Expires: 0');
    header('Cache-Control: must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0');
    header('Pragma: public');
    header('Content-Length: '.filesize($dxml));
    
		readfile($dxml);
	}

	if(file_exists($dxml))
		unlink($dxml);
	if(file_exists($dxmlgz))
		unlink($dxmlgz);
}

sqlite_close($dbpointer);
if(isset($dbpointer)) unset($dbpointer);

?><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog Archives - Verdocs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://verdocs.com/category/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://verdocs.com/category/blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>XiTrust Pricing: Complete Guide to MOXIS Plans (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/xitrust-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MOXIS lists MOXIS Now at €22/user/month and MOXIS Business at €46/user/month. Enterprise pricing is available by individual offers. MOXIS Now and Business show &#8220;Buy now&#8221; options on the official pricing page; MOXIS Enterprise requires an inquiry. The official pricing page does not show a public pricing calculator. This guide summarizes pricing and feature information from [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/xitrust-pricing/">XiTrust Pricing: Complete Guide to MOXIS Plans (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>MOXIS lists MOXIS Now at €22/user/month and MOXIS Business at €46/user/month. Enterprise pricing is available by individual offers. MOXIS Now and Business show &#8220;Buy now&#8221; options on the official pricing page; MOXIS Enterprise requires an inquiry. The official pricing page does not show a public pricing calculator.</p>


<p>This guide summarizes pricing and feature information from official XiTrust/MOXIS pages so buyers can benchmark plans before contacting the vendor. Understanding XiTrust pricing means understanding three distinct tiers, two billing approaches, and several deployment variables that affect what you ultimately pay. The sections below break all of it down, then compare MOXIS pricing against alternatives so you can benchmark costs accurately.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>MOXIS Now</strong> starts at €22/user/month. The official pricing page lists unlimited SES under fair-use terms; confirm AES availability and usage limits with XiTrust before purchasing.</li>


<li><strong>MOXIS Business</strong> is listed at €46/user/month and includes QES options under the plan terms. Check XiTrust&#8217;s official page for which trust-service providers and jurisdictions are included versus optional.</li>


<li><strong>MOXIS Enterprise</strong> pricing is available by individual offer. It adds cloud or on-premises deployment, identity management connection (including SSO via SAML/OIDC, user provisioning via SCIM, and Active Directory connection), a custom domain, and a dedicated advisor.</li>


<li>XiTrust offers two billing models: per-user (for teams with a defined user count) and per-document (for company-wide rollouts where total users are hard to predict).</li>


<li>A-Trust QES signatures are listed as included on eligible plans under fair-use terms. Other QES options, including D-Trust, Swisscom/eIDAS, or ZertES-related options, should be confirmed directly with XiTrust.</li>


<li>MOXIS does not list a free tier on its official pricing page. Now and Business show &#8220;Buy now&#8221; options; Enterprise requires an inquiry. Trial availability should be confirmed directly with XiTrust.</li>


<li>Teams building eSignature into applications rather than using it as a standalone portal have a different set of requirements that user-based SaaS pricing does not address well. <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> provides a permanent free tier with <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong> and full API access with no per-seat minimum.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research XiTrust Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Teams research XiTrust pricing to compare MOXIS plan costs before purchasing. Most fall into three groups.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Compliance-first procurement teams</strong> in European regulated industries are evaluating MOXIS as a QES-capable signing platform. They need to understand whether MOXIS pricing includes QES or whether it costs extra per signature, and whether on-premises deployment is available at a viable price point.</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise buyers benchmarking options</strong> already have a shortlist. They want to compare MOXIS pricing against DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat Sign, or regional European alternatives like Skribble or Signicat before entering vendor conversations. They need enough pricing transparency to filter out options that are clearly out of range.</li>


<li><strong>Development teams evaluating API capabilities</strong> are assessing whether MOXIS can serve as the backend for an<a href="https://verdocs.com/embed-esignatures-into-your-app/"> embedded signing workflow</a>. They want to know how MOXIS API access is structured and how pricing scales with document volume in a production environment. MOXIS is a portal-based signing platform designed for organizational workflows rather than as an embeddable component library. Teams <a href="https://verdocs.com/build-custom-esignature-experiences/">building signing</a>  into their own product rather than routing users to a third-party portal will find that MOXIS&#8217;s portal-first architecture is not designed for that use case.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>XiTrust MOXIS Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>XiTrust MOXIS offers three named plans under its user-based billing model and an alternative document-based billing option for company-wide deployments.</p>


<p><strong>MOXIS Now: €22/user/month</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5-user minimum, 50-user maximum</li>


<li>Unlimited SES (simple electronic signatures) under fair-use terms; confirm AES availability with XiTrust</li>


<li>Standard signature workflows with configurable routing</li>


<li>Drag-and-drop signature field placement</li>


<li>External signing for parties outside your organization</li>


<li>Batch signature processing</li>


<li>MOXIS Business Cloud infrastructure with EU-hosted data storage</li>


<li>&#8220;Buy now&#8221; option available on the official pricing page</li>


<li>Best for: Teams in non-regulated industries that primarily need internal signing workflows and do not require QES</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>MOXIS Business: €46/user/month</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5-user minimum, 100-user maximum</li>


<li>All MOXIS Now features</li>


<li>QES options included under plan terms (A-Trust QES signatures listed as included under fair-use terms; confirm other QES options and jurisdictions with XiTrust)</li>


<li>Same Business Cloud infrastructure and EU data hosting</li>


<li>&#8220;Buy now&#8221; option available on the official pricing page</li>


<li>Best for: European enterprises in regulated industries where QES is a compliance requirement</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>MOXIS Enterprise: Custom pricing (inquiry required)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>All MOXIS Business features</li>


<li>Cloud deployment in a dedicated area within XiTrust&#8217;s European private cloud, or on-premises deployment within your own data center</li>


<li>REST API connectivity included (confirm plan-level API availability and any add-on pricing for Now and Business with XiTrust)</li>


<li>Unlimited process configurations for complex, multi-step signature workflows</li>


<li>Identity management connection, including SSO via SAML/OIDC, user provisioning via SCIM, and Active Directory connection</li>


<li>Custom domain for branded signing environments</li>


<li>Dedicated advisor and Customer Success Management</li>


<li>Deputy rules, serial jobs, and role-based user management</li>


<li>Option to store a qualified company seal on-premises</li>


<li>Priority support with faster response SLAs</li>


<li>Best for: Organizations requiring on-premises deployment, advanced integration capabilities, or dedicated support</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>MOXIS Now Plan: Features and What to Know</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> €22/user/month</li>


<li><strong>User limits:</strong> 5-user minimum, 50-user maximum</li>


<li><strong>Signatures:</strong> Unlimited SES under fair-use terms; confirm AES availability with XiTrust</li>


<li><strong>Best for:</strong> Teams in non-regulated industries with standard signing workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What MOXIS Now Includes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Unlimited SES</strong> under fair-use terms for routine business workflows</li>


<li><strong>Standard signature workflows</strong> with configurable routing and drag-and-drop signature field placement</li>


<li><strong>External signing</strong> for customers, suppliers, and contractors outside your organization</li>


<li><strong>Batch signature processing</strong> for signing multiple requests in a single event</li>


<li><strong>EU-hosted data storage</strong> within MOXIS Business Cloud infrastructure</li>


<li><strong>Email-based signing links</strong> for recipients</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>QES is not included. Teams that need a legally equivalent-to-handwritten signature for certain contract types under EU law must upgrade to MOXIS Business. MOXIS lists REST API connectivity as an available integration option; confirm plan availability and any add-on pricing with XiTrust. Custom domain, advanced identity management, and dedicated support are Enterprise features.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>MOXIS Now Pricing at Common Team Sizes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5 users (minimum): €110/month (€1,320/year)</li>


<li>10 users: €220/month (€2,640/year)</li>


<li>25 users: €550/month (€6,600/year)</li>


<li>50 users (maximum): €1,100/month (€13,200/year)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>MOXIS Business Plan: Features and What to Know</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> €46/user/month</li>


<li><strong>User limits:</strong> 5-user minimum, 100-user maximum</li>


<li><strong>Signatures:</strong> SES, AES, and QES options included under plan terms</li>


<li><strong>Best for:</strong> European enterprises in regulated industries where QES is a compliance requirement</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What MOXIS Business Adds Over Now</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>QES options</strong> included under plan terms; A-Trust QES signatures listed as included under fair-use terms</li>


<li><strong>All MOXIS Now features</strong> including SES, batch signing, external signing, and workflow routing</li>


<li><strong>Same Business Cloud infrastructure</strong> and EU data hosting</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Teams should confirm with XiTrust which trust-service providers and jurisdictions are covered under the base fee versus optional, and whether any cross-border or multi-jurisdiction workflows require additional configuration or costs.</p>


<p>MOXIS lists REST API connectivity as an available integration option; confirm plan availability and any add-on pricing with XiTrust before finalizing a budget for teams with integration requirements.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>MOXIS Business Pricing at Common Team Sizes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5 users (minimum): €230/month (€2,760/year)</li>


<li>10 users: €460/month (€5,520/year)</li>


<li>25 users: €1,150/month (€13,800/year)</li>


<li>50 users: €2,300/month (€27,600/year)</li>


<li>100 users (maximum): €4,600/month (€55,200/year)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>MOXIS Enterprise Plan: Custom Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>MOXIS Enterprise pricing is available on request. It covers everything in MOXIS Business and adds enterprise-grade deployment flexibility, dedicated support, and advanced configuration options.</p>


<p>Enterprise pricing makes sense when any of the following apply: your organization requires on-premises deployment for regulatory or data sovereignty reasons; you need API connectivity included in the base subscription rather than as a separate item to confirm; you have a large, complex user base with role hierarchies and delegation rules; or you need a dedicated support contact rather than shared support queues.</p>


<p>XiTrust does not publish a starting price for Enterprise. Pricing reflects user count, deployment type (cloud vs. on-premises), and the scope of integration and configuration work required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>User-Based vs. Document-Based Billing</strong></h2>


<p>XiTrust offers two fundamentally different billing approaches for MOXIS. Choosing the right one affects the total cost of ownership significantly.</p>


<p><strong>User-based billing</strong> charges a fixed monthly fee per named user. It works best for teams with a defined, stable set of signers. This model is predictable and easy to budget against headcount.</p>


<p><strong>Document-based billing</strong> charges per document rather than per user. XiTrust positions this model for company-wide deployments where the number of users is large or undefined, but signing activity is concentrated in high-volume batches. It suits organizations where most employees sign documents occasionally rather than regularly.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Small-to-mid-size team with regular signers: user-based</li>


<li>Large enterprise with occasional signers across the workforce: document-based</li>


<li>Defined headcount with predictable monthly volume: user-based</li>


<li>High-volume transactional workflows (hundreds of documents per day): document-based</li>


<li>Embedding signing into an application with external users: document-based or Enterprise</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Document-based pricing is not publicly listed. XiTrust structures it as part of an Enterprise or custom contract, requiring a sales engagement for a quote.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>QES Pricing: Included vs. Confirmed Separately</strong></h2>


<p>Qualified electronic signatures represent the most significant pricing variable in XiTrust MOXIS contracts. QES requires identity verification through a trust service provider (TSP) and carries the highest legal standing under the<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014R0910"> eIDAS Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014</a>.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>MOXIS Now:</strong> QES is not included. Teams that need QES must upgrade to Business.</li>


<li><strong>MOXIS Business:</strong> A-Trust QES signatures are listed as included under fair-use terms. Other QES options, including D-Trust, Swisscom/eIDAS, or ZertES-related options, should be confirmed directly with XiTrust. Buyers should also confirm which jurisdictions are covered at the base fee and whether cross-border workflows require additional setup.</li>


<li><strong>MOXIS Enterprise:</strong> QES is included. Enterprise customers also have the option to store a qualified company seal on-premises, enabling batch QES processing at volume.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Teams operating across multiple EU member states or in Switzerland should clarify with XiTrust which jurisdictions are covered under the base fee and whether any require additional trust service provider fees before finalizing pricing.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deployment Options and Their Impact on Price</strong></h2>


<p>XiTrust offers three deployment configurations under MOXIS, each with different cost and compliance implications.</p>


<p><strong>MOXIS Business Cloud</strong> is available to Now and Business plan subscribers. XiTrust manages all infrastructure, updates, and uptime. This is the lowest-friction, lowest-cost entry point, with &#8220;Buy now&#8221; available on the official pricing page.</p>


<p><strong>MOXIS Enterprise Cloud</strong> provides a dedicated, isolated environment within XiTrust&#8217;s European private cloud. Your data is logically separated from other tenants. Custom domain configuration, identity management connection, and dedicated configuration options are available. Pricing is negotiated as part of the Enterprise contract.</p>


<p><strong>MOXIS Enterprise On-Premises</strong> deploys MOXIS within your own data center or private cloud environment. It is the option for organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements or industries where external cloud hosting is not acceptable under internal policy or sector regulation. Pricing reflects both the software license and any professional services required for initial deployment and ongoing support.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>XiTrust MOXIS vs. Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>XiTrust vs. Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is an <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first eSignature platform</a> purpose-built for developers embedding legally binding document workflows directly into their own applications. Where MOXIS operates as a standalone signing portal, Verdocs lets teams deliver the entire document lifecycle inside their own branded product, without the recipient ever leaving the publisher&#8217;s application.</p>


<p>Verdocs provides native web components and iframe options that integrate with frameworks including React, Vue, Angular, and TypeScript, with full CSS styling control. Open-source SDKs under the MIT license give engineering teams full implementation flexibility. SOC 2 Type I certified, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration (bring-your-own signing certificates), and PKI digital certificates. Verdocs delivers the signing experience without requiring iframes (iframes also available when preferred). A permanent free tier at 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required lets development teams evaluate the full component library and test embeddable signing before any commitment.</p>


<p><strong>Key comparison points:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Primary use case:</strong> Verdocs is built for <a href="https://verdocs.com/embeddable-esignature-platform/">embedded eSignature workflows</a> inside your own product; MOXIS is a standalone signing portal designed for organizational workflows</li>


<li><strong>Starting cost:</strong> Verdocs offers a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month; MOXIS Now starts at €22/user/month, with &#8220;Buy now&#8221; available for self-serve purchasing</li>


<li><strong>API access:</strong> Verdocs includes API access on the free tier with no per-seat minimums; MOXIS API connectivity availability and add-on pricing should be confirmed with XiTrust for Now and Business plans</li>


<li><strong>White-label support:</strong> Full CSS control with no iframe requirement on Verdocs (iframes also available when preferred); MOXIS custom domain is an Enterprise feature</li>


<li><strong>Framework support:</strong> Verdocs supports React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, and TypeScript; MOXIS integrates via REST API and enterprise system connectors</li>


<li><strong>Security:</strong> Verdocs is SOC 2 Type I certified, E-SIGN Act and UETA compliant, with 2048-bit RSA encryption and modular HSM integration; MOXIS supports eIDAS-compliant SES, AES, and QES with EU data hosting in the DACH region</li>


<li><strong>Open-source SDKs:</strong> Verdocs provides MIT-licensed open-source SDKs; MOXIS does not publish an open-source SDK</li>


<li><strong>Per-seat minimums:</strong> None on Verdocs; MOXIS Now and Business require a minimum of 5 users</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>XiTrust vs. DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>DocuSign eSignature plans start at $11/month for Personal, with Standard at $30/user/month and Business Pro at $45/user/month when billed annually. Enterprise plans are custom. DocuSign has a broader global integration ecosystem and a well-established enterprise support network. MOXIS Business&#8217;s flat-fee QES model is a differentiator for EU-regulated teams with consistent QES demand, as DocuSign charges per qualified signature transaction under eIDAS in many configurations.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>XiTrust vs. Adobe Sign</strong></h3>


<p>Adobe publishes team pricing for Acrobat plans and offers custom pricing for Acrobat Sign Solutions at the enterprise level. Adobe Sign integrates natively with Acrobat, Creative Cloud, and Document Cloud and supports eIDAS QES at enterprise tiers. Teams already invested in the Adobe ecosystem benefit from native document round-tripping. MOXIS is the stronger fit for organizations prioritizing DACH-region data sovereignty and A-Trust QES coverage in the base plan.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>XiTrust vs. Skribble</strong></h3>


<p>Skribble lists Individual at €9/user/month, Team at €23/user/month, and Pro at €36/user/month, with additional AES/QES signature fees depending on plan. Skribble targets similar eIDAS/ZertES compliance requirements with a simpler pricing model and a modern interface with lower setup complexity than enterprise-tier MOXIS plans. It is a strong alternative for smaller European teams that need occasional QES without committing to a per-seat monthly subscription with a 5-user minimum.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Common Budgeting Considerations for MOXIS</strong></h2>


<p>Teams that move quickly from pricing review to contract sometimes discover costs they did not model upfront. These are the most common gaps to address before signing.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Confirm API access and pricing before finalizing the base plan budget.</strong> MOXIS lists REST API connectivity as an available integration option. Teams with SAP, Salesforce, or SharePoint integration requirements should confirm plan-level API availability and any add-on pricing in writing before committing.</li>


<li><strong>Verify QES jurisdiction coverage.</strong> A-Trust QES signatures are listed as included under fair-use terms on eligible plans, but other QES options and cross-border workflows should be confirmed directly with XiTrust. Teams operating across multiple EU member states or in Switzerland should clarify which jurisdictions are covered at the base fee.</li>


<li><strong>Request a document-based billing quote alongside per-seat pricing.</strong> For organizations with large or undefined user populations where signing activity is spread broadly, document-based billing may produce a lower total cost than allocating a seat to every user. Request both quote types before making a final decision.</li>


<li><strong>Account for implementation and configuration services.</strong> MOXIS Business Cloud requires minimal setup. MOXIS Enterprise Cloud and On-Premises involve configuration work by XiTrust&#8217;s implementation team, which may carry professional services fees invoiced separately from the software license. Confirm this during the sales process.</li>


<li><strong>Factor in currency exposure.</strong> MOXIS prices in euros. Organizations budgeting in USD or GBP should factor in currency fluctuation when building multi-year total cost of ownership models, or confirm whether XiTrust offers local-currency contracts.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>XiTrust pricing is transparent at the plan level (€22/user/month for Now and €46/user/month for Business, both with &#8220;Buy now&#8221; available) but requires a sales conversation for Enterprise pricing, document-based billing rates, and detailed API and implementation cost confirmation.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing MOXIS:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For EU teams in non-regulated industries:</strong> MOXIS Now at €22/user/month provides SES signing workflows with Business Cloud infrastructure and a 5-user minimum entry point. Confirm AES availability and usage limits with XiTrust before purchasing.</li>


<li><strong>For European enterprises requiring QES:</strong> MOXIS Business at €46/user/month includes A-Trust QES under fair-use terms with flat-fee per-user billing. Confirm which jurisdictions and trust-service providers are covered at the base fee versus optional before finalizing the budget.</li>


<li><strong>For organizations with on-premises or advanced integration requirements:</strong> MOXIS Enterprise provides dedicated cloud or on-premises deployment, identity management connection, and REST API connectivity. Contact XiTrust directly for a custom quote.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with native web components, full CSS control, open-source SDKs under the MIT license, a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month, and no iframe requirement (iframes also available when preferred). MOXIS is a signing portal and is not designed for native in-app embedding.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, and real estate teams with regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific embedded eSignature with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Build for free</a> and launch a fully white-labeled eSignature experience inside your application in hours.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does XiTrust MOXIS cost?</strong></h3>


<p>MOXIS Now is listed at €22/user/month and MOXIS Business at €46/user/month on XiTrust&#8217;s official pricing page. Both plans require a minimum of 5 users. MOXIS Now has a maximum of 50 users; MOXIS Business has a maximum of 100 users. MOXIS Enterprise pricing is available by individual offer and requires contacting XiTrust directly.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does XiTrust offer a free plan or trial?</strong></h3>


<p>MOXIS does not list a free tier on its official pricing page. MOXIS Now and Business show &#8220;Buy now&#8221; options for self-serve purchasing; Enterprise requires an inquiry. Trial availability should be confirmed directly with XiTrust.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the difference between MOXIS Now and MOXIS Business?</strong></h3>


<p>MOXIS Now (€22/user/month) covers SES under fair-use terms and does not include QES. MOXIS Business (€46/user/month) adds QES options, including A-Trust QES under fair-use terms, which carries the highest legal standing under the EU eIDAS Regulation. QES is required for certain contract types in regulated industries across Europe. Buyers should confirm AES availability on Now and the full scope of QES coverage on Business directly with XiTrust.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is MOXIS eIDAS compliant?</strong></h3>


<p>Yes. MOXIS supports SES, AES, and QES in alignment with the <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014R0910">eIDAS Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014</a>. MOXIS also supports ZertES compliance for Swiss regulatory requirements. Buyers should confirm which specific trust-service providers and jurisdictions are covered under each plan before purchasing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the best alternative to XiTrust MOXIS for developers building embedded signing?</strong></h3>


<p>For developers who need to embed legally binding document signing directly into their own application, <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is the purpose-built option. Verdocs provides native web components that integrate with React, Angular, Vue, and TypeScript, open-source MIT-licensed SDKs, a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and full API access, no per-seat minimum, and no credit card required to start. MOXIS is a standalone signing portal and is not designed for native in-app embedding.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Can MOXIS be deployed on-premises?</strong></h3>


<p>Yes. MOXIS Enterprise On-Premises deploys within your own data center or private cloud environment. This option is available for organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements. Pricing is custom and scoped through the Enterprise inquiry process. MOXIS Now and Business plans are available on MOXIS Business Cloud only.</p>


<p></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/xitrust-pricing/">XiTrust Pricing: Complete Guide to MOXIS Plans (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qwilr Pricing: Complete Guide to Plans and Costs (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/qwilr-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If you are researching Qwilr pricing, you have probably already seen the plan page. Business at $35 per user per month, Enterprise at $59. The published numbers are clear enough. What the plan page does not surface is the full cost picture: the 10-user Enterprise minimum that sets the floor at $7,080 per year before [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/qwilr-pricing/">Qwilr Pricing: Complete Guide to Plans and Costs (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>If you are researching Qwilr pricing, you have probably already seen the plan page. Business at $35 per user per month, Enterprise at $59. The published numbers are clear enough. What the plan page does not surface is the full cost picture: the 10-user Enterprise minimum that sets the floor at $7,080 per year before a single proposal is sent, the API add-on structure, or the dual transaction fee that applies to every QwilrPay payment collected. For teams actively comparing options, those details are what actually determine whether Qwilr fits the budget.</p>


<p>Qwilr pricing starts at $35 per user per month on the Business plan (billed annually) and $59 per user per month on the Enterprise plan, with a mandatory 10-seat minimum that sets the minimum annual Enterprise spend at $7,080. There is no free plan. All new accounts receive a 14-day trial on the Business tier. Qwilr&#8217;s official materials are inconsistent on API access: the pricing page says API is available on all plans with fees, while Qwilr&#8217;s API documentation says an Enterprise account with API enabled is required. Buyers should confirm API access and pricing directly with Qwilr.</p>


<p>This guide covers every Qwilr plan, including what is included in each tier, any additional costs buyers should account for, and how Qwilr&#8217;s pricing compares to the document workflow and eSignature platforms teams most often evaluate alongside it.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Business plan:</strong> $35/user/month (annual) or $39/user/month (monthly). Includes the core editor, eSignature, QwilrPay, HubSpot integration, and 120-day analytics history.</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise plan:</strong> $59/user/month (annual), 10-seat minimum, setting the minimum annual spend at <strong>$7,080/year</strong>. Adds Salesforce integration, custom domain, custom fonts, team permissions, and a dedicated account manager.</li>


<li><strong>No permanent free plan.</strong> Qwilr offers a 14-day trial with no credit card required. After the 14-day trial expires, Qwilr Pages remain live for 30 days, but account access ends unless a paid plan is chosen.</li>


<li><strong>API access:</strong> Qwilr&#8217;s pricing page says API is available on all plans with fees; Qwilr&#8217;s API documentation says an Enterprise account with API enabled is required. Confirm API access and pricing directly with Qwilr before purchasing.</li>


<li><strong>QwilrPay adds fees:</strong> Qwilr lists QwilrPay application fees of 0.09% on Business and 0.05% on Enterprise, in addition to payment processor fees.</li>


<li><strong>Qwilr lists API fees, onboarding packages, and design services</strong> as add-on items. Confirm current add-on pricing with Qwilr during the sales process.</li>


<li>For teams who need to <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embed legally </a>binding document signing into their own application, Verdocs is purpose-built for that architecture with a permanent free tier of <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong> and no per-seat minimum.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research Qwilr Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three scenarios account for most Qwilr pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>The Enterprise minimum creates a significant commitment floor.</strong> Teams of fewer than 10 people that need Salesforce integration, custom branding, or team permissions must purchase 10 Enterprise seats regardless of actual headcount. At $59/seat/month billed annually, that is $7,080 per year before any add-ons.</li>


<li><strong>API access requires clarification before purchasing.</strong> Qwilr&#8217;s pricing page and API documentation contain conflicting information on which plan includes API access and what fees apply. Teams that need programmatic document creation or custom integrations should confirm API scope and pricing directly with Qwilr&#8217;s sales team before signing.</li>


<li><strong>QwilrPay carries two separate fee layers.</strong> Payment collection at the point of signature is a compelling feature, but every transaction incurs both Qwilr&#8217;s own application fee (0.09% on Business, 0.05% on Enterprise) and payment processor fees on top. Teams processing regular payments should model the combined fee impact before committing.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Qwilr Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>Qwilr pricing is structured around two plans and a per-user seat model. Costs scale directly with team headcount.</p>


<p><strong>Business: $35/user/month (annual) or $39/user/month (monthly)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Core interactive proposal editor</li>


<li>eSignature with timestamped compliance records</li>


<li>QwilrPay (0.09% Qwilr application fee per transaction, plus payment processor fees)</li>


<li>HubSpot CRM integration</li>


<li>Page analytics with 120-day history</li>


<li>Up to 2 template collections</li>


<li>Best for: Small to mid-size sales teams using HubSpot</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise: $59/user/month (annual only), 10-seat minimum</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>All Business Plan features</li>


<li>Salesforce integration (Enterprise only)</li>


<li>Custom domain and branded email delivery</li>


<li>Custom fonts</li>


<li>Team permissions and role-based access controls</li>


<li>Domain-restricted access</li>


<li>Dedicated account manager (for accounts with 10 or more seats)</li>


<li>5-year analytics history and up to 8 template collections</li>


<li>QwilrPay application fee reduced to 0.05% per transaction</li>


<li>API access (confirm scope and fees directly with Qwilr; official sources conflict on which plans include access and at what cost)</li>


<li>Best for: Larger sales organizations needing Salesforce automation, custom branding, and team-level controls</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Minimum annual Enterprise spend: $7,080 ($59 x 10 users x 12 months).</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business Plan: Features and What to Know</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $35/user/month (annual) or $39/user/month (monthly)</li>


<li><strong>Minimum users:</strong> 1</li>


<li><strong>Best for:</strong> Small to mid-size sales teams using HubSpot as their CRM</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Business Includes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Interactive content editor</strong> for building web-based proposals with embedded video, dynamic pricing tables, images, and branded section layouts</li>


<li><strong>eSignature</strong> with legally binding digital signatures, timestamped and logged for compliance; recipients sign without creating a Qwilr account</li>


<li><strong>QwilrPay</strong> for payment collection at the point of signature; Qwilr application fee of 0.09% per transaction applies, in addition to payment processor fees</li>


<li><strong>HubSpot integration</strong> to sync proposals with HubSpot CRM and pull proposal status back into pipelines automatically</li>


<li><strong>Page analytics</strong> with open tracking, time-on-section data, and link-sharing activity; analytics history retained for 120 days</li>


<li><strong>Template library</strong> with up to 2 collections for organizing templates and documents</li>


<li><strong>AI Proposal Creator</strong> for assisted proposal generation</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Business is the right starting point for small to mid-size sales teams whose CRM is HubSpot and who send proposals regularly. Teams that need Salesforce connectivity, custom branding, or extended analytics retention will find those capabilities in the Enterprise tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business Plan Pricing at Common Team Sizes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>1 user: $420/year ($35/month)</li>


<li>3 users: $1,260/year ($105/month)</li>


<li>5 users: $2,100/year ($175/month)</li>


<li>10 users: $4,200/year ($350/month)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan: Features and What to Know</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $59/user/month (annual only)</li>


<li><strong>Minimum users:</strong> 10</li>


<li><strong>Minimum annual spend:</strong> $7,080</li>


<li><strong>Best for:</strong> Sales organizations needing Salesforce integration, custom branding, team permissions, and administrative controls</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Enterprise Adds Over Business</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Salesforce integration</strong> to auto-populate proposal pages from Salesforce opportunity fields and sync proposal status, open events, and payment data back into Salesforce records</li>


<li><strong>Custom branding,</strong> including your own domain for proposal delivery links, Qwilr branding removal from outbound emails, and custom font families</li>


<li><strong>Team permissions</strong> with role-based access controls for editing, sending, and template management</li>


<li><strong>Domain-restricted access</strong> for limiting proposal access to specific email domains</li>


<li><strong>Dedicated account manager</strong> for accounts with 10 or more seats, including onboarding guidance and priority support</li>


<li><strong>Extended analytics history</strong> from 120 days (Business) to 5 years; template collections increased from 2 to 8</li>


<li><strong>Reduced QwilrPay application fee</strong> of 0.05% per transaction (vs. 0.09% on Business)</li>


<li><strong>API access:</strong> Confirm scope and fees with Qwilr directly, as the pricing page and API documentation contain conflicting information</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan Pricing at Common Team Sizes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>10 users (minimum): $7,080/year ($590/month)</li>


<li>15 users: $10,620/year ($885/month)</li>


<li>20 users: $14,160/year ($1,180/month)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>These figures do not include API fees, QwilrPay transaction fees, or optional onboarding and design service packages.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Qwilr Free Trial</strong></h2>


<p>Qwilr offers a 14-day free trial on the Business plan with no credit card required and no contract commitment.</p>


<p>The trial provides access to the full Business plan feature set, including the interactive content editor, eSignature, QwilrPay, HubSpot integration, and the 120-day analytics window. Teams can send actual proposals and collect real signatures during the trial period.</p>


<p><strong>What the trial does not include:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Salesforce integration (Enterprise only)</li>


<li>Custom domain and branded email delivery (Enterprise only)</li>


<li>Custom fonts (Enterprise only)</li>


<li>Team permissions and domain-restricted access (Enterprise only)</li>


<li>API access (confirm with Qwilr)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>After the 14-day trial expires, Qwilr Pages remain live for 30 days, but account access ends unless a paid plan is activated. Qwilr does not offer a permanent free tier. Teams that need a longer evaluation window should request an extended pilot from the sales team.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Add-On Costs and Fees</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>QwilrPay Transaction Fees</strong></h3>


<p>QwilrPay enables payment collection at the point of signature. Every transaction carries two separate fee layers: Qwilr&#8217;s own application fee (0.09% on Business, 0.05% on Enterprise) plus payment processor fees. Confirm current processor rates directly with your payment processor. Teams processing regular payments through QwilrPay should model the combined fee impact against the convenience of in-proposal payment collection.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API Access</strong></h3>


<p>Qwilr&#8217;s official materials conflict on API access. The pricing page says API is available on all plans with fees; Qwilr&#8217;s API documentation says an Enterprise account with API enabled is required. Buyers planning to use the Qwilr API should confirm access scope and pricing directly with Qwilr&#8217;s sales team before signing any contract.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Onboarding and Design Services</strong></h3>


<p>Qwilr lists API fees, onboarding packages, and design services as add-on items. These are not required for platform access but are relevant for Enterprise deployments with complex branding requirements. Pricing is available through Qwilr&#8217;s sales team on request.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Annual vs. Monthly Billing</strong></h3>


<p>Annual billing is the standard pricing structure and is the basis for the $35 and $59 per-user prices. Monthly billing is available only on the Business plan.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Business monthly: $39/user/month</li>


<li>Business annual: $35/user/month (saves $48/seat/year)</li>


<li>Enterprise: annual only at $59/user/month</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>For a 5-person Business team, the difference between monthly and annual billing is $240 per year. Enterprise accounts are annual-only, meaning any team on that tier is committed for a full contract year.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Qwilr vs. Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Qwilr vs. Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is an <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first eSignature platform</a> purpose-built for developers embedding legally binding document workflows directly into their own applications. Where Qwilr delivers an interactive proposal experience hosted at a Qwilr URL, Verdocs lets teams deliver the entire document lifecycle inside their own branded product, without the recipient ever leaving the publisher&#8217;s application.</p>


<p>Verdocs provides native web components and iframe options that integrate with frameworks including React, Vue, Angular, and TypeScript, with full CSS styling control. Open-source SDKs under the MIT license give engineering teams full implementation flexibility. SOC 2 Type I certified, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration (bring-your-own signing certificates), and PKI digital certificates. Verdocs delivers the signing experience without requiring iframes (iframes are also available when preferred). API pricing, with a permanent free tier at 25 envelopes per month and no credit card required.</p>


<p><strong>Key comparison points:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Primary use case:</strong> Verdocs is built for <a href="https://verdocs.com/embeddable-esignature-platform/">embedded eSignature workflows</a> inside your own product; Qwilr is a sales proposal platform with eSignature as a core component</li>


<li><strong>Starting cost:</strong> Verdocs offers a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month; Qwilr starts at $35/user/month, with a 14-day trial available</li>


<li><strong>API access:</strong> Verdocs includes API access on the free tier with published pricing and no seat minimums; Qwilr&#8217;s API access terms conflict across official sources and require direct confirmation with sales</li>


<li><strong>White-label support:</strong> Full CSS control with no iframe requirement on Verdocs (iframes also available when preferred); Qwilr offers custom branding on Enterprise only</li>


<li><strong>Framework support:</strong> Verdocs supports React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, and TypeScript; Qwilr integrates via CRM connectors and API</li>


<li><strong>Security:</strong> Verdocs is SOC 2 Type I certified, E-SIGN Act and UETA compliant, with 2048-bit RSA encryption and modular HSM integration; Qwilr provides eSignature with timestamped compliance records</li>


<li><strong>Open-source SDKs:</strong> Verdocs provides MIT-licensed open-source SDKs; Qwilr does not publish an open-source SDK</li>


<li><strong>Per-seat minimums:</strong> None on Verdocs; Qwilr Enterprise requires a minimum of 10 seats annually</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Qwilr vs. PandaDoc</strong></h3>


<p>PandaDoc offers a Free eSign plan at $0, Starter at $19/user/month billed annually, Business at $49/user/month billed annually, and Enterprise at custom pricing. PandaDoc lists API access as available with extra fees or as a paid add-on; buyers should confirm API pricing directly with PandaDoc. CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and Zoho are available on paid tiers without a 10-seat enterprise commitment. PandaDoc covers proposals, contracts, purchase agreements, and invoices, making it a broader-scope tool for teams managing multiple document types.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Qwilr vs. Proposify</strong></h3>


<p>Proposify lists Basic at $29/month monthly or $19/month annually, Team at $49/month monthly or $41/month annually, and Business at $65/month. Basic includes 5 document sends per month; additional documents can be purchased for $1.99/month. Team and Business include unlimited document sends. Integrations are not available on Basic. Team and Business connect with CRMs and other tools. Salesforce is available as a paid add-on on Business. Proposify&#8217;s section-by-section engagement analytics provide more granular visibility into prospect behavior within proposals than Qwilr&#8217;s page-level analytics.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Considerations on Qwilr</strong></h2>


<p>Qwilr&#8217;s official materials are inconsistent on API access. The pricing page states API is available on all plans with fees, while Qwilr&#8217;s API quick-start documentation states that an Enterprise account with API enabled is required. Buyers planning to use the Qwilr API for document automation, CRM data synchronization, or custom integrations should confirm API access scope and pricing directly with Qwilr&#8217;s sales team before signing any contract.</p>


<p>Teams whose primary requirement is programmatic document creation or embedding signing into their own systems should evaluate platforms where API access is a core feature at every tier rather than a point requiring clarification.<a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> Verdocs</a> provides published API pricing, open-source SDKs, and a free tier with full API access and no per-seat minimum.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>Qwilr is a strong choice for sales teams where proposal design is a competitive differentiator and HubSpot or Salesforce is the CRM of record. The pricing model is predictable, QwilrPay reduces friction from proposal acceptance to payment collection, and the interactive web-page format produces a buyer experience that is meaningfully different from document-style tools.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing Qwilr:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For HubSpot-based sales teams:</strong> The Business plan at $35/user/month covers the full proposal-to-signature workflow, including HubSpot integration, QwilrPay, eSignature, and page analytics. The 14-day trial is a practical way to validate fit before committing.</li>


<li><strong>For Salesforce-based organizations with 10 or more seats:</strong> The Enterprise plan adds Salesforce integration, custom branding, and team permissions. Budget for the 10-seat minimum, the reduced QwilrPay application fee, and confirm API scope and pricing with Qwilr&#8217;s sales team before signing.</li>


<li><strong>For teams managing contracts and invoices alongside proposals:</strong> PandaDoc&#8217;s broader document scope and lower entry pricing may be a better fit, particularly for teams that want Salesforce integration without a 10-seat minimum.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with native web components, full CSS control, open-source SDKs under the MIT license, a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month, and no iframe requirement (iframes also available when preferred). Qwilr is a proposal platform and is not designed for in-app embedding.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, and real estate teams with regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific embedded eSignature with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Start for free</a> and build embeddable eSignature workflows without per-user fees or iframe dependencies.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does Qwilr cost in 2026?</strong></h3>


<p>Qwilr pricing starts at $35 per user per month on the Business plan billed annually, or $39 per user per month billed monthly. The Enterprise plan is $59 per user per month, billed annually with a mandatory 10-user minimum, setting the minimum annual Enterprise spend at $7,080. There is no permanent free plan; a 14-day trial of the Business plan is available with no credit card required.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Qwilr have a free plan?</strong></h3>


<p>No. Qwilr does not offer a permanent free plan. New accounts receive a 14-day trial on the Business plan with no credit card required. After the trial expires, Qwilr Pages remain live for 30 days, but account access ends unless a paid plan is activated.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the difference between Qwilr Business and Enterprise?</strong></h3>


<p>The Business plan includes the core proposal editor, eSignature, QwilrPay, HubSpot integration, 120-day analytics history, and up to 2 template collections. Enterprise adds Salesforce integration, custom domain and fonts, team permissions, domain-restricted access, a dedicated account manager, 5-year analytics history, 8 template collections, and a reduced QwilrPay application fee of 0.05% per transaction. Enterprise requires a minimum of 10 seats billed annually.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Qwilr include API access?</strong></h3>


<p>Qwilr&#8217;s official materials conflict on this point. The pricing page states API is available on all plans with fees, while Qwilr&#8217;s API documentation states an Enterprise account with API enabled is required. Buyers who need API access should confirm scope and pricing directly with Qwilr&#8217;s sales team before purchasing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What are the best alternatives to Qwilr for developers building embedded signing?</strong></h3>


<p>For developers who need to embed legally binding document signing directly into their own application,<a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> Verdocs</a> is the purpose-built option. Verdocs provides native web components that integrate with React, Angular, Vue, and TypeScript, open-source MIT-licensed SDKs, a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and full API access, no per-seat minimum, and no credit card required to start. Qwilr is a sales proposal platform and is not designed for native in-app embedding.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/qwilr-pricing/">Qwilr Pricing: Complete Guide to Plans and Costs (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GetAccept Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/getaccept-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GetAccept pricing starts at $25/user/month for the eSign plan, the best entry point for individuals and small teams that need core e-signatures without an annual commitment. GetAccept&#8217;s current public pricing page lists eSign at $25/user/month, Professional at $49/user/month with a minimum of five users, and Enterprise with custom pricing available by contacting sales. If you [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/getaccept-pricing/">GetAccept Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>GetAccept pricing starts at $25/user/month for the eSign plan, the best entry point for individuals and small teams that need core e-signatures without an annual commitment. GetAccept&#8217;s current public pricing page lists eSign at $25/user/month, Professional at $49/user/month with a minimum of five users, and Enterprise with custom pricing available by contacting sales.</p>


<p>If you are evaluating GetAccept, the pricing page raises practical questions. What does each plan include? How does the five-user minimum on Professional affect smaller teams? What capabilities are bundled at the base price versus sold as add-ons? And how does GetAccept stack up against alternatives for teams building and signing into their own applications?</p>


<p>This guide breaks down every GetAccept pricing tier for 2026: eSign, Professional, and Enterprise. It covers what each plan includes, how add-ons affect the true cost, and where GetAccept pricing compares to alternatives when a different tool makes more sense.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>GetAccept&#8217;s current public pricing page lists <strong>eSign at $25/user/month</strong>, <strong>Professional at $49/user/month</strong> with a minimum of five users, and <strong>Enterprise</strong> with custom pricing via sales contact.</li>


<li>GetAccept promotes a <strong>free trial</strong> on its website with core feature access and no credit card required. No permanent free plan is listed on the public pricing page.</li>


<li><strong>eSign</strong> includes unlimited electronic signatures, in-app editing, simple branding, contract management, engagement video, automated reminders, chat functionality, and templates/content library.</li>


<li><strong>Professional</strong> includes GetAccept AI features, with unlimited AI content and AI contract management available as add-ons. CRM integrations are part of the Professional offering, with premium integrations available as add-ons.</li>


<li><strong>SSO/SAML</strong> is listed as an add-on for Professional. Buyers should confirm SCIM availability and Enterprise feature scope directly with GetAccept during the quote process.</li>


<li>For annual and longer contracts, GetAccept requires <strong>cancellation in writing at least 60 days before renewal</strong>. Annual plans automatically renew for another term if not canceled within that window.</li>


<li>For developers who need to <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embed legally</a> binding document signing into an application, Verdocs offers <strong>60+ native web components</strong>, open-source MIT SDKs, and a permanent free tier with <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong> and no per-seat minimum.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research GetAccept Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three scenarios account for most GetAccept pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>The Professional plan minimum creates budget friction for smaller teams.</strong> A three-person team that wants Professional features at $49 per user per month cannot buy three seats. The five-user minimum means they pay for seats they may not fill, bringing the annual floor to $2,940 per year before add-ons.</li>


<li><strong>The add-on structure is not fully transparent at first glance.</strong> Several capabilities buyers expect at the base price are listed separately, including unlimited AI content, AI contract management, premium CRM integrations, and SSO/SAML. Buyers should request an itemized quote from GetAccept before committing to understand the total cost picture.</li>


<li><strong>The 60-day cancellation window requires advance planning.</strong> For plans longer than one month, GetAccept requires cancellation in writing at least 60 days before renewal. Annual plans automatically renew if not canceled within that window, so teams benefit from noting the renewal date at the time of signing.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>GetAccept structures its public pricing across three tiers. eSign is self-serve with published pricing; Professional and Enterprise require annual billing, and Enterprise requires a sales conversation for a custom quote.</p>


<p><strong>eSign: $25/user/month</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited electronic signatures</li>


<li>In-app document editor for text and image modifications</li>


<li>Simple branding controls</li>


<li>Contract management for signed documents and renewal reminders</li>


<li>Engagement video and automated reminders</li>


<li>Chat functionality</li>


<li>Templates and content library</li>


<li>Monthly or annual billing available</li>


<li>Best for: Individuals and small teams needing core e-signatures</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Professional: $49/user/month (minimum 5 users, annual)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>All eSign features</li>


<li>GetAccept AI features included</li>


<li>Pricing table and product library (up to three products)</li>


<li>CRM integrations included; premium integrations available as add-ons</li>


<li>Unlimited AI content and AI contract management available as add-ons</li>


<li>SSO/SAML available as an add-on</li>


<li>Best for: Sales teams needing structured proposal and signing workflows with CRM connectivity</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise: Custom (contact sales)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>All Professional features</li>


<li>Full CPQ and unlimited product library</li>


<li>Custom pricing and contract terms</li>


<li>Dedicated customer success and advanced support</li>


<li>Best for: Large organizations with complex integration, compliance, or volume requirements</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Some in-account license options may reference Deal Room, Contract Room, or Full Suite when adding seats inside subscription settings. These are not shown as separate public price tiers on the current pricing page.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSign Plan: Features and What to Know</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $25/user/month</li>


<li><strong>Billing:</strong> Monthly or annual</li>


<li><strong>Minimum users:</strong> None</li>


<li><strong>Best for:</strong> Individuals and small teams, core e-signatures, no annual commitment required</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What eSign Includes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Unlimited electronic signatures</strong> with legally binding audit trails</li>


<li><strong>In-app document editor</strong> for text and image modifications directly within GetAccept</li>


<li><strong>Simple branding</strong> controls for templates and document styling</li>


<li><strong>Contract management</strong> for signed documents and renewal reminders</li>


<li><strong>Engagement video</strong> for recording walk-throughs alongside a proposal</li>


<li><strong>Automated reminders</strong> to follow up with signers without manual outreach</li>


<li><strong>Chat functionality</strong> for in-document communication</li>


<li><strong>Templates and content library</strong> for reusable document workflows</li>


<li><strong>Two-factor authentication (2FA)</strong> for signer identity verification</li>


<li><a href="https://www.gdpr.eu/"><strong>GDPR and eIDAS compliance</strong></a>, plus ESIGN and UETA, for teams operating under data protection requirements</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>The eSign plan fits individuals and small teams that need unlimited electronic signatures with flexible monthly billing. It is the only tier that avoids the five-user annual commitment, making it a practical starting point before evaluating whether Professional features are needed.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSign Pricing at Common Team Sizes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>1 user: $25/month ($300/year)</li>


<li>3 users: $75/month ($900/year)</li>


<li>5 users: $125/month ($1,500/year)</li>


<li>10 users: $250/month ($3,000/year)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Professional Plan: Features and What to Know</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $49/user/month</li>


<li><strong>Billing:</strong> Annual only</li>


<li><strong>Minimum users:</strong> 5</li>


<li><strong>Minimum annual cost:</strong> $2,940/year</li>


<li><strong>Best for:</strong> Sales teams needing AI features, CRM integrations, and structured proposal-to-signature workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Professional Includes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>All eSign plan features</li>


<li><strong>GetAccept AI features</strong> for content and workflow assistance</li>


<li><strong>Pricing table and product library</strong> with up to three products included; full CPQ and unlimited product library are at the Enterprise level</li>


<li><strong>CRM integrations</strong> included in the Professional plan; premium integrations (including Salesforce Native Integration and Microsoft Dynamics) are available as add-ons</li>


<li><strong>Unlimited AI content generation</strong> available as a paid add-on</li>


<li><strong>AI contract management</strong> is available as a paid add-on</li>


<li><strong>SSO/SAML</strong> available as a paid add-on</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Buyers should request an itemized quote from GetAccept before committing, as several capabilities are listed as add-ons rather than base features.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Professional is the right fit for sales teams that need CRM-connected document workflows, AI-assisted content, and structured proposal delivery. Teams sending five or more users can access the full Professional feature set at $49/user/month, billed annually.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Professional Pricing at Common Team Sizes</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5 users (minimum): $2,940/year ($245/month)</li>


<li>10 users: $5,880/year ($490/month)</li>


<li>15 users: $8,820/year ($735/month)</li>


<li>25 users: $14,700/year ($1,225/month)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan: Custom Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Enterprise pricing is custom and available by contacting GetAccept sales. This tier is built for organizations with complex integration, compliance, or volume requirements that go beyond the Professional plan&#8217;s scope.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Enterprise Adds</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>All Professional plan features</li>


<li><strong>Full CPQ</strong> and unlimited product library (vs. up to three products on Professional)</li>


<li><strong>Advanced identity and access management</strong> for enterprise security requirements (confirm specifics with GetAccept during the quote process)</li>


<li><strong>Dedicated customer success</strong> for onboarding, training, and expansion planning</li>


<li><strong>Custom contract terms</strong> including negotiated pricing, SLAs, and procurement support</li>


<li><strong>Advanced API access</strong> for custom workflow integrations</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Enterprise buyers should plan for a multi-step procurement process and use the free trial period to validate workflows before contracting.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept Free Trial</strong></h2>


<p>GetAccept offers a free trial with no credit card required. The trial includes access to core features such as documents, Deal Rooms, engagement analytics, e-signature, templates, the editor, and CRM integration.</p>


<p>At the end of the trial, the account either converts to a paid plan or becomes inactive. No permanent free plan is listed on the public pricing page. Teams that need ongoing low-volume e-signature access at no cost should evaluate platforms that offer a permanent free tier.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept Add-Ons</strong></h2>


<p>Several capabilities are listed as add-ons on GetAccept&#8217;s Professional plan. Buyers should request an itemized quote from GetAccept before committing to understand the full cost of their intended configuration.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Unlimited AI content generation:</strong> Included as a limited feature on Professional; unlimited volume is a paid add-on</li>


<li><strong>AI contract management:</strong> Available as a paid add-on on Professional</li>


<li><strong>Premium CRM integrations:</strong> Standard CRM connections are included on Professional; Salesforce Native Integration, Microsoft Dynamics, and other premium integrations are listed as add-ons in the feature comparison</li>


<li><strong>SSO/SAML:</strong> Listed as a paid add-on on Professional; confirm availability and scope with GetAccept during the quote process</li>


<li><strong>CPQ and unlimited product library:</strong> Full CPQ is at the Enterprise level; Professional includes pricing table components and up to three products</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept Cancellation Policy</strong></h2>


<p>For plans longer than one month, GetAccept requires cancellation in writing at least 60 days before the renewal date. Cancellations should be submitted to finance@getaccept.com. Annual plans automatically renew for another full term if not canceled within the required window.</p>


<p>Practical steps before signing:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Note the renewal date at contract signing and set a calendar reminder 70 to 75 days before it</li>


<li>Confirm what constitutes a valid written notice with your GetAccept account contact before signing</li>


<li>Verify the renewal date aligns with expectations, since it does not always fall on a calendar year boundary</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept vs. Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept vs. PandaDoc</strong></h3>


<p>PandaDoc focuses on proposal creation, document automation, and template management, with a published entry price point below GetAccept&#8217;s Professional tier. GetAccept&#8217;s Professional plan includes AI features and CRM-connected signing workflows as its primary differentiators. Teams comparing the two should evaluate which feature set maps more directly to their sales process.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept vs. DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>DocuSign is the established enterprise e-signature platform with broad compliance coverage and deep CRM integrations across Salesforce, Microsoft, and SAP ecosystems. GetAccept&#8217;s differentiation is its combined proposal, engagement analytics, and signing workflow versus DocuSign&#8217;s pure-play e-signature focus. Pricing models differ; both require direct contact for enterprise-level configuration.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>GetAccept vs. Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is an <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first eSignature platform</a> built for developers embedding document signing directly into their own applications. Where GetAccept is designed as a sales team portal, Verdocs is built to be invisible inside the product your team or your customers already use. Verdocs provides 60+ native web components with full CSS styling control, open-source SDKs under the MIT license for React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JavaScript, Node.js, and TypeScript, and a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and API access at no cost. SOC 2 Type I certified, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration (bring-your-own signing certificates), and PKI digital certificates. Verdocs delivers the signing experience without requiring iframes (iframes are also available when preferred). There is no per-seat minimum and no time-limited trial.</p>


<p><strong>Key comparison points:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Primary use case:</strong> Verdocs is built for <a href="https://verdocs.com/embeddable-esignature-platform/">embedded eSignature workflows</a> inside your own product; GetAccept is a sales engagement platform with e-signature as a core component</li>


<li><strong>Starting cost:</strong> Verdocs offers a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month; GetAccept eSign starts at $25/user/month with a free trial available</li>


<li><strong>Developer integration:</strong> Verdocs provides 60+ native web components; GetAccept is a portal-based tool accessed through its own interface</li>


<li><strong>White-label support:</strong> Full CSS control with no iframe requirement on Verdocs (iframes also available when preferred); GetAccept offers branding controls within its platform</li>


<li><strong>Framework support:</strong> Verdocs supports React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, and TypeScript; GetAccept integrates via API and CRM connectors</li>


<li><strong>Security:</strong> Verdocs is SOC 2 Type I certified, E-SIGN Act and UETA compliant, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration, and PKI digital certificates; GetAccept is <a href="https://www.gdpr.eu/">GDPR and eIDAS compliant</a>, plus ESIGN and UETA</li>


<li><strong>Open-source SDKs:</strong> Verdocs provides MIT-licensed open-source SDKs; GetAccept does not publish an open-source SDK</li>


<li><strong>Per-seat minimums:</strong> None on Verdocs; GetAccept Professional requires a minimum of five users annually</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Considerations on GetAccept</strong></h2>


<p>GetAccept provides API access for custom workflow integrations, with deeper API access available at the Enterprise level. The platform is designed for sales teams using a portal-based interface rather than for developers embedding signing natively into another application.</p>


<p>Teams building applications where users sign documents without leaving the product UI should evaluate platforms that ship pre-built <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embeddable web components</a>. GetAccept&#8217;s architecture is well-suited to standalone sales engagement workflows; it is not purpose-built for in-app embedding without custom front-end development.</p>


<p>Development teams evaluating GetAccept for programmatic signing should confirm API access scope and pricing directly with GetAccept&#8217;s sales team before beginning integration work.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>GetAccept&#8217;s pricing structure is well-matched to a specific buyer. Here is how to decide before a sales call.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing GetAccept:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For individuals and small teams needing core e-signatures:</strong> The eSign plan at $25/user/month with monthly billing provides unlimited signatures, templates, engagement video, and automated reminders without an annual commitment.</li>


<li><strong>For sales teams with CRM-connected workflows:</strong> Professional at $49/user/month includes GetAccept AI features and CRM integrations, with premium integrations and unlimited AI available as add-ons. The five-user minimum applies.</li>


<li><strong>For large organizations with complex requirements:</strong> Enterprise provides full CPQ, unlimited product library, dedicated customer success, and custom contract terms negotiated directly with GetAccept.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier, open-source SDKs under the MIT license, and no iframe requirement (iframes also available when preferred). GetAccept is designed as a sales portal, not an embeddable signing component.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, and real estate teams with regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific embedded eSignature with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The GetAccept platform delivers genuine value for sales teams using its proposal, engagement, and signing workflow end-to-end. When the requirement is embedding signing natively into your own product, evaluate a developer-first alternative before committing to a portal-based architecture.</p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Try Verdocs for free</a> and build embeddable eSignature workflows without per-user fees or iframe dependencies.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does GetAccept cost per month?</strong></h3>


<p>GetAccept pricing starts at $25 per user per month on the eSign plan, the only tier with monthly billing available. The Professional plan is $49/user/month billed annually, with a minimum of five users, putting the annual floor at $2,940/year. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting GetAccept sales directly.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does GetAccept offer a free plan?</strong></h3>


<p>GetAccept promotes a free trial on its website with no credit card required, covering core features including documents, e-signature, templates, the editor, and CRM integration. No permanent free plan is listed on the public pricing page. Teams that need ongoing free access should evaluate platforms with a permanent free tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the minimum spend on GetAccept Professional?</strong></h3>


<p>The Professional plan requires a minimum of five users billed annually at $49/user/month, bringing the annual floor to $2,940/year. Teams with fewer than five users who need Professional features will pay for the full five-seat minimum. Add-ons for unlimited AI content, premium CRM integrations, and SSO/SAML increase the total cost beyond the base rate.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How do I cancel my GetAccept subscription?</strong></h3>


<p>For plans longer than one month, GetAccept requires cancellation in writing at least 60 days before the renewal date, submitted to finance@getaccept.com. Annual plans automatically renew for another full term if not canceled within that window. Setting a calendar reminder 70 to 75 days before the renewal date and confirming the cancellation process at the time of signing are the most reliable ways to avoid automatic renewal.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the best alternative to GetAccept for developers?</strong></h3>


<p>For developers who need to embed legally binding document signing directly into their own application, <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is the purpose-built option. Verdocs provides 60+ native web components for React, Angular, Vue, and vanilla JavaScript, open-source MIT-licensed SDKs, a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and full API access, no per-seat minimum, and no credit card required to start. GetAccept is designed as a sales engagement portal rather than an embeddable signing component.</p>


<p></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/getaccept-pricing/">GetAccept Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apryse Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/apryse-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Apryse pricing is a quote-only model. Contract terms are negotiated directly with their sales team, and no public price list exists. According to Apryse, pricing depends on the features selected, document volume, and whether the deployment is server-side or client-side. Apryse says it can build custom packages starting as low as $1,500, but it does [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/apryse-pricing/">Apryse Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Apryse pricing is a quote-only model. Contract terms are negotiated directly with their sales team, and no public price list exists. According to Apryse, pricing depends on the features selected, document volume, and whether the deployment is server-side or client-side. Apryse says it can build custom packages starting as low as $1,500, but it does not publish public per-seat or per-server price bands.</p>


<p>Apryse uses modular pricing. Teams select the document SDK components and add-ons they need, such as viewing, annotation, redaction, digital signatures, OCR, data extraction, and other modules. Digital signature functionality is available through Apryse&#8217;s Digital Signature package, and production use requires the appropriate production packages.</p>


<p>This guide covers how Apryse pricing is structured, what to evaluate before a sales call, how Apryse compares to purpose-built eSignature APIs, and when each approach makes more sense for your team.</p>


<p><strong>How we evaluated Apryse pricing:</strong> We reviewed Apryse&#8217;s official website, pricing page, SDK documentation, and product announcements.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Apryse uses custom, modular pricing.</strong> Pricing depends on selected features, document volume, and whether deployment is server-side or client-side. Apryse says packages can start as low as $1,500, but no public per-seat or per-server price bands are published.</li>


<li><strong>Digital signature functionality</strong> is available through Apryse&#8217;s Digital Signature package. Production use requires the relevant production packages; trial keys have access to all features, including digital signatures.</li>


<li><strong>Support, implementation, training, and usage terms</strong> should be confirmed directly with Apryse during the quote process, as Apryse does not publish standard public pricing for these items.</li>


<li><strong>Volume-based discounts may apply.</strong> Buyers should ask Apryse directly how pricing changes based on feature scope, document volume, deployment model, and contract terms.</li>


<li><strong>Apryse provides a free trial</strong> with access to all SDK features for WebViewer digital signature evaluation. Server and Desktop SDK documentation describes a free 40-day evaluation based on active days.</li>


<li><strong>Apryse was formerly PDFTron,</strong> rebranding in 2023 following its acquisition of iText in April 2022.</li>


<li>For teams whose primary requirement is embedded document signing, Verdocs provides a free tier with <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong> and full API access, no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Apryse Pricing Requires a Sales Call</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse operates on a custom quote model by design. There is no self-serve pricing page, no checkout flow, and no way to see pricing without speaking to a sales representative. This approach is standard in enterprise developer tooling: it lets vendors calibrate pricing to the buyer&#8217;s team size, deployment model, and use case.</p>


<p>For developers building a budget estimate before an internal procurement review, this creates a real friction point. You need a number to justify the evaluation, but the number only comes after committing to a discovery call and describing your entire use case.</p>


<p>Three things to prepare before your first Apryse sales call:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Which modules does your use case require?</strong> Apryse offers modular add-ons, including viewing, annotation, redaction, digital signatures, OCR, and data extraction. Identify which capabilities your application needs before the call.</li>


<li><strong>Your deployment model.</strong> Whether you need server-side or client-side deployment is one of the primary factors Apryse uses to build a custom proposal.</li>


<li><strong>Your document volume.</strong> Document volume is another key pricing variable. Having a realistic projection for monthly or annual document processing volume will help Apryse size your proposal accurately.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Is Apryse? (and Why Pricing is Complex)</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse is a developer-focused platform for PDF processing, document viewing, editing, annotation, and digital signatures. Founded in 1998 as PDFTron, the company <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pdftron-rebrands-as-apryse-reflecting-expanded-product-offerings-and-commitment-to-innovation-301741548.html">rebranded as Apryse in 2023</a> following its acquisition of iText in April 2022. Following that acquisition, Apryse serves over 5,600 enterprise customers, according to its official announcement.</p>


<p>The platform supports 30+ file formats and runs across Web (JavaScript), iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux. Four primary products sit under the Apryse umbrella:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Apryse PDF SDK</strong> (formerly PDFTron SDK): cross-platform PDF processing library for embedding document capabilities into applications</li>


<li><strong>WebViewer</strong>: a fully client-side JavaScript Document SDK for viewing, annotation, conversion, and editing across 30+ formats</li>


<li><strong>iText by Apryse</strong>: server-side Java and C# PDF library with an open-source AGPL core, acquired in 2022</li>


<li><strong>Xodo</strong>: consumer PDF annotation app (separate from enterprise licensing)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The complexity in Apryse pricing comes from its modular architecture. You are not buying a single product at a single price. You are selecting capability modules, and pricing is built around features, deployment model, and document volume. Each of these dimensions is negotiated during the sales process.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Apryse Pricing Structure: Modular and Custom</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse uses modular pricing. Rather than fixed-named tiers, teams select the document SDK components and add-ons they need. Apryse says customers can select only the components required and add modules as needs change.</p>


<p>According to Apryse&#8217;s official pricing materials, packages can start as low as $1,500. Beyond that figure, Apryse does not publish standard public price bands. The final cost depends on:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Features selected:</strong> Modules include viewing, annotation, redaction, digital signatures, OCR, data extraction, and others. Each adds to the package cost.</li>


<li><strong>Deployment model:</strong> Whether the deployment is server-side or client-side is a primary pricing variable per Apryse&#8217;s official pricing page.</li>


<li><strong>Document volume:</strong> Document volume is factored into the custom proposal.</li>


<li><strong>Contract terms:</strong> Volume-based discounts may apply. Buyers should ask Apryse directly how pricing changes based on scope and term.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Digital Signature Functionality</strong></h3>


<p>Digital signature functionality is available through Apryse&#8217;s Digital Signature package. Apryse documentation states that trial keys have unlimited access to all features for WebViewer digital signature evaluation. Production use requires the relevant production packages. Buyers evaluating Apryse specifically for eSignature should confirm during the sales call which production packages are required for their signing use case.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Trial Access</strong></h3>


<p>Apryse provides free trial access. Apryse documentation states that trial keys have access to all features for WebViewer digital signature evaluation. Server and Desktop SDK documentation describes a free 40-day evaluation based on active days.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Add-On Modules and Services</strong></h3>


<p>Support, implementation, training, and usage terms should be confirmed directly with Apryse during the quote process. Apryse does not publish standard public pricing for these items. Teams should ask Apryse to detail how support tiers, professional services, and any usage-based components are structured before signing a contract.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Apryse Developer and Deployment Licensing</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse does not publish standard developer-seat or production-server pricing. The official pricing page confirms that pricing depends on features, document volume, and whether the deployment is server-side or client-side.</p>


<p>When requesting a quote, ask Apryse to specify:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>How developer access is licensed and whether it is tied to seat count, team size, or another unit</li>


<li>How production deployment is priced, whether per server, per CPU core, per container, or another model</li>


<li>Whether development, staging, QA, and production environments each require separate licensing</li>


<li>How document volume is factored into the proposal, and whether volume commitments change the pricing structure</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cloud API and Document Volume</strong></h3>


<p>Apryse says document volume is one factor in custom pricing. Teams evaluating cloud or server-side deployment should ask Apryse whether pricing is based on volume, deployment architecture, selected features, or other usage metrics. Request a volume-based quote to compare self-hosted and cloud deployment models against your projected usage.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Volume-Based Discounts</strong></h3>


<p>Apryse states that volume-based discounts may apply. Buyers should ask Apryse directly how pricing changes based on feature scope, document volume, deployment model, and contract terms. Renewal is also a productive moment for negotiation, particularly with alternatives under active consideration.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Apryse vs. Purpose-Built eSignature APIs</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse is a full-spectrum PDF processing SDK. It handles viewing, editing, annotation, conversion, redaction, and signing across 30+ formats and every major platform. For teams building applications that require all of those capabilities, the modular package delivers a comprehensive toolset in a single SDK.</p>


<p>For teams whose primary requirement is embedding legally binding document signing into an application, purpose-built eSignature APIs warrant a side-by-side evaluation before committing to an enterprise SDK contract.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Apryse vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is an <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first eSignature platform</a> purpose-built for developers embedding document signing directly into their own products. The platform provides 60+ native web components with full CSS styling control, open-source SDKs under the MIT license for React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JavaScript, Node.js, and TypeScript, and a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and API access at no cost. SOC 2 Type I certified, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration (bring-your-own signing certificates), and PKI digital certificates. Verdocs delivers the signing experience without requiring iframes (iframes also available when preferred).</p>


<p><strong>Key comparison points:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Primary use case:</strong> Verdocs is built for embedded eSignature workflows; Apryse covers full PDF processing plus signing as a module</li>


<li><strong>Starting cost:</strong> Verdocs offers a free tier with 25 envelopes per month; Apryse packages start as low as $1,500 per Apryse&#8217;s official pricing guide, with final cost depending on selected modules, deployment model, and document volume</li>


<li><strong>Developer integration:</strong> Verdocs provides 60+ native web components; Apryse&#8217;s WebViewer is a fully client-side JavaScript Document SDK for viewing, annotation, conversion, and editing across 30+ formats</li>


<li><strong>White-label support:</strong> Full CSS control with no iframe requirement on Verdocs (iframes also available when preferred); available on Apryse</li>


<li><strong>Framework support:</strong> Verdocs supports React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, and TypeScript; Apryse supports React, Angular, Vue, JS, .NET, Java, and Python</li>


<li><strong>Security:</strong> Verdocs is SOC 2 Type I certified, E-SIGN Act and UETA compliant, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration (bring-your-own signing certificates), and PKI digital certificates; Apryse provides enterprise-grade security</li>


<li><strong>Open-source SDKs:</strong> Verdocs provides MIT-licensed open-source SDKs; Apryse PDF SDK is proprietary (iText by Apryse retains AGPL v3 for qualifying projects)</li>


<li><strong>Per-developer seat fees:</strong> None on Verdocs; confirm structure with Apryse during quote</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/embeddable-esignature-platform/">Verdocs</a> delivers the complete document signing lifecycle through 60+ native web components with full CSS control and no iframe dependency. Teams building <a href="https://verdocs.com/build-custom-esignature-experiences/">custom eSignature</a> experiences on React, Angular, Vue, or vanilla JS integrate without iframes, own the complete UI experience, and eliminate per-developer seat fees entirely. <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks/">Open-source SDKs</a> under the MIT license give teams full visibility into the integration layer.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>When Does Apryse Make Sense (and When to Evaluate Alternatives)?</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse makes sense when your application needs full PDF processing across the complete spectrum. Teams focused primarily on embedded eSignature workflows typically find purpose-built eSignature APIs a more targeted fit.</p>


<p><strong>Teams that get the most value from Apryse:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Applications requiring full PDF processing: viewing, editing, annotation, redaction, conversion, and signing in a single SDK. If your roadmap includes all of these, the per-feature cost of building on Apryse may be better than assembling multiple point solutions.</li>


<li>Teams working across multiple platforms simultaneously (Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux) who need consistent PDF behavior across all of them. Apryse&#8217;s cross-platform coverage is a genuine differentiator for multi-platform products.</li>


<li>Use cases requiring deep PDF manipulation: complex form creation, PDF/A compliance certification, high-volume batch processing, and document transformation pipelines. iText by Apryse is particularly relevant for teams needing server-side Java or C# PDF processing.</li>


<li>Organizations with existing enterprise procurement processes that favor vendors with established certifications and a large enterprise customer base.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Teams that find purpose-built eSignature APIs a better fit:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Products where the core requirement is embedding legally binding document signing into an application, without a need for full PDF editing, conversion, or redaction. For these teams, purpose-built eSignature APIs start at no cost and scale on document volume rather than requiring a custom enterprise contract.</li>


<li>Teams that need to prototype a signing workflow and evaluate before committing to a multi-year contract. Apryse&#8217;s developer trial does include digital signatures, but production deployment requires a production package that must be confirmed with Apryse sales.</li>


<li>Products that require a fully white-labeled, natively integrated signing UI without iframes. Native web component-based eSignature APIs provide deeper UI control with a simpler integration path.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The practical evaluation framework: if your team needs PDF editing, annotation, conversion, and redaction alongside signing, Apryse delivers all of it in a single SDK. If your roadmap is signing-first and full PDF processing is not in scope, a purpose-built eSignature API typically offers faster integration, lower total cost, and a free tier for production evaluation. For a detailed side-by-side, see the <a href="https://verdocs.com/apryse-alternatives/"> Apryse alternatives</a> overview.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>Apryse is a mature, enterprise-grade PDF processing platform with genuine depth across viewing, editing, annotation, conversion, and signing. For teams that need all of those capabilities, the modular pricing reflects the breadth of the SDK, and teams with a comprehensive PDF processing requirement will find the feature set justifies the investment.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing Apryse:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For applications requiring full PDF processing:</strong> Apryse&#8217;s modular SDK covers viewing, editing, annotation, redaction, conversion, and signing in a single platform. Teams whose roadmap includes the full spectrum of PDF capabilities benefit from building on a single SDK rather than assembling multiple point solutions.</li>


<li><strong>For multi-platform products:</strong> Apryse&#8217;s cross-platform support across Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux is a genuine differentiator for teams that need consistent PDF behavior everywhere.</li>


<li><strong>For server-side Java and C# PDF pipelines:</strong> iText by Apryse is purpose-built for these use cases and is priced and licensed separately from the main Apryse PDF SDK.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong><a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier, open-source SDKs under the MIT license, and no iframe requirement (iframes also available when preferred).</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, and real estate teams with regulated document workflows:</strong><a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific embedded eSignature with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Try Verdocs for free</a> and build embeddable eSignature workflows without per-user fees or iframe dependencies.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does Apryse cost?</strong></h3>


<p>Apryse does not publish a price list. Pricing depends on the features selected, document volume, and whether the deployment is server-side or client-side. Apryse says packages can start as low as $1,500, but all contracts are built via a custom proposal from the Apryse sales team. Contact Apryse directly for a quote based on your specific use case and deployment model.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Apryse have a free plan?</strong></h3>


<p>Apryse does not offer a permanent free plan. Apryse provides free trial access, and documentation states that trial keys have access to all features for WebViewer digital signature evaluation. Server and Desktop SDK documentation describes a free 40-day evaluation based on active days. Production deployment of digital signature functionality requires the relevant production packages, which must be confirmed with Apryse during the quote process.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is Apryse the same as PDFTron?</strong></h3>


<p>Yes. Apryse <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pdftron-rebrands-as-apryse-reflecting-expanded-product-offerings-and-commitment-to-innovation-301741548.html">rebranded from PDFTron in 2023</a> following its acquisition of iText in April 2022. The underlying technology is continuous from the PDFTron era. Existing PDFTron licensing agreements transferred to Apryse at the time of rebranding.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is included in the Apryse free trial?</strong></h3>


<p>Apryse provides free trial access. Apryse documentation states that trial keys have access to all features for WebViewer digital signature evaluation. Server and Desktop SDK documentation describes a free 40-day evaluation based on active days. Production deployment requires the relevant production packages.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is iText by Apryse?</strong></h3>


<p>iText by Apryse is a server-side Java and C# PDF processing library that Apryse (then PDFTron) acquired in April 2022. It is a distinct product from the main Apryse PDF SDK and is priced and licensed separately. iText carries an open-source AGPL v3 license for qualifying projects and a commercial license for proprietary applications. Teams building server-side Java or C# PDF pipelines evaluate and purchase iText independently from the Apryse PDF SDK.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/apryse-pricing/">Apryse Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Docverify Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs, and Complete Breakdown</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/docverify-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Docverify pricing in 2026 starts at $24 per user per month for the Business E-Sign plan, $65 per user per month for the Enterprise E-Sign plan, and custom pricing for Enterprise Group accounts. Two facts buyers need to know before evaluating: API access is available through Docverify&#8217;s platform per ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s documentation, though the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/docverify-pricing/">Docverify Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs, and Complete Breakdown</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Docverify pricing in 2026 starts at $24 per user per month for the Business E-Sign plan, $65 per user per month for the Enterprise E-Sign plan, and custom pricing for Enterprise Group accounts. Two facts buyers need to know before evaluating: API access is available through Docverify&#8217;s platform per ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s documentation, though the official public page does not specify which paid tier includes API access, and users can create a free account through the Notary Portal, though a defined permanent free tier is not publicly confirmed on the reviewed page.</p>


<p>Docverify is now part of ICE Mortgage Technology (formerly Black Knight), which shapes its pricing model, roadmap, and go-to-market around the mortgage and real estate ecosystem rather than the broader general-purpose eSignature market. For teams evaluating Docverify on cost alone, this context matters as much as the dollar figures.</p>


<p>This guide covers every Docverify pricing tier, including what each plan includes, how annual billing compares to monthly billing, what changes were made after the Black Knight acquisition, and how Docverify costs compare to eSignature alternatives in 2026.</p>


<p><strong>How we evaluated Docverify pricing:</strong> We reviewed DocVerify&#8217;s official website and ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s DocVerify product page.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Docverify offers three subscription tiers: <strong>Business E-Sign</strong> ($24/user/month or $268/user/year), <strong>Enterprise E-Sign</strong> ($65/user/month or $760/user/year), and <strong>Enterprise Group</strong> (custom pricing).</li>


<li><strong>Annual billing</strong> saves $20 per user per year on both paid plans: approximately 6.9% off Business E-Sign and 2.6% off Enterprise E-Sign.</li>


<li><strong>RON and IPEN capabilities</strong> are supported by Docverify through ICE Mortgage Technology. Current public pricing for RON transaction fees is not disclosed on the official DocVerify/ICE product page; contact ICE Mortgage Technology for current RON transaction pricing.</li>


<li><strong>DocVerify offers APIs</strong> for integrating the e-signature process into applications. The official public page does not specify which paid tier includes API access; confirm API availability with ICE before selecting a plan.</li>


<li><strong>ICE&#8217;s DocVerify page</strong> states that users can create a free account and apply through the Notary Portal; it does not publicly confirm a defined permanent free plan or a 14-day Enterprise trial.</li>


<li><strong>Docverify integrates natively</strong> with Expedite Close, ICE&#8217;s eClosing solution, making it a natural fit for mortgage lenders already in that ecosystem.</li>


<li>For development teams building signing directly into their own applications, Verdocs provides a free tier with 25 envelopes per month and full API access, including 60+ native web components, with no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Buyers Research Docverify Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three buyer scenarios account for most Docverify pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>RON requirement evaluation.</strong> Teams that specifically need remote online notarization, particularly in mortgage closing, legal services, or real estate, look at Docverify because it is one of the established platforms with RON built into the platform rather than offered as a separately contracted add-on. Docverify sets the standard for RON, IPEN, and signature capabilities per ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s documentation.</li>


<li><strong>Platform consolidation within the ICE ecosystem.</strong> Organizations already using ICE Mortgage Technology or Black Knight products evaluate Docverify as the logical integrated eSign and RON component because of its native connection to Expedite Close and related mortgage tools. For these teams, the pricing question is also a question about integration depth and workflow efficiency.</li>


<li><strong>API and developer workflow assessment.</strong> Development teams researching Docverify for <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embedded document workflows</a> need to confirm API access and tier availability directly with ICE before modeling total cost against other options. Understanding whether Docverify&#8217;s platform fits a development or automation requirement, or whether API-first platforms with transparent self-serve developer tiers better fit the need, is a core part of the evaluation process.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>Docverify pricing covers three plans: Business E-Sign at $24 per user per month ($268 billed annually), Enterprise E-Sign at $65 per user per month ($760 billed annually), and Enterprise Group at custom negotiated pricing. RON notarization is supported across the platform. ICE&#8217;s DocVerify page states users can create a free account through the Notary Portal.</p>


<p>Here is a summary of all Docverify plans and costs as of 2026:</p>


<p><strong>Business E-Sign: $24/user/month (or $268/user/year)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Standard eSign document workflows</li>


<li>Multi-party signing support</li>


<li>Smart Tags for automatic field placement in PDFs</li>


<li>Full audit trail with timestamped records</li>


<li>Automated signer notifications and reminders</li>


<li>Supported file types: PDFs, Microsoft Office files, Adobe documents, images, and other formats</li>


<li>Best for: Teams needing a compliant eSign without programmatic integration requirements</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise E-Sign: $65/user/month (or $760/user/year)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Everything in Business E-Sign</li>


<li>API access for integrating the e-signature process into applications (confirm scope with ICE)</li>


<li>Deeper compliance tooling for regulated industries</li>


<li>Best for: Teams in the ICE Mortgage Technology ecosystem needing integration capabilities</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise Group: Custom pricing</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Fully custom pricing negotiated with ICE Mortgage Technology</li>


<li>Designed for large enterprises with high document and notarization volumes</li>


<li>Best for: Multi-site organizations, dedicated account management, custom SLAs</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Docverify plans at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Business E-Sign</strong> ($24/user/month or $268/year): Standard eSign workflows, Smart Tags, multi-party signing, audit trail, automated reminders</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise E-Sign</strong> ($65/user/month or $760/year): API access for application integration, deeper compliance tooling, and all Business features</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise Group</strong> (custom): Fully negotiated pricing, high-volume configuration, custom SLA, ICE ecosystem integration depth</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>No device beyond a browser and an internet connection is required for signers to complete documents.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business E-Sign Plan: Features and Cost Breakdown</strong></h2>


<p>The Business E-Sign plan costs $24 per user per month on monthly billing, or $268 per user per year on annual billing. This is Docverify&#8217;s entry-level tier covering core capabilities for standard electronic signature workflows.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $24/user/month (or $268/user/year)</li>


<li><strong>RON/IPEN:</strong> Supported through the platform</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Teams needing reliable, auditable eSign without complex programmatic integration</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Business E-Sign plan includes:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Document upload and preparation</strong> for electronic signature with recipient routing</li>


<li><strong>Multi-party signing support:</strong> a single document can be routed to multiple recipients simultaneously, each completing their signature in sequence or in parallel</li>


<li><strong>Smart Tags module:</strong> automatically places signature, initials, date, and custom fields in PDF documents based on pre-configured tag rules, reducing manual setup for recurring document types</li>


<li><strong>Full audit trail:</strong> timestamped records of every action on a document, including opens, completions, IP addresses, identity verification steps, and signature events</li>


<li><strong>Automated signer notifications and follow-up reminders</strong> for pending signatures</li>


<li><strong>Supported file types:</strong> PDFs, Microsoft Office files, Adobe documents, images, and other file types per ICE&#8217;s documentation</li>


<li><strong>No additional hardware or software required</strong> beyond a device, browser, and internet connection</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Teams that need reliable, auditable eSign functionality without programmatic integration requirements. Organizations in the mortgage, real estate, and legal verticals that operate within established ICE Mortgage Technology workflows.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise E-Sign Plan: Features and Cost Breakdown</strong></h2>


<p>Enterprise E-Sign costs $65 per user per month, or $760 per user per year on annual billing. This tier is designed for organizations with more demanding compliance requirements and the need to integrate the e-signature process into applications.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $65/user/month (or $760/user/year)</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> Available for integrating the e-signature process into applications (confirm scope with ICE Mortgage Technology)</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Teams building application integrations within the ICE Mortgage Technology ecosystem</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What Enterprise E-Sign adds over Business E-Sign:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>API integration:</strong> DocVerify APIs support integrating the e-signature process into applications; confirm specific capabilities and tier scope with ICE Mortgage Technology</li>


<li><strong>Deeper compliance tooling</strong> suited to regulated industries including mortgage, financial services, and legal</li>


<li><strong>Native integration with Expedite Close:</strong> ICE&#8217;s eClosing solution connects directly with Docverify for mortgage digital closing workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>At $65 per user per month, cost scales directly with headcount. A five-user team pays $325 per month; a 10-user team pays $650 per month. Teams building automated workflows should model cost based on actual user seats required for administration, since per-seat pricing applies to licensed users rather than transaction volume.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Organizations within the ICE Mortgage Technology ecosystem integrating Docverify with loan origination systems, compliance platforms, and Expedite Close components. Teams in mortgage, financial services, and legal with compliance-sensitive workflows.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Group: Custom Pricing for Large Enterprises</strong></h2>


<p>Enterprise Group pricing is negotiated directly with ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s enterprise sales team. This tier is designed for large enterprises processing high document and notarization volumes, multi-site organizations, and teams that need dedicated account management, custom SLAs, and deep integration within the ICE Mortgage Technology platform.</p>


<p>Custom pricing at the Enterprise Group tier typically accounts for:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Annual envelope and document volume</li>


<li>Number of users and organizational structure</li>


<li>RON and IPEN session volume and recording requirements</li>


<li>Integration depth with the ICE Mortgage Technology platform components</li>


<li>Support tier commitments and response time SLAs</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Organizations at this tier typically receive volume-based rates that reduce per-unit costs compared to the standard rate card. Because Docverify is no longer an independent product, Enterprise Group purchasing follows ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s enterprise procurement process, which is consultative rather than self-serve.</p>


<p>Teams evaluating Enterprise Group should expect a formal sales engagement and build time for onboarding and integration alongside licensing costs.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify Free Account and Trial Access</strong></h2>


<p>ICE&#8217;s DocVerify page states that users can create a free account and apply through the Notary Portal. The official public page does not confirm a 14-day Enterprise trial or define a permanent free tier with ongoing full-feature access. Teams seeking to evaluate the platform before committing to a paid plan should contact ICE Mortgage Technology directly to understand what trial or pilot access is available.</p>


<p>For teams that need to evaluate eSignature API integration before entering a procurement process, self-serve developer tiers offer a faster path. <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">Verdocs</a> provides a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and full API access, including 60+ native web components, with no credit card required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Annual vs Monthly Billing: Docverify&#8217;s Discount Structure</strong></h2>


<p>Docverify offers annual billing as an alternative to monthly billing on both the Business E-Sign and Enterprise E-Sign plans.</p>


<p><strong>Business E-Sign:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Monthly billing: $24/user/month ($288/user/year total)</li>


<li>Annual billing: $268/user/year</li>


<li>Annual savings: $20 per user per year (approximately 6.9% discount)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise E-Sign:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Monthly billing: $65/user/month ($780/user/year total)</li>


<li>Annual billing: $760/user/year</li>


<li>Annual savings: $20 per user per year (approximately 2.6% discount)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The annual discount is modest on both plans. For Enterprise E-Sign in particular, the savings represent less than 3% of the yearly cost. Teams already committed to long-term Docverify usage benefit from a small cost reduction with annual billing. Teams still evaluating the platform or expecting user count changes will find the monthly option provides flexibility with only a small price premium.</p>


<p><strong>Multi-user annual savings at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5 users: $100/year saved on either plan</li>


<li>10 users: $200/year saved on either plan</li>


<li>25 users: $500/year saved on either plan</li>


<li>50 users: $1,000/year saved on either plan</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>At larger scales, the absolute dollar savings from annual billing become meaningful even as the percentage discount remains small.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify RON and IPEN Capabilities</strong></h2>


<p>Docverify supports<a href="https://www.nationalnotary.org/knowledge-center/news/law-library/remote-online-notarization"> remote online notarization</a> (RON) and in-person electronic notarization (IPEN) through ICE Mortgage Technology. ICE describes DocVerify as setting the standard for RON, IPEN, and signature capabilities. These capabilities make Docverify a meaningful option for mortgage lenders, licensed notaries, and real estate professionals who need both standard eSign and notarization from a single platform.</p>


<p>Current public pricing for RON transaction fees is not disclosed on the official DocVerify/ICE product page. Contact ICE Mortgage Technology directly for current RON transaction pricing, session recording requirements, and any identity verification add-on costs applicable to your state&#8217;s RON statute.</p>


<p>Teams modeling total Docverify cost should request a full breakdown from ICE before comparing Docverify to alternatives, particularly if RON volume is a significant part of the anticipated workflow.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify API Pricing and Developer Access</strong></h2>


<p>DocVerify APIs allow customers to integrate the e-signature process into their own applications. The official public page does not specify which paid tier includes API access. Teams evaluating Docverify for programmatic integration should confirm API availability, supported operations, and tier requirements directly with ICE Mortgage Technology before finalizing a plan selection.</p>


<p><strong>What the Docverify API supports (per ICE documentation):</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Integration of the e-signature process into applications</li>


<li>The Easy Sign System add-on can support signing from a website or mobile application</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Teams building customer-facing signing experiences into their own applications should also evaluate the embed model.<a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> Verdocs</a> provides 60+ native web components styled with standard CSS for React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JavaScript, Node.js, and TypeScript, with open-source SDKs under the MIT license and API access available on the free tier with no upfront commitment.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify Security and Compliance Standards</strong></h2>


<p>Docverify operates within a security framework designed for financial services, mortgage, and legal use cases. Key compliance and technical capabilities include:</p>


<p><strong>Legal compliance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>eSignatures are legally binding under the <a href="https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/compliance/manual/10/X-3.1.pdf">U.S. ESIGN Act</a> and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA)</li>


<li>RON capabilities are designed to comply with applicable state-level remote online notarization statutes, including identity verification and session recording requirements where mandated</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Technical security:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Advanced encryption for documents and signatures in transit and at rest</li>


<li>Cryptographically verified audit trail capturing every action on a document: views, signature events, IP addresses, device information, and timestamps</li>


<li>Identity verification for RON sessions includes multi-factor confirmation steps as required by applicable state RON statutes</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>For organizations operating under mortgage regulatory frameworks, Docverify&#8217;s integration within the ICE Mortgage Technology platform provides alignment with the compliance infrastructure already present in that ecosystem.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify Pricing After the Black Knight Acquisition</strong></h2>


<p>Black Knight acquired Docverify in 2020 to integrate RON capabilities into its mortgage technology stack. Per <a href="https://www.housingwire.com/articles/black-knight-acquires-docverify-to-boost-ron-capabilities/">HousingWire</a>, the transaction positioned Black Knight as one of the few mortgage technology providers with a native RON solution. ICE subsequently acquired Black Knight, bringing Docverify under the ICE Mortgage Technology umbrella and its Expedite Close digital closing platform.</p>


<p>These transitions produced observable changes in how Docverify is positioned and distributed:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Distribution and go-to-market:</strong> Docverify is no longer primarily marketed as a standalone general-purpose eSignature tool. Its sales and marketing focus is centered on ICE Mortgage Technology customers: mortgage lenders, servicers, and real estate professionals. Organizations outside that vertical may encounter a more consultation-oriented purchasing experience.</li>


<li><strong>Product roadmap:</strong> As part of a large enterprise technology company, Docverify&#8217;s feature development aligns with ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s mortgage workflow priorities. Product updates are driven by that vertical&#8217;s compliance and workflow requirements rather than the broader eSignature software market.</li>


<li><strong>Support structure:</strong> Customer support, billing inquiries, and account management are handled through ICE Mortgage Technology rather than an independent Docverify team.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>For teams evaluating Docverify fresh, the acquisition context means the product&#8217;s trajectory is tied to mortgage industry dynamics rather than general eSign market developments, which is either a feature or a constraint depending on the buying organization&#8217;s vertical.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify Pricing vs eSignature Alternatives</strong></h2>


<p>Buyers evaluating Docverify typically compare it against eSignature platforms at similar price points. The most meaningful comparison factors are starting price, free tier availability, API access entry point, RON support, and the embed model.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is an <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first eSignature platform</a> built for development teams embedding signing directly into their own products. The platform provides 60+ native web components with full CSS styling control, open-source SDKs under the MIT license for React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JavaScript, Node.js, and TypeScript, and a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and API access at no cost. SOC 2 Type I certified, with 2048-bit RSA encryption, modular HSM integration (bring-your-own signing certificates), and PKI digital certificates. Verdocs delivers the signing experience without requiring iframes (iframes also available when preferred).</p>


<p>Docverify&#8217;s strength is its RON and IPEN capability and native integration with Expedite Close for mortgage workflows. Verdocs&#8217; strength is developer control, native component architecture, and a self-serve free tier for API evaluation.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify vs DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>DocuSign&#8217;s entry-level plan is priced below Docverify&#8217;s Business E-Sign rate, and DocuSign offers broader vertical coverage and a larger enterprise integration ecosystem. Docverify&#8217;s value is specific to mortgage and real estate workflows with built-in RON and IPEN, an area where DocuSign requires additional configuration or add-ons. Sources vary by channel and region.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Docverify vs Dropbox Sign</strong></h3>


<p>Dropbox Sign&#8217;s starting price is below Docverify&#8217;s Business E-Sign rate and includes API access on business-tier plans. Docverify offers native RON and IPEN support that Dropbox Sign does not include. For teams specifically requiring notarization alongside eSign, Docverify&#8217;s integrated approach is a differentiator. Sources vary by channel and region.</p>


<p><strong>Key comparison points:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Verdocs:</strong> Free tier with 25 envelopes/month and API access; native web components; no iframe required; SOC 2 Type I; open-source MIT SDKs</li>


<li><strong>Docverify:</strong> RON and IPEN support; native Expedite Close integration; mortgage-vertical focus; confirm API tier with ICE</li>


<li><strong>DocuSign:</strong> Broad vertical coverage; larger integration ecosystem; RON available as an add-on; sources vary by channel and region</li>


<li><strong>Dropbox Sign:</strong> REST API on business plans; no native RON; lower starting price; sources vary by channel and region</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who Is Docverify Best Suited For?</strong></h2>


<p>Based on Docverify&#8217;s capabilities, pricing model, and positioning within the ICE Mortgage Technology ecosystem, here is a practical fit assessment.</p>


<p><strong>Docverify is a strong fit for:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Mortgage lenders and servicers already operating within the ICE Mortgage Technology platform stack, where Docverify&#8217;s integration into Expedite Close delivers workflow efficiency that standalone eSign tools cannot match through the same native connection</li>


<li>Licensed notaries and notary signing agents who need a compliant RON platform with established legal standing in RON-enabled states</li>


<li>Real estate and legal teams that require combined eSign and notarization from a single vendor, reducing the overhead of managing separate contracts and integrations for each capability</li>


<li>Compliance-sensitive industries in the mortgage vertical where Docverify&#8217;s alignment with ICE Mortgage Technology&#8217;s broader compliance infrastructure is a direct operational benefit</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Teams with different priorities will find a better fit elsewhere:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Development teams building customer-facing signing experiences into their own applications will get more control from an <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first platform</a> with native embeddable components, open-source SDKs, and a transparent self-serve free developer tier</li>


<li>Small businesses and startups that prefer to evaluate eSign tools through self-serve free plans before committing to a paid subscription will find a wider selection among platforms with confirmed permanent free tiers</li>


<li>General-purpose organizations outside real estate and mortgage that do not benefit from ICE ecosystem integration may find the platform&#8217;s vertical focus adds overhead without a corresponding workflow benefit</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>Docverify pricing is structured for a specific buyer profile: organizations in the mortgage and real estate verticals that need both eSign and RON from a single platform, particularly teams already embedded in the ICE Mortgage Technology ecosystem.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing Docverify:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For mortgage lenders and servicers within the ICE Mortgage Technology ecosystem:</strong> Docverify is the natural fit. Its native integration with Expedite Close and built-in RON and IPEN eliminates the need for separate vendor relationships for eSign and notarization.</li>


<li><strong>For licensed notaries processing consistent RON volume:</strong> Docverify is one of the established platforms with a compliant RON capability, legal standing in RON-enabled states, and session recording support built in.</li>


<li><strong>For teams needing application integration:</strong> Confirm API access, tier requirements, and supported operations directly with ICE Mortgage Technology before selecting a plan.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier, and open-source SDKs under the MIT license. The signing experience requires no iframes (iframes are also available when preferred), giving development teams complete control over how signing appears inside their product.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, and real estate teams with regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific embedded eSignature with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Start for free</a> and build fully embeddable eSignature workflows in your application.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is Docverify used for?</strong></h3>


<p>Docverify is an electronic signature and remote online notarization (RON) platform used primarily in mortgage, real estate, legal, and financial services. Organizations use it to send documents for legally binding eSignature, conduct notarization sessions, and manage compliance-sensitive signing workflows. Since its acquisition by Black Knight and subsequent integration under ICE Mortgage Technology, Docverify operates as part of the Expedite Close digital closing platform.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does Docverify cost per month?</strong></h3>


<p>Docverify pricing starts at $24 per user per month for the Business E-Sign plan. The Enterprise E-Sign plan costs $65 per user per month. Enterprise Group pricing is custom and negotiated directly with ICE Mortgage Technology. RON and IPEN are supported through the platform; contact ICE Mortgage Technology for current transaction pricing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Docverify offer a free account or free trial?</strong></h3>


<p>ICE&#8217;s DocVerify page states that users can create a free account and apply through the Notary Portal. The official page does not publicly confirm a 14-day Enterprise trial or define a permanent full-feature free tier. Contact ICE Mortgage Technology to understand what evaluation access is available. For teams that prefer a self-serve free tier before committing to a paid plan,<a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/apiplans/">Verdocs</a> offers 25 envelopes per month with full API access at no cost.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How do Business E-Sign and Enterprise E-Sign plans differ?</strong></h3>


<p>Business E-Sign ($24/user/month) covers standard eSign workflows: document sends, multi-party signing, Smart Tags automatic field placement, audit trails, and automated reminders. Enterprise E-Sign ($65/user/month) adds API access for integrating the e-signature process into applications and deeper compliance tooling. Confirm which specific features and API capabilities are included at each tier directly with ICE Mortgage Technology before selecting a plan.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How does Docverify&#8217;s RON pricing work?</strong></h3>


<p>Docverify supports RON and IPEN through ICE Mortgage Technology. Current public pricing for RON transaction fees is not disclosed on the official DocVerify/ICE product page. Contact ICE Mortgage Technology directly for current RON transaction pricing, session recording requirements, and any identity verification costs applicable to your state&#8217;s RON statute.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/docverify-pricing/">Docverify Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs, and Complete Breakdown</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SimplyAgree Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/simplyagree-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SimplyAgree pricing is not publicly listed. The platform uses a custom-quote model; its website states annual subscription pricing with unlimited usage and directs prospective customers to request a demo. No plan tiers, per-user rates, or monthly figures are published publicly. The cost is determined through a sales engagement and scoped to the firm&#8217;s specific requirements. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/simplyagree-pricing/">SimplyAgree Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>SimplyAgree pricing is not publicly listed. The platform uses a custom-quote model; its website states annual subscription pricing with unlimited usage and directs prospective customers to request a demo. No plan tiers, per-user rates, or monthly figures are published publicly. The cost is determined through a sales engagement and scoped to the firm&#8217;s specific requirements.</p>


<p>SimplyAgree is a signature and closing management platform purpose-built for transactional attorneys. It automates signature packet generation, real-time document compilation, exhibit management, and same-day closing binder delivery for M&amp;A, commercial real estate, venture capital, and banking and lending workflows. SimplyAgree says nearly 40% of the most active U.S. deal firms rely on its platform, citing VC, PE, and M&amp;A deal-volume data from PitchBook&#8217;s 2022 Annual Global League Tables. It supports cloud, private cloud, and on-premises deployment options and publicly lists integrations with NetDocs, iManage, and DocuSign.</p>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s custom-quote model raises practical questions for teams beginning an evaluation. What does the pricing conversation involve? How does SimplyAgree compare in cost to general eSignature platforms and legal closing alternatives? When does a developer-first alternative make more sense than a purpose-built closing tool? This guide covers SimplyAgree&#8217;s pricing model, what the platform includes, and how it compares to DocuSign, Adobe Sign, PandaDoc, and API-first alternatives built for embedded document workflows.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>SimplyAgree does not publish plan tiers or prices on its website. Its website states <strong>annual subscription pricing with unlimited usage</strong>; prospective customers are directed to request a demo.</li>


<li>SimplyAgree supports <strong>cloud, private cloud, and on-premises</strong> deployment options and publicly lists integrations with NetDocs, iManage, and DocuSign.</li>


<li>Public API availability and packaging are not disclosed on SimplyAgree&#8217;s website; confirmed integrations with NetDocs, iManage, and DocuSign are listed.</li>


<li>SimplyAgree says <strong>nearly 40% of the most active U.S. deal firms</strong> rely on its platform, citing data from PitchBook&#8217;s 2022 Annual Global League Tables.</li>


<li>No free tier or self-serve trial is available; all access requires a sales engagement and demo.</li>


<li>Competitor pricing for reference: DocuSign Personal is <strong>$10/month</strong>, Standard is <strong>$25/user/month</strong>, and Business Pro is <strong>$40/user/month</strong> (billed annually); Adobe Acrobat Standard for teams is <strong>$16.99/license/month,</strong> and Acrobat Pro for teams is <strong>$23.99/license/month</strong> (annual, billed monthly).</li>


<li>For development teams building embedded signing into their own applications, Verdocs provides a self-serve free tier with full API access, <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong>, and 60+ native web components with no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research SimplyAgree Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three buyer scenarios account for most SimplyAgree pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>No public pricing to evaluate.</strong> SimplyAgree&#8217;s website does not list plan tiers, per-user rates, or price ranges. Teams trying to assess fit before a sales conversation have no published number to work from. Understanding what the pricing model involves and what to expect in a demo is the most common reason buyers research this page.</li>


<li><strong>Closing workflow vs. general eSignature comparison.</strong> SimplyAgree is closing management software with eSignature built in, not a general eSignature platform. Teams evaluating it alongside DocuSign or Adobe Sign need to understand the category difference before comparing costs: SimplyAgree automates the full closing workflow from signature packet generation through same-day binder delivery, which general platforms require significant manual process to replicate.</li>


<li><strong>Developer and embedded workflow requirements.</strong> Product teams and developers embedding document signing into their own applications often arrive at SimplyAgree before realizing it is a law-firm-first tool rather than an API-first platform. Platforms with <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> and permanent free tiers are better suited to that evaluation path.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>This guide answers all three before you need to contact sales.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree Pricing Model in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree uses a custom-quote, annual subscription model. No plan tiers or prices are published on its website. All access requires a demo request and a sales engagement.</p>


<p>Here is what SimplyAgree publicly states about its pricing and deployment:</p>


<p><strong>Annual Subscription (all accounts)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Annual subscription pricing with unlimited usage</li>


<li>No plan tiers or per-user rates publicly disclosed</li>


<li>Cloud, private cloud, and on-premises deployment options are supported</li>


<li>Best for: Transactional law firms managing M&amp;A, commercial real estate, venture capital, and banking and lending closings</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Confirmed integrations (all accounts):</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>NetDocs and iManage document management system integrations</li>


<li>DocuSign integration for electronic signing</li>


<li>Public API availability and packaging not disclosed on the website</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>SimplyAgree pricing model at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Pricing:</strong> Annual subscription, unlimited usage, custom quote required</li>


<li><strong>Deployment:</strong> Cloud, private cloud, or on-premises</li>


<li><strong>Integrations:</strong> NetDocs, iManage, DocuSign (confirmed); API packaging not publicly disclosed</li>


<li><strong>Free trial:</strong> Not available; sales demo required for all access</li>


<li><strong>Target:</strong> Transactional attorneys at law firms handling high-volume deal closings</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>SimplyAgree does not disclose how quotes are calculated publicly. Teams entering the sales process should prepare with firm-size details and workflow requirements to receive an accurate proposal. The annual subscription with the unlimited usage model means the cost is not tied to per-document volume once contracted.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Is SimplyAgree?</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree is a signature and closing management platform for transactional attorneys, built specifically to automate the most time-consuming parts of a deal closing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Pricing:</strong> Custom quote (contact SimplyAgree for demo)</li>


<li><strong>Usage:</strong> Annual subscription with unlimited usage</li>


<li><strong>Deployment:</strong> Cloud, private cloud, on-premises</li>


<li><strong>Integrations:</strong> NetDocs, iManage, DocuSign</li>


<li><strong>Free Trial:</strong> Not available</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Transactional law firms managing multi-party deal closings at scale</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What SimplyAgree includes:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>eSigning and signature packets:</strong> generate and distribute signature packets to all parties for electronic or handwritten execution</li>


<li><strong>InstaPage signature page generation:</strong> SimplyAgree says InstaPages automatically creates formatted signature pages for signatories and supports one-click signature page creation</li>


<li><strong>Document compilation:</strong> automatically compile executed documents into organized transaction files</li>


<li><strong>Exhibit management:</strong> link exhibits to source documents so changes to the underlying document update the corresponding exhibit</li>


<li><strong>Closing binders:</strong> compile and deliver fully executed closing binders on the day of closing with branded delivery options</li>


<li><strong>Signature pages:</strong> manage individual signature pages across multi-party, multi-document transactions</li>


<li><strong>Client signing without account creation:</strong> signers complete execution from any device using a delivery link, without registering for the platform</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Closing Workflow in Practice</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s core value is automating the end-to-end closing workflow that transactional attorneys manage manually on general eSignature platforms. The sequence from signature packet generation through same-day closing binder delivery is handled within the platform rather than coordinated across separate tools. For practices managing dozens of simultaneous signers and hundreds of documents, the automation addresses the operational complexity that general platforms do not.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Transactional law firms managing M&amp;A, commercial real estate, venture capital, and banking and lending closings at scale. SimplyAgree says hundreds of transactional law practices use the platform to manage signatures, compile documents and exhibits, and produce closing binders on the day of closing. Firms that need cloud, private cloud, or on-premises deployment flexibility for data residency or security requirements.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree Features: Closing Workflow</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s feature set centers on four functional areas used throughout a deal lifecycle.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Signature Page Generation</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s InstaPage tool generates formatted signature pages automatically from source documents. SimplyAgree says InstaPages supports one-click signature page creation for all signatories across a transaction. Teams no longer need to manually create individual signature packets for each party; InstaPage produces the full signature packet set, including cover pages, multiple copies, and signer-specific instructions.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Signature Packet Distribution</strong></h3>


<p>Once signature pages are generated, SimplyAgree distributes them to each signer. Signers can execute documents electronically or with a handwritten signature. Electronic signatures can be legally valid under applicable laws such as ESIGN and UETA in the U.S.; legal effect depends on jurisdiction, transaction type, and implementation. Signers do not need a SimplyAgree account to participate, they access the signing workflow directly from the delivery link.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Real-Time Document Compilation</strong></h3>


<p>As signers execute documents, SimplyAgree compiles the executed versions in real time. When a document moves from draft to execution, SimplyAgree automatically updates the file while preserving signature pages and linked exhibits. Real-time compilation is relevant for large transactions with dozens of documents and simultaneous signers, where tracking executed versions across a file set is managed by the platform.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Closing Binder Delivery</strong></h3>


<p>At closing, SimplyAgree compiles the fully executed closing binder and delivers it to the client on the day of closing. The branded binder includes all executed documents organized by category, delivered digitally rather than compiled manually after the fact.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree Free Trial and Demo Process</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree does not offer a free tier or self-serve free trial. All access requires a demo request and sales engagement.</p>


<p><strong>Demo process specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Access:</strong> Request a demo via SimplyAgree&#8217;s website to begin the evaluation process</li>


<li><strong>Free trial:</strong> Not available; no self-serve account creation</li>


<li><strong>Sales engagement:</strong> Demo call followed by a scoping conversation and tailored proposal</li>


<li><strong>Timeline:</strong> Standard deployments typically move in one to two weeks after initial demo; multi-office or on-premises requirements extend the timeline</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Teams that need to prototype integrations or validate developer experience before a procurement decision should evaluate platforms with self-serve access. SimplyAgree&#8217;s onboarding is designed around the enterprise sales process.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree&#8217;s Custom-Quote Pricing Model</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s annual subscription model with unlimited usage is standard for enterprise legal technology. The custom-quote process allows the platform to scope pricing to each firm&#8217;s specific requirements rather than applying a fixed per-user or per-document rate.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What the Pricing Model Means in Practice</strong></h3>


<p>Annual subscription with unlimited usage means that once contracted, document volume within the platform is not capped per user per month. This structure suits high-volume transactional practices where per-document pricing would compound unpredictably across large closing portfolios.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What the Demo Process Covers</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s sales process begins with a demo call. Teams should prepare with details on the number of transactional attorneys who will use the platform, the practice areas to be supported, closing volume, and any deployment preferences (cloud vs. private cloud vs. on-premises). A proposal is prepared after the scoping conversation.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deployment Options and Their Impact</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree publicly supports cloud, private cloud, and on-premises deployment. Firms with data residency requirements or security policies that restrict cloud-hosted legal documents can use on-premises deployment. The deployment choice is part of the scoping conversation and affects the implementation scope included in the proposal.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree vs Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree vs DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree and DocuSign serve different buyer profiles. DocuSign is a general-purpose eSignature platform with published per-user pricing: Personal at $10/month, Standard at $25/user/month, and Business Pro at $40/user/month, all billed annually. Standard and Business Pro annual plans include up to 100 envelopes per user per year. DocuSign includes 400+ pre-built integrations and a broad enterprise feature catalog suited to general signing workflows across verticals. SimplyAgree is a closing management software with eSignature built in, designed specifically for the transactional attorney&#8217;s workflow from signature packet generation through same-day binder delivery. The two platforms are not direct substitutes; the right comparison for SimplyAgree is against other legal closing management tools.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree vs Adobe Sign</strong></h3>


<p>Adobe Acrobat for Teams is a general-purpose eSignature platform well-suited for organizations in the Adobe ecosystem. Current pricing is Acrobat Standard for teams at $16.99/license/month and Acrobat Pro for teams at $23.99/license/month, annual billed monthly. Like DocuSign, Adobe Sign is a general eSignature platform rather than a purpose-built closing management tool. Teams choosing between SimplyAgree and Adobe Sign are typically choosing between a specialized closing workflow platform and a general-purpose signing tool, not between equivalent feature sets.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree vs PandaDoc</strong></h3>


<p>PandaDoc combines eSignature with proposal management, CPQ, and CRM-native document workflows. Current pricing is Free at $0/month (60 documents/year), Starter at $19/month billed annually, and Business at $49/seat/month billed annually. Enterprise pricing is per-seat or per-document with custom quotes; API access is available at the Enterprise tier with custom API pricing that includes an Enterprise license fee plus transaction volume. PandaDoc is designed for revenue teams managing sales document workflows rather than transactional attorneys managing deal closings.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is the most developer-focused <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embeddable eSignature platform</a> for teams building signing directly into their own applications. Verdocs is built on an API-first design with 60+ native web components (React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, TypeScript) and full CSS control for white-label in-app signing. Verdocs supports both native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. Open-source SDKs (MIT license), SOC 2 Type I certification, 2048-bit RSA encryption, HSM key storage, and PKI digital certificates address the security and compliance requirements that development teams verify before integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes full API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Considerations on SimplyAgree</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree publicly lists integrations with NetDocs, iManage, and DocuSign. Public API availability and packaging are not disclosed on SimplyAgree&#8217;s website. Teams evaluating SimplyAgree for programmatic or embedded document workflows should raise API requirements during the demo and scoping process.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What SimplyAgree Publicly Lists for Integrations</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>NetDocs integration for document management system connectivity</li>


<li>iManage integration for firms using iManage as their DMS</li>


<li>DocuSign integration as an electronic signing layer within the closing workflow</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree is a closing management tool designed for transactional attorneys using the platform directly, not a developer API for embedding signing into third-party applications. Product teams and developers building document signing natively into their own applications are outside SimplyAgree&#8217;s primary design target. Development teams should factor the demo-required evaluation process into their timeline. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> provide faster time-to-prototype for teams that need to build before entering procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SimplyAgree in Legal Closing Workflows</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s strongest differentiation is its purpose-built closing workflow for transactional attorneys, in a category where general eSignature platforms require significant manual process to achieve equivalent output.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Practice Areas Supported</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree supports the following transactional practice areas:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>M&amp;A (mergers and acquisitions)</li>


<li>Commercial real estate</li>


<li>Banking and lending</li>


<li>Venture capital</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Market Position</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree says nearly 40% of the most active U.S. deal firms rely on its platform, citing VC, PE, and M&amp;A deal-volume data from PitchBook&#8217;s 2022 Annual Global League Tables. The platform says hundreds of transactional law practices use it to manage signatures, compile documents and exhibits, and produce closing binders on the day of closing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Legal Closing Automation Means for Cost</strong></h3>


<p>For law firms managing high-volume deal closings, the operational efficiency of automating signature packet generation, document compilation, and closing binder delivery reduces associate time spent on administrative closing coordination. The annual subscription with an unlimited usage model means that the cost does not scale with document volume once contracted, which suits practices with large and variable closing portfolios. Teams should model expected usage against the annual contract cost during the demo process.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>SimplyAgree&#8217;s pricing model is well-matched for a specific buyer. Here is how to decide without a sales call.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing SimplyAgree:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For transactional law firms managing M&amp;A, commercial real estate, or venture capital closings:</strong> SimplyAgree is purpose-built for exactly this workflow. The closing management infrastructure, from InstaPage signature packet generation through same-day branded binder delivery, addresses the operational complexity of high-volume deal closings in ways that general eSignature platforms do not replicate without significant manual process.</li>


<li><strong>For firms with data residency or security requirements:</strong> SimplyAgree&#8217;s on-premises and private cloud deployment options address data sovereignty requirements that cloud-only platforms cannot meet. This makes it the appropriate choice for firms where legal document hosting is subject to strict infrastructure policies.</li>


<li><strong>For AmLaw 100 and Global 100 practices managing multi-office closings:</strong> The annual subscription with unlimited usage model and dedicated implementation support suit large-scale firm-wide deployments across multiple practice groups and offices.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier with full API access, and open-source SDKs (MIT license). Verdocs includes full API access on every plan, including the free tier, with no enterprise contract required to begin building.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, real estate, and accounting teams building regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific <a href="https://verdocs.com/product">embedded eSignature</a> with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>SimplyAgree is the clear choice for transactional attorneys at law firms where closing workflow automation is the primary requirement. When self-serve API evaluation, native web components, and embedded UI control matter from day one, evaluate developer-first alternatives before committing to a demo-required enterprise process.</p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Start for free</a> and integrate eSignature into your application without redirecting your users.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is SimplyAgree pricing?</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree does not publish plan tiers or prices on its website. Its website states annual subscription pricing with unlimited usage; prospective customers are directed to request a demo. No per-user rates, monthly figures, or plan names are listed publicly. To receive a proposal, contact SimplyAgree&#8217;s sales team with details on your firm&#8217;s practice areas, attorney headcount, and deployment requirements.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does SimplyAgree offer a free trial?</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree does not offer a free tier or self-serve free trial. All platform access requires a demo request and sales engagement. Teams that need to prototype integrations or validate developer experience before a procurement decision should evaluate platforms with self-serve access. <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">Verdocs</a> offers a permanent free tier with 25 envelopes per month and full API access with no credit card required.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What does SimplyAgree include?</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree publicly lists eSigning, signature packets, document compilation, closing binders, signature pages, and integrations as product areas. It supports M&amp;A, commercial real estate, banking and lending, and venture capital practice areas. Confirmed integrations include NetDocs, iManage, and DocuSign. SimplyAgree supports cloud, private cloud, and on-premises deployment options. Public API availability and packaging are not disclosed on its website.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How does SimplyAgree compare to DocuSign on price?</strong></h3>


<p>SimplyAgree does not publish pricing, so a direct numerical comparison is not possible without a quote. DocuSign&#8217;s published pricing is Personal at $10/month, Standard at $25/user/month, and Business Pro at $40/user/month, all billed annually, with Standard and Business Pro including up to 100 envelopes per user per year. The more relevant distinction is category: SimplyAgree is a closing management platform built for transactional attorneys, while DocuSign is a general-purpose eSignature platform. Teams choosing between them are typically evaluating different use cases rather than equivalent feature sets at different prices.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the best SimplyAgree alternative for developers?</strong></h3>


<p>For development teams building eSignature into their own applications, <a href="https://verdocs.com/">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for embedded use cases. Verdocs supports native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes full API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required. The platform is SOC 2 Type I certified with open-source SDKs under the MIT license. For <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">fintech</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/real-estate"> real estate</a>, and <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/accounting">accounting</a> teams building embedded document workflows, Verdocs&#8217; native web component model provides deeper framework-native control compared to iframe-based approaches.</p>


<p></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/simplyagree-pricing/">SimplyAgree Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blueink Pricing: Complete Guide to Plans and Costs in 2026</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/blueink-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Blueink pricing is structured across four tiers: Standard at $15/user/month (billed annually, 120 envelopes/user/year), Business Pro at $30/user/month (billed annually, 1,800 envelopes/user/year), Unlimited at $40/user/month (billed annually, no envelope cap), and Enterprise at per-envelope pricing with unlimited users, full API access, and HIPAA compliance. All three fixed-rate plans are billed per user per month annually; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/blueink-pricing/">Blueink Pricing: Complete Guide to Plans and Costs in 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Blueink pricing is structured across four tiers: Standard at $15/user/month (billed annually, 120 envelopes/user/year), Business Pro at $30/user/month (billed annually, 1,800 envelopes/user/year), Unlimited at $40/user/month (billed annually, no envelope cap), and Enterprise at per-envelope pricing with unlimited users, full API access, and HIPAA compliance. All three fixed-rate plans are billed per user per month annually; Enterprise uses a per-envelope model and is custom-quoted.</p>


<p>The best Blueink plan for most SMB teams is Business Pro at $30/user/month (billed annually, $360/year per user), which covers 1,800 envelopes per user per year and adds SMS delivery, reminder emails, custom messaging, and attachment fields over Standard. Unlimited at $40/user/month removes the envelope cap for high-volume teams. Enterprise is custom-quoted and is the required tier for API access, HIPAA compliance, Bulk Send, Smart Link Forms, SSO/SCIM, and a dedicated Customer Success Team. The four tiers at a glance: Standard ($15/user/month), Business Pro ($30/user/month), Unlimited ($40/user/month), and Enterprise (custom, per-envelope).</p>


<p>Four tiers cover the range: Standard for low-volume individual use, Business Pro for SMB teams with active workflows, Unlimited for high-volume or variable-cadence teams, and Enterprise for regulated industries and API-driven deployments. The plan structure raises practical questions. Which tier includes templates? Where do Teams and Signing Brands appear? What does Enterprise actually cost per envelope, and when does it beat per-seat pricing? This guide covers every Blueink pricing tier and what each plan includes. We compare Blueink cost to DocuSign, PandaDoc, SignNow, and developer-first alternatives, and map which tier fits each buyer type.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The <strong>Standard plan</strong> is $15/user/month (billed annually, $180/year) and includes 120 envelopes per user per year and basic signing features, including templates.</li>


<li>The <strong>Business Pro plan</strong> is $30/user/month (billed annually, $360/year) and raises the envelope allowance to 1,800 per user per year, adding SMS Delivery, Reminder Emails, Custom Messaging, and Attachment Fields.</li>


<li>The <strong>Unlimited plan</strong> is $40/user/month (billed annually) with no envelope cap, and includes Teams and Signing Brands.</li>


<li>The <strong>Enterprise plan</strong> uses per-envelope pricing with unlimited users and adds API access, Bulk Send, Smart Link Forms, Custom Reporting, SSO/SCIM, and a dedicated Customer Success Team. HIPAA compliance is included; organizations requiring a Business Associate Agreement should confirm BAA availability directly with Blueink.</li>


<li>Blueink offers a <strong>14-day free trial</strong> on paid plans and a separate <strong>free developer sandbox</strong> account for API evaluation before any Enterprise commitment.</li>


<li>Blueink is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, and holds a 4.8/5 rating on <a href="https://www.capterra.com/p/209622/BlueInk/">Capterra</a>.</li>


<li>For development teams building embedded signing into their own applications, Verdocs provides a self-serve free tier with full API access, <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong>, and 60+ native web components with no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research Blueink Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three buyer scenarios account for most Blueink pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>DocuSign cost comparison.</strong> Teams evaluating Blueink are often looking for a lower-cost alternative to DocuSign for standard signing workflows. Blueink Business Pro at $30/user/month compares to DocuSign Business Pro at $40/user/month, a 25% reduction based on current annual list prices. Understanding the feature and envelope differences between the two platforms is the most common reason buyers research this page.</li>


<li><strong>Envelope volume and plan fit.</strong> The Standard plan&#8217;s 120 envelopes per user per year equate to roughly 10 per month. Teams with regular document workflows need to evaluate whether Business Pro (1,800/year) or Unlimited covers their actual cadence. Confirm upgrade and additional-capacity options with Blueink if your team is approaching an envelope limit.</li>


<li><strong>Compliance and API requirements.</strong> HIPAA compliance, API access, Bulk Send, Smart Link Forms, and SSO/SCIM are all Enterprise-only features. Teams in healthcare, education, or government, or those building programmatic document workflows, need to plan for Enterprise pricing from the outset rather than treating it as a future upgrade.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>This guide answers all three before you need to contact sales.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink structures its pricing across four tiers. Standard, Business Pro, and Unlimited are self-serve with published per-user pricing; Enterprise is custom-quoted based on document volume.</p>


<p>Here is a summary of all Blueink plans and costs as of 2026:</p>


<p><strong>Standard: $15/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>120 envelopes per user per year</li>


<li>Templates included</li>


<li>Core signing features and audit trail</li>


<li>Best for: Solo professionals and small teams with low signing volume</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Business Pro: $30/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>1,800 envelopes per user per year</li>


<li>SMS Delivery, Reminder Emails, Custom Messaging, Attachment Fields</li>


<li>Best for: SMB teams with active, customer-facing signing workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Unlimited: $40/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>No envelope cap</li>


<li>Teams and Signing Brands included</li>


<li>Best for: High-volume teams or variable document cadence</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise: Custom per-envelope pricing</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited users</li>


<li>API access and Embedded Signing</li>


<li>Bulk Send, Smart Link Forms</li>


<li>Custom Reporting, SSO/SCIM</li>


<li>HIPAA compliance (confirm BAA availability with Blueink)</li>


<li>Dedicated Customer Success Team</li>


<li>Best for: Regulated industries, API-driven deployments, high-volume organizations</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Blueink plans at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Standard</strong> ($15/user/month annual): 120 envelopes/user/year, templates, audit trail, core signing</li>


<li><strong>Business Pro</strong> ($30/user/month annual): 1,800 envelopes/user/year, SMS Delivery, Reminder Emails, Custom Messaging, Attachment Fields</li>


<li><strong>Unlimited</strong> ($40/user/month annual): no envelope cap, Teams, Signing Brands, all Business Pro features</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise</strong> (custom per-envelope): unlimited users, API access, Bulk Send, Smart Link Forms, Custom Reporting, SSO/SCIM, HIPAA compliance, dedicated Customer Success Team</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The core differentiator between Business Pro and Unlimited is the envelope cap and the addition of Teams and Signing Brands. The core differentiator between Unlimited and Enterprise is API access, compliance certifications, and the shift from per-user to per-envelope pricing. Enterprise becomes more cost-effective than per-seat plans as user counts grow, since unlimited users are included under a single volume-based contract. Confirm current per-envelope rates and minimum volume commitments with Blueink Sales.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Standard Plan: Features and Envelope Limits</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s Standard plan is the entry-level tier at $15/user/month (billed annually, $180/user/year). It serves solo professionals and small teams with low document volume who need core eSignature without advanced collaboration or compliance features.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $15/user/month (billed annually, $180/user/year)</li>


<li><strong>Envelopes:</strong> 120 per user per year (approximately 10 per month)</li>


<li><strong>Templates:</strong> Included</li>


<li><strong>SMS Delivery:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Teams / Signing Brands:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Solo professionals and small teams with low, consistent signing volume</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Standard plan includes:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>120 envelopes per user per year:</strong> equates to roughly 10 documents per month; sufficient for infrequent signing workflows</li>


<li><strong>Templates:</strong> build reusable signing workflows for recurring document types</li>


<li><strong>Core field types:</strong> signature, initials, date, and text fields for standard agreement preparation</li>


<li><strong>Audit trail and Certificate of Evidence:</strong> legally valid record of all signing events, timestamps, IP addresses, and participant identities for every completed document</li>


<li><strong>Real-time document status tracking:</strong> monitor signing progress across all active documents</li>


<li><strong>Mobile app access:</strong> iOS and Android signing support for signers and senders</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The 120-Envelope Cap in Practice</strong></h3>


<p>For a team of five sending service agreements, onboarding forms, or vendor contracts, the Standard plan&#8217;s 120 envelopes per user per year means each person can send roughly one document every two to three working days before hitting their annual limit. Teams with any consistent signing cadence above that threshold will approach the cap well before year-end. Confirm upgrade and additional-capacity options with Blueink before committing to Standard for a team with regular document volume.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Solo professionals and very small teams with infrequent signing needs where document volume stays below 10 per user per month. Suitable for freelance contracts, occasional vendor agreements, and <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">NDA workflows</a> where the primary requirement is a legally valid audit trail at a low per-seat cost.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business Pro Plan: SMS, Reminders, and Higher Volume</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s Business Pro plan is the practical starting point for most SMB teams at $30/user/month (billed annually, $360/user/year). It raises the envelope allowance substantially and adds the features that support customer-facing and mobile-first signing workflows.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $30/user/month (billed annually, $360/user/year)</li>


<li><strong>Envelopes:</strong> 1,800 per user per year (approximately 150 per month)</li>


<li><strong>SMS Delivery:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Teams / Signing Brands:</strong> No (included with Unlimited)</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> SMB teams with regular signing volume and customer-facing or mobile workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What Business Pro adds over Standard:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>1,800 envelopes per user per year:</strong> raises the monthly cadence to approximately 150 documents per user, covering daily document operations for most SMB teams</li>


<li><strong>SMS Delivery:</strong> sends signing invitations to recipients via text message; Blueink reports a 94% open rate within nine minutes for SMS-delivered documents</li>


<li><strong>Reminder Emails:</strong> automated follow-ups sent to signers who have not completed documents, reducing manual coordination overhead</li>


<li><strong>Custom Messaging:</strong> tailor the text of signing invitations and notifications per document type or recipient</li>


<li><strong>Attachment Fields:</strong> allow signers to attach supporting documents as part of the signing workflow</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SMS Delivery in Practice</strong></h3>


<p>SMS delivery is particularly effective for industries where recipients are not consistently at a desk. Healthcare intake, real estate coordination, field services, and education enrollment all benefit from higher mobile open rates compared to email-only delivery. For <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions">healthcare</a> and<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/real-estate"> real estate</a> teams, the combination of higher envelope volume and SMS delivery makes Business Pro the practical minimum tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>SMB teams that send more than 10 documents per user per month and need SMS delivery, automated reminders, and custom messaging for customer-facing signing workflows. Teams in <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">financial services</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>, and<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a>, where daily document operations require a higher envelope ceiling than Standard provides.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Unlimited Plan: No Envelope Cap, Teams, and Signing Brands</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s Unlimited plan removes the envelope cap entirely and adds Teams and Signing Brands at $40/user/month (billed annually).</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $40/user/month (billed annually)</li>


<li><strong>Envelopes:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Teams:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Signing Brands:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> High-volume teams or organizations with variable, seasonal document cadence</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What Unlimited adds over Business Pro:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>No envelope cap:</strong> remove the planning overhead of tracking monthly usage; suitable for teams with unpredictable or seasonally variable document volume</li>


<li><strong>Teams:</strong> organized user management, shared templates, and workflow tracking by team or department</li>


<li><strong>Signing Brands:</strong> customize the signing experience with organization logos and tailored messaging per document type, delivering a consistent branded experience to signers</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Unlimited vs Business Pro</strong></h3>


<p>The $10/user/month difference between Business Pro and Unlimited covers three additions: no envelope cap, Teams, and Signing Brands. For HR departments managing large onboarding cohorts, legal teams processing contracts daily, or businesses with document volume that spikes seasonally, the removal of the cap eliminates mid-year operational disruption. Like Business Pro, Unlimited is not designed for API-based or programmatic document workflows. Teams that need to embed signing into their own application or connect signing to custom systems should evaluate Enterprise.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>High-volume HR operations, legal teams, and organizations with variable or seasonal document cadence where envelope cap management creates operational friction. Teams that need Signing Brands for consistent customer-facing identity across signing workflows without an Enterprise contract.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan: API, Compliance, and Volume Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s Enterprise plan serves organizations building API-connected or compliance-mandated document workflows, using per-envelope pricing rather than per-user billing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> Custom per-envelope pricing; confirm current rates with Blueink Sales</li>


<li><strong>Envelopes:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Unlimited (no per-seat cost)</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> Yes (REST API, Embedded Signing)</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Smart Link Forms:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>HIPAA Compliance:</strong> Yes (confirm BAA availability directly with Blueink)</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Regulated industries, API-driven deployments, high-volume organizations</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise-specific additions:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>REST API and Embedded Signing access:</strong> programmatic document creation, signer routing, webhook-based event handling, and the ability to render the signing experience inside your own application</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> distribute one document to a large number of signers simultaneously, each in an independent signing session</li>


<li><strong>Smart Link Forms:</strong> convert a template into a self-serve web form that signers can complete on demand without a direct sending action</li>


<li><strong>Custom Reporting:</strong> organization-level document tracking, completion rate dashboards, and audit-ready export formats</li>


<li><strong>SSO / SCIM:</strong> SAML-based single sign-on and automated user provisioning via SCIM for centralized enterprise access management</li>


<li><strong>HIPAA compliance:</strong> listed as an Enterprise feature; organizations that require a <a href="https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/covered-entities/sample-business-associate-agreement-provisions/index.html">Business Associate Agreement</a> should confirm BAA availability directly with Blueink</li>


<li><strong>Dedicated Customer Success Team:</strong> named support contact, onboarding assistance, and implementation guidance</li>


<li><strong>Free developer sandbox:</strong> a separate free account for API evaluation before committing to an Enterprise contract</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Enterprise pricing is per-envelope rather than per-seat. For organizations with large user counts, this model removes the per-user cost that compounds on fixed-rate plans. Confirm current per-envelope rates and minimum volume commitments with Blueink Sales.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Healthcare practices, educational institutions, and government contractors in regulated industries where HIPAA or FERPA compliance is required. <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">Financial services</a> and <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance">insurance</a> teams that need programmatic API access for document workflow automation. Large organizations where per-envelope pricing is more cost-effective than per-seat billing at scale.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink Free Trial and Developer Sandbox</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink offers a 14-day free trial on all paid plans and a separate free developer sandbox account for API evaluation. Blueink does not offer a permanent free eSignature plan.</p>


<p><strong>14-day free trial specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Duration:</strong> 14 days from registration</li>


<li><strong>Access:</strong> Full plan feature set during the trial period</li>


<li><strong>Credit card:</strong> Not required</li>


<li><strong>Conversion:</strong> At the end of 14 days, the account transitions to a paid plan or deactivates</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Developer sandbox specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Duration:</strong> Ongoing free access for API evaluation</li>


<li><strong>Access:</strong> API sandbox environment for proof-of-concept and integration scoping</li>


<li><strong>Credit card:</strong> Not required</li>


<li><strong>Use case:</strong> Test programmatic document creation, webhook handling, and Embedded Signing before committing to an Enterprise contract</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The developer sandbox is particularly useful for teams evaluating the Embedded Signing capability, which allows the signing experience to render inside an application rather than redirecting signers to a Blueink-hosted page. Teams should use the sandbox to validate integration architecture and design system fit before entering Enterprise procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink&#8217;s Envelope and Pricing Model</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink uses a per-user, per-month model for Standard, Business Pro, and Unlimited, and a per-envelope model for Enterprise. This structure has meaningful cost implications depending on team size and document volume.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Envelope Counting Works</strong></h3>


<p>In Blueink&#8217;s pricing model, an envelope is a document package sent to one or more signers in a single transaction. A three-page contract sent to two co-signers counts as one envelope, not two or six. Teams typically send fewer envelopes than initially projected once they understand that multi-page, multi-signer documents consume a single envelope.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Per-User vs Per-Envelope Cost Trade-Off</strong></h3>


<p>The fixed-rate plans scale linearly with user count. A 10-user team on Business Pro pays $3,600/year ($30 x 10 x 12); a 25-user team pays $9,000/year. Enterprise&#8217;s per-envelope model includes unlimited users, which changes the cost structure for larger organizations. For high-volume organizations with large teams, confirm whether per-envelope Enterprise pricing delivers a lower total annual cost than the per-seat Unlimited plan.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink vs DocuSign Cost Comparison</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink Business Pro at $30/user/month is 25% less than DocuSign Business Pro at $40/user/month based on current annual list prices. A 10-user team on Blueink Business Pro pays $3,600/year; the same team on DocuSign Business Pro pays $4,800/year, a $1,200 annual difference. DocuSign Standard and Business Pro annual plans include 100 envelopes per user per year. Blueink Business Pro includes 1,800 envelopes per user per year, a substantially higher allocation at the lower price point.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink API and Embedded Signing</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s REST API is available on the Enterprise plan, along with a free developer sandbox for scoping and proof-of-concept work before committing to a contract.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Blueink&#8217;s API Supports</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Programmatic document creation and template population via REST endpoints</li>


<li>Signer routing and field configuration via API calls</li>


<li>Webhook-based status notifications (document opened, signed, completed, declined)</li>


<li>Embedded Signing: render the signing experience inside your own application rather than redirecting signers to a Blueink-hosted page</li>


<li>In-person signing workflows initiated via SMS</li>


<li>Real-time audit trail retrieval and download of completed documents</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s Embedded Signing capability allows the signing interface to render inside a host application rather than opening in Blueink&#8217;s hosted environment. Teams building applications where signers complete documents natively inside the product UI should use the developer sandbox to validate how deeply the Embedded Signing experience integrates with their application&#8217;s design system and CSS requirements before committing to Enterprise pricing.</p>


<p>Development teams should also evaluate whether Blueink&#8217;s Enterprise API model, which requires a custom-quoted contract before full access, fits their evaluation timeline. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> with native web components provide faster time-to-prototype for teams that need to build before entering procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink Pricing vs Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink vs DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink Business Pro at $30/user/month is 25% less than DocuSign Business Pro at $40/user/month based on current annual list prices. DocuSign Standard is $25/user/month and DocuSign Personal is $10/month; Standard and Business Pro annual plans include 100 envelopes per user per year, with excess potentially billed pay-as-you-go. DocuSign includes 400+ pre-built integrations with CRM, HRIS, and ERP platforms and a broad enterprise feature catalog. Blueink provides a higher envelope allowance at Business Pro (1,800 vs 100 per user per year) and includes HIPAA compliance and API access at Enterprise for teams in regulated mid-market industries.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink vs PandaDoc</strong></h3>


<p>PandaDoc combines eSignature with proposal management, CPQ, and CRM-native document workflows. Pricing starts at $19/user/month on Essentials and $49/user/month on Business. PandaDoc is well-suited for revenue teams that need proposals, quotes, and contracts managed alongside native HubSpot and Salesforce sync. Blueink serves organizations focused primarily on eSignature with compliance depth rather than the full sales document lifecycle.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink vs SignNow</strong></h3>


<p>SignNow offers standard business plans and separate API and site-license options; confirm API access and pricing directly on SignNow&#8217;s plan pages. Entry pricing starts at $8/user/month for standard signing workflows. Blueink adds compliance depth (HIPAA, FERPA) for regulated industries and a higher envelope allowance at Business Pro compared to SignNow&#8217;s equivalent tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is the most developer-focused <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embeddable eSignature platform</a> for teams building signing directly into their own applications. Verdocs is built on an API-first design with 60+ native web components (React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, TypeScript) and full CSS control for white-label in-app signing. Verdocs supports both native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. Open-source SDKs (MIT license), SOC 2 Type I certification, 2048-bit RSA encryption, HSM key storage, and PKI digital certificates address the security and compliance requirements development teams verify before integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes full API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Pricing on Blueink</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s REST API and Embedded Signing capability are available on the Enterprise plan. A free developer sandbox provides API access for evaluation before any Enterprise commitment. Teams evaluating the API should use the sandbox to scope integration requirements, test Embedded Signing behavior, and validate webhook handling before entering the Enterprise contract process.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Blueink&#8217;s Embedded Signing API Supports</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>REST endpoints for programmatic document creation, sending, and status management</li>


<li>Embedded Signing: signing experience renders inside a host application without redirecting signers to Blueink&#8217;s hosted environment</li>


<li>Webhook callbacks for real-time event notifications (document opened, signed, completed, declined)</li>


<li>Template instantiation via API calls</li>


<li>Signer authentication configuration per document</li>


<li>Developer SDKs in Python, JavaScript, and PHP</li>


<li>Dedicated API success team for integration support</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s Embedded Signing allows the signing interface to render inside your application. Teams with design system requirements, full CSS control needs, or framework-native component preferences should evaluate how deeply the Embedded Signing experience can be customized relative to their product&#8217;s UI before finalizing an Enterprise contract. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> allow teams to prototype embedded workflows without entering a procurement process first.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Blueink Compliance: HIPAA, FERPA, and Audit Trails</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s strongest differentiation for its target market is compliance depth for regulated industries at a price point designed for SMBs rather than enterprise procurement cycles.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Compliance Features by Plan</strong></h3>


<p><strong>Standard, Business Pro, and Unlimited:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Audit trail and Certificate of Evidence for every completed document</li>


<li><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/electronic-signatures-global-national-commerce-act">E-SIGN Act</a> and UETA compliant electronic signatures</li>


<li>Real-time document status tracking and standard access controls</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>HIPAA compliance listed as an Enterprise feature; organizations requiring a Business Associate Agreement should confirm BAA availability directly with Blueink</li>


<li>FERPA compliance for educational institutions handling student records</li>


<li>Custom Reporting and audit-ready export formats for regulatory review</li>


<li>SSO / SCIM for centralized access control and user lifecycle management</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Compliance Depth Means for Total Cost</strong></h3>


<p>Organizations in healthcare, education, and government that require HIPAA or FERPA compliance must plan for Enterprise pricing as their baseline tier, not a future upgrade. The per-envelope Enterprise model includes unlimited users, which changes the total cost equation for organizations with large teams relative to the per-seat plans. Confirm current Enterprise per-envelope rates and minimum contract terms with Blueink Sales when modeling total cost of ownership for regulated workflows.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s pricing model is well-matched for a specific buyer. Here is how to decide without a sales call.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing Blueink:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For solo professionals and small teams with low document volume:</strong> Standard at $15/user/month ($180/year) delivers core eSignature with templates and a legally valid audit trail at a low per-seat cost.</li>


<li><strong>For SMB teams with active signing workflows:</strong> Business Pro at $30/user/month ($360/year) is the practical starting point. The 1,800 envelopes per user per year, SMS delivery, and automated reminders cover daily document operations for most teams.</li>


<li><strong>For high-volume or variable-cadence teams:</strong> Unlimited at $40/user/month removes the envelope cap and adds Teams and Signing Brands, eliminating plan-management overhead without requiring an Enterprise contract.</li>


<li><strong>For regulated industries requiring HIPAA compliance and API access:</strong> Enterprise is the required tier. Per-envelope pricing with unlimited users becomes more cost-effective than per-seat plans as team size grows. Confirm current rates and BAA availability with Blueink Sales.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier with full API access, and open-source SDKs (MIT license). Verdocs includes full API access on every plan including the free tier, with no enterprise contract required to begin building.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, real estate, and accounting teams building regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific <a href="https://verdocs.com/product">embedded eSignature</a> with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s per-user pricing is genuinely favorable for SMBs in regulated industries that need HIPAA or FERPA compliance at a lower cost than DocuSign&#8217;s equivalent tiers. When self-serve API evaluation, native web components, and embedded UI control matter from day one, evaluate developer-first alternatives before committing to an Enterprise contract process.</p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Start for free</a> and deliver a native signing experience that your users never have to leave your product for.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does Blueink cost per month?</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink pricing starts at $15/user/month for Standard (billed annually, $180/user/year), $30/user/month for Business Pro (billed annually, $360/user/year), and $40/user/month for Unlimited (billed annually). Enterprise pricing uses a per-envelope model with unlimited users; confirm current per-envelope rates and minimum volume commitments with Blueink Sales. A 14-day free trial is available on all paid plans with no credit card required.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Blueink include HIPAA compliance?</strong></h3>


<p>HIPAA compliance is listed as an Enterprise feature. Organizations in healthcare handling Protected Health Information should confirm plan eligibility, BAA requirements, and PHI workflow terms directly with Blueink. FERPA compliance for educational institutions is also included at the Enterprise tier. Standard, Business Pro, and Unlimited are designed for general business signing; confirm compliance certification requirements with Blueink before selecting a plan for regulated workflows.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Blueink have an API?</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink&#8217;s REST API and Embedded Signing capability are available on the Enterprise plan. A free developer sandbox provides API access for scoping and proof-of-concept work before committing to an Enterprise contract. Embedded Signing allows the signing experience to render inside a host application rather than redirecting signers to a Blueink-hosted page. Standard, Business Pro, and Unlimited use Blueink&#8217;s hosted signing interface without programmatic API integration.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is Blueink cheaper than DocuSign?</strong></h3>


<p>Blueink Business Pro at $30/user/month is 25% less than DocuSign Business Pro at $40/user/month based on current annual list prices. DocuSign Standard is $25/user/month. A 10-user team on Blueink Business Pro pays $3,600/year; the same team on DocuSign Business Pro pays $4,800/year. Blueink Business Pro also includes 1,800 envelopes per user per year compared to DocuSign Standard and Business Pro annual plans, which include 100 envelopes per user per year.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the best Blueink alternative for developers?</strong></h3>


<p>For development teams building eSignature into their own applications, <a href="https://verdocs.com/">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for embedded use cases. Verdocs supports native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes full API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required. The platform is SOC 2 Type I certified with open-source SDKs under MIT license. For <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">fintech</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/real-estate"> real estate</a>, and <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/accounting">accounting</a> teams building embedded document workflows, Verdocs&#8217; native web component model provides deeper framework-native control compared to iframe-based approaches.</p>


<p></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/blueink-pricing/">Blueink Pricing: Complete Guide to Plans and Costs in 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrive Pricing: Plans, Costs &#038; Complete Guide (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/scrive-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Scrive eSign Online pricing is structured across four tiers: a 14-day Trial at no cost, Essential at €21/user/month (billed annually), Business at €49/user/month (billed annually), and Enterprise at custom quote-based pricing. The Trial includes 10 documents with no credit card required. The Essential plan lists unlimited documents and covers standard signing workflows; Business adds eID/BankID [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/scrive-pricing/">Scrive Pricing: Plans, Costs &#038; Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Scrive eSign Online pricing is structured across four tiers: a 14-day Trial at no cost, Essential at €21/user/month (billed annually), Business at €49/user/month (billed annually), and Enterprise at custom quote-based pricing. The Trial includes 10 documents with no credit card required. The Essential plan lists unlimited documents and covers standard signing workflows; Business adds eID/BankID as an add-on, custom branding, and expanded integrations; Enterprise adds custom workflows, SSO, dedicated service, and scalable configurations.</p>


<p>The best Scrive plan for most teams is Essential at €21/user/month (billed annually), which covers unlimited documents and standard signing workflows for individuals and small teams. Business at €49/user/month adds eID/BankID access as an add-on, custom branding, templates, and integrations for teams with regulated agreement workflows. Enterprise is quote-based and designed for organizations requiring custom workflows, dedicated service, SSO, and SLA options. The four tiers at a glance: Trial (free, 10 documents), Essential (€21/user/month), Business (€49/user/month), and Enterprise (custom quote).</p>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s pricing structure raises practical questions. Which plan includes eID and BankID access? How is the eSign API priced, and is it part of the standard plans? What add-on costs apply to SMS authentication and identity verification? This guide covers every Scrive pricing tier and what each plan includes. We compare Scrive cost to DocuSign, Adobe Sign, and developer-first alternatives, and map which tier fits each buyer type.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Scrive eSign Online currently offers four tiers: Trial (free, 10 documents), Essential at <strong>€21/user/month</strong>, Business at <strong>€49/user/month</strong>, and Enterprise at a custom quote, all paid plans are billed annually.</li>


<li>The <strong>14-day free trial</strong> includes 10 documents with no credit card or obligation; Scrive does not list a permanent free eSign Online plan.</li>


<li><strong>eID/BankID</strong> access is not available as an add-on on Essential; it is available as an add-on on Business and Enterprise, with additional fees.</li>


<li>Scrive&#8217;s <strong>eSign API</strong> is a separate quote-based product from eSign Online; Scrive offers a <strong>30-day free API Testbed</strong> account for evaluation.</li>


<li>SMS authentications are available as an add-on with additional fees; Scrive does not publish a per-SMS rate on its current pricing page.</li>


<li>Scrive supports multiple Nordic and European eID methods, including BankID Sweden, BankID Norway, MitID, and Freja eID / OrgID, and is an EU-recognized Qualified Trust Service Provider certified to offer Qualified Electronic Signatures.</li>


<li>For development teams building embedded signing into their own applications, Verdocs provides a self-serve free tier with full API access, <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong>, and 60+ native web components, no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research Scrive Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three buyer scenarios account for most Scrive pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Plan selection and eID access.</strong> Teams evaluating Scrive want to confirm which plan unlocks BankID and MitID authentication. eID/BankID is not available as an add-on on Essential; it requires Business or Enterprise, which means the effective minimum cost for eID-verified workflows is €49/user/month.</li>


<li><strong>API access and the eSign API product.</strong> Scrive&#8217;s eSign API is a separate quote-based product, not a feature tier within eSign Online. Development teams evaluating programmatic or embedded signing need to request a quote for the eSign API, or use the 30-day free API Testbed to evaluate before entering procurement.</li>


<li><strong>Add-on cost modeling.</strong> SMS authentications, eID/BankID access, and Forms Builder each carry additional fees not included in the base subscription. Teams building total cost of ownership models need to account for these before committing to a plan.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>This guide answers all three before you need to contact sales.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive eSign Online structures its pricing across four tiers. The Trial and Essential plans are self-serve with published terms; Business lists published pricing; Enterprise is quote-based.</p>


<p>Here is a summary of all Scrive plans and costs as of 2026:</p>


<p><strong>Trial: Free (14 days)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>10 documents included</li>


<li>No credit card required</li>


<li>No obligation</li>


<li>Best for: Evaluating core signing features before purchase</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Essential: €21/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited documents</li>


<li>Standard signing workflows</li>


<li>Email-based authentication</li>


<li>Best for: Individuals and small teams with standard signing needs</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Business: €49/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited documents</li>


<li>eID/BankID available as an add-on (additional fees apply)</li>


<li>Custom branding</li>


<li>Templates and contact book</li>


<li>Plugins and integrations</li>


<li>Request attachment</li>


<li>Best for: Teams with regulated workflows, eID requirements, or integration needs</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise: Custom quote</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Custom workflows and configurations</li>


<li>Dedicated service and implementation support</li>


<li>SSO / SAML</li>


<li>SLA options</li>


<li>Bulk send</li>


<li>Scalable configurations</li>


<li>Best for: Large organizations, regulated industries, custom deployment requirements</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Scrive plans at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Trial</strong> (free, 14 days): 10 documents, no credit card, no obligation</li>


<li><strong>Essential</strong> (€21/user/month annual): unlimited documents, standard signing, email authentication</li>


<li><strong>Business</strong> (€49/user/month annual): unlimited documents, eID/BankID add-on available, custom branding, templates, integrations, contact book</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise</strong> (custom quote): custom workflows, dedicated service, SSO, SLA, bulk send, scalable configurations</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The core differentiator between Essential and Business is eID/BankID access. BankID and eID authentication are not available on Essential; they require Business or Enterprise with an additional add-on fee. For organizations where BankID or MitID is a compliance requirement, Business is the effective entry point. Confirm document volume limits, fair-use terms, and any add-on rates directly with Scrive before purchasing.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Essential Plan: Features and Signing Workflows</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s Essential plan is the entry-level paid tier at €21/user/month (billed annually). It serves individuals and small teams with standard signing volume who need legally valid eSignatures without eID authentication requirements.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> €21/user/month (billed annually)</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> Unlimited (confirm fair-use terms with Scrive)</li>


<li><strong>eID/BankID:</strong> Not available as an add-on</li>


<li><strong>Custom Branding:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Individuals and small teams with standard, non-eID signing needs</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Essential plan includes:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Unlimited documents:</strong> standard signing volume with no published per-document cap; confirm fair-use terms directly with Scrive</li>


<li><strong>Email-based authentication:</strong> signer identity confirmed via email; standard for general commercial agreements</li>


<li><strong>Audit trail:</strong> legally valid record of all signing events, participant identities, timestamps, and IP addresses</li>


<li><strong>Document preparation:</strong> upload, field placement, and sending workflow for standard agreement types</li>


<li><strong>eIDAS-compliant signatures:</strong> documents signed with Scrive conform to<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0910"> eIDAS</a>; the legal signature level depends on the method and configuration used</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eID Access on Essential</strong></h3>


<p>eID/BankID is not available as an add-on on the Essential plan. Organizations that need BankID Sweden, BankID Norway, MitID, or other Nordic eID methods for signer authentication must upgrade to Business or Enterprise, where eID/BankID is available as an add-on with additional fees. Teams evaluating Scrive specifically for eID-verified workflows should plan for Business pricing at minimum.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Individuals and small teams outside the Nordic market, or organizations with standard commercial signing needs that do not require eID authentication. Suitable for <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">NDA workflows</a>, vendor agreements, and internal approval documents where email-based electronic signatures meet the applicable legal standard.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business Plan: eID, Branding, and Integrations</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s Business plan is the tier that unlocks eID/BankID authentication as an add-on, custom branding, templates, and integrations at €49/user/month (billed annually).</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> €49/user/month (billed annually)</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> Unlimited (confirm fair-use terms with Scrive)</li>


<li><strong>eID/BankID:</strong> Available as an add-on (additional fees apply)</li>


<li><strong>Custom Branding:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> No (Enterprise only)</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Teams with eID requirements, regulated agreement workflows, or integration needs</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Business plan adds over Essential:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>eID/BankID as add-on:</strong> access to BankID Sweden, BankID Norway, MitID, Freja eID / OrgID, and other supported eID methods, subject to additional fees per authentication</li>


<li><strong>Custom branding:</strong> add organization logos and brand colors to signing interfaces and document communications</li>


<li><strong>Templates:</strong> create, store, and reuse document templates for recurring agreement types</li>


<li><strong>Contact book:</strong> manage signer contacts within the platform for recurring workflow efficiency</li>


<li><strong>Plugins and integrations:</strong> expanded connector library, including CRM and cloud storage platforms</li>


<li><strong>Request attachment:</strong> allow signers to attach supporting documents as part of the signing workflow</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eID/BankID Add-On on Business</strong></h3>


<p>BankID Sweden alone reported <a href="https://www.bankid.com/en/om-oss/statistik">8.6 million</a> active users in 2024 and was used 7.6 billion times that year. For organizations operating in Swedish financial services, real estate, or regulated procurement, BankID authentication is a compliance requirement. On the Business plan, eID/BankID access is enabled as an add-on with additional per-authentication fees. Teams should confirm current add-on rates directly with Scrive when modeling the total cost of ownership.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Organizations in Nordic and European markets where BankID, MitID, or other eID authentication is a compliance requirement for regulated agreement workflows. <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">Financial services</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>, and<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a> teams in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark are managing high-value agreements where identity-verified signing is required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan: Custom Pricing and Configurations</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s Enterprise plan serves organizations requiring custom workflows, dedicated service, scalable configurations, and the full compliance and governance stack.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> Custom quote (contact Scrive Sales)</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> Custom volume configurations</li>


<li><strong>eID/BankID:</strong> Available as an add-on (additional fees apply)</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>SSO / SAML:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>SLA Options:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Large organizations, regulated industries, custom deployment requirements</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise-specific additions:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Bulk send:</strong> distribute one document template to multiple signers simultaneously, each in an independent signing session</li>


<li><strong>SSO / SAML:</strong> centralized enterprise access management via single sign-on and SCIM-based user provisioning</li>


<li><strong>SLA options:</strong> response time guarantees and uptime commitments negotiated per contract</li>


<li><strong>Custom workflows:</strong> tailored signing sequences, conditional routing, and agreement automation for complex multi-party processes</li>


<li><strong>Dedicated service:</strong> named account management, onboarding support, and implementation assistance</li>


<li><strong>Scalable configurations:</strong> volume-based pricing and infrastructure options suited to large organizational deployments</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Enterprise buyers typically include <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">large financial institutions</a>, insurance carriers, and public sector organizations in Nordic and European markets where Scrive&#8217;s certified eID stack and QTSP status provide compliance coverage for regulated agreement workflows.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Large organizations with complex workflow requirements, custom volume commitments, and regulated compliance obligations across Nordic and European markets. Public sector procurement, financial services onboarding, and insurance policy workflows where bulk send, dedicated service, and SSO are primary selection criteria.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive Free Trial and API Testbed</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive offers a 14-day free trial for eSign Online and a 30-day free API Testbed for eSign API evaluation. Scrive does not list a permanent free eSign Online plan.</p>


<p><strong>eSign Online free trial specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Duration:</strong> 14 days from registration</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> 10 documents included</li>


<li><strong>Credit card:</strong> Not required</li>


<li><strong>Obligation:</strong> None</li>


<li><strong>Conversion:</strong> At the end of 14 days, the account requires a paid plan to continue</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>eSign API Testbed specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Duration:</strong> 30 days from registration</li>


<li><strong>Access:</strong> Full API evaluation environment</li>


<li><strong>Credit card:</strong> Not required</li>


<li><strong>Use case:</strong> Evaluate programmatic and embedded signing workflows before procurement</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The 10-document limit during the eSign Online trial is sufficient to validate the signing experience and basic workflow configuration. Teams with complex multi-party workflows or integration requirements may find the API Testbed a more useful evaluation path before entering procurement for the eSign API product.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive&#8217;s Per-User Pricing Model</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive eSign Online uses a per-user, per-month subscription model billed annually for paid self-serve plans. This structure has meaningful cost implications depending on team size and workflow type.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Per-User Pricing Works</strong></h3>


<p>Each seat on the account pays the plan&#8217;s per-user monthly rate. Essential is €21/user/month and Business is €49/user/month, both billed annually. Adding users increases the total subscription cost proportionally. There is no published per-document charge for eSign Online web-app signing within the plan&#8217;s terms; confirm fair-use limits directly with Scrive.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Add-On Costs</strong></h3>


<p>Several common use cases introduce additional per-use costs beyond the base subscription:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>eID/BankID authentications:</strong> available on Business and Enterprise as an add-on with additional fees; not available on Essential</li>


<li><strong>SMS authentications:</strong> available as an add-on with additional fees; Scrive does not publish a per-SMS rate on its current pricing page</li>


<li><strong>Forms Builder / Shareable links:</strong> available as add-ons with additional fees on applicable plans</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Teams modeling total cost of ownership should contact Scrive directly for current add-on rates, as these are not published on the standard pricing page.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSign API vs. eSign Online</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s eSign API is a separate product from eSign Online, with its own quote-based pricing. Organizations that need programmatic document creation, webhook-based event handling, or embedded signing workflows should evaluate the eSign API product independently. A 30-day free API Testbed is available. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> provide faster time-to-evaluation for teams that need to prototype before entering procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive Add-Ons and Additional Costs</strong></h2>


<p>Beyond the base subscription, several use cases introduce additional costs. Buyers should account for these when modeling total cost.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eID/BankID Authentication</strong></h3>


<p>eID/BankID access is not available as an add-on on Essential. On Business and Enterprise, eID/BankID is an add-on with additional fees per authentication. The applicable eID methods include BankID Sweden, BankID Norway, MitID, Freja eID / OrgID, Smart-ID, iDIN, Swisscom, itsme, Verimi, and Scrive QES. Confirm current add-on rates directly with Scrive.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>SMS Authentication</strong></h3>


<p>SMS-based OTP authentications are available as an add-on on applicable plans, with additional fees. Scrive does not publish a per-SMS rate on its current eSign Online pricing page. For workflows involving mobile-first signers or multi-factor SMS authentication, teams should request current rates from Scrive Sales before modeling expected monthly costs.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Forms Builder and Shareable Links</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive lists Forms Builder / Shareable links as an add-on with additional fees on applicable plans. Organizations using self-initiated signing workflows or web form-based agreement collection should confirm current add-on pricing with Scrive.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Implementation and Integration</strong></h3>


<p>Enterprise contracts typically include dedicated onboarding and implementation support. Custom integration development for proprietary systems may involve additional service fees depending on the scope. Confirm implementation terms with Scrive Sales during the Enterprise quote process.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive Pricing vs Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive vs DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive and DocuSign are both per-user subscription platforms, with Scrive&#8217;s Essential at €21/user/month and Business at €49/user/month. DocuSign Standard and Business Pro annual plans include up to 100 envelopes per user per year; monthly plans include up to 10 envelopes per user per month, with excess potentially billed pay-as-you-go. DocuSign includes 400+ pre-built integrations with CRM, HRIS, and ERP platforms. Scrive&#8217;s differentiation is its Nordic eID stack: BankID Sweden, BankID Norway, MitID, and Freja eID / OrgID are natively certified, covering compliance requirements in Swedish and Danish regulated markets that general-purpose platforms address through third-party integrations.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive vs Adobe Sign</strong></h3>


<p>Adobe Acrobat for teams provides eSignature alongside PDF editing and document management. Current pricing is Acrobat Standard for teams at $16.99/month per license and Acrobat Pro for teams at $23.99/month per license (annual, billed monthly). Adobe Acrobat for Teams is well-suited for organizations already in the Adobe ecosystem. Scrive&#8217;s differentiation is its certified eID integration and QTSP status for Qualified Electronic Signatures under eIDAS.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is the most developer-focused <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embeddable eSignature platform</a> for teams building signing directly into their own applications. Verdocs is built on an API-first design with 60+ native web components (React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, TypeScript) and full CSS control for white-label in-app signing. Verdocs supports both native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. Open-source SDKs (<a href="https://tlo.mit.edu/understand-ip/exploring-mit-open-source-license-comprehensive-guide">MIT license</a>), SOC 2 Type I certification, 2048-bit RSA encryption, HSM key storage, and PKI digital certificates address the security and compliance requirements that development teams verify before integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes full API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Pricing on Scrive</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s eSign API is a separate product from eSign Online, with quote-based pricing available on request from Scrive&#8217;s sales team. Scrive offers a 30-day free API Testbed account for teams evaluating programmatic or embedded signing workflows before procurement.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Scrive&#8217;s eSign API Supports</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Programmatic document creation and sending via REST endpoints</li>


<li>Webhook callbacks for real-time event notifications (document opened, signed, completed, declined)</li>


<li>Template instantiation via API calls</li>


<li>Signer authentication selection (email, SMS OTP, eID) per document</li>


<li>Download of completed documents and evidence packages</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s eSign API enables programmatic control and custom-branded signing workflows. Teams building applications where end users sign documents natively inside a product UI, without navigating to an external signing portal, should evaluate the depth of front-end customization available through Scrive&#8217;s API against their design system requirements. Development teams should factor the quote-required pricing process into their evaluation timeline. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> provide faster time-to-evaluation for teams that need to prototype before entering procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Scrive Nordic eID and Compliance</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s strongest differentiation is its certified eID coverage for Nordic and European markets, where BankID, MitID, and Freja eID are compliance requirements for regulated digital workflows.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eID Methods Supported</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive supports multiple Nordic and European eID methods. Coverage includes:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>BankID Sweden:</strong> reported 8.6 million active users in 2024 and <a href="https://www.bankid.com/en/om-oss/statistik">7.6 billion uses in 2024</a></li>


<li><strong>BankID Norway:</strong> Norwegian national digital identity</li>


<li><strong>MitID:</strong> Danish national digital identity; Scrive is a certified MitID broker</li>


<li><strong>Freja eID / OrgID:</strong> Swedish private-sector digital identity</li>


<li><strong>Smart-ID, iDIN, Swisscom, itsme, Verimi:</strong> additional European eID methods</li>


<li><strong>Scrive QES:</strong> Scrive&#8217;s own Qualified Electronic Signature offering</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Compliance and Certifications</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive states that documents signed with Scrive conform to <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0910">eIDAS</a>, and Scrive is an EU-recognized Qualified Trust Service Provider certified to offer Qualified Electronic Signatures. The legal signature level depends on the method and configuration used. Scrive is also ISO 27001:2022 certified and is trusted by more than 13,000 companies across 60+ countries.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What eID Compliance Means for Total Cost</strong></h3>


<p>Organizations in Nordic markets that need eID-authenticated signing must plan for Business or Enterprise pricing, where eID/BankID is available as an add-on with additional per-authentication fees. The add-on cost per eID use is not published on Scrive&#8217;s standard pricing page. Teams should request current add-on rates from Scrive Sales when building a total cost of ownership model that includes eID-authenticated volume.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s pricing model is well-matched for a specific buyer. Here is how to decide without a sales call.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing Scrive:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For Nordic organizations with eID signing requirements:</strong> The Business plan at €49/user/month is the effective entry point for BankID or MitID-authenticated workflows. The eID/BankID add-on, available with additional fees on Business and Enterprise, covers compliance requirements in Swedish and Danish regulated markets that are not met by email-based signatures alone.</li>


<li><strong>For standard European signing without eID requirements:</strong> The Essential plan at €21/user/month delivers legally valid eIDAS-compliant signatures for general commercial agreements at a competitive per-seat cost.</li>


<li><strong>For large enterprises with custom workflow and SSO requirements:</strong> Enterprise provides bulk send, SSO/SAML, SLA options, dedicated service, and scalable configurations suited to organizational-scale deployments.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier, and open-source SDKs (MIT license). Scrive&#8217;s eSign API is a separate quote-based product; Verdocs includes full API access on every plan, including the free tier.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, real estate, and accounting teams building regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific <a href="https://verdocs.com/product">embedded eSignature</a> with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s certified eID stack and QTSP status are genuinely favorable for Nordic-market compliance workflows where BankID and MitID are table-stakes requirements. When self-serve API evaluation, native web components, and embedded UI control matter, evaluate developer-first alternatives before committing to a quote-based procurement process.</p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup"><strong>Start for free</strong></a> and build white-labeled document signing natively into your product.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What does Scrive pricing start at?</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive eSign Online currently offers Essential at €21/user/month and Business at €49/user/month, both billed annually. A 14-day free trial is available with 10 documents and no credit card required. Enterprise pricing is quote-based and customized for organizations requiring custom workflows, dedicated service, SSO, SLA options, and scalable configurations. Scrive does not list a permanent free eSign Online plan.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Scrive include eID and BankID in the base price?</strong></h3>


<p>eID/BankID access is not available as an add-on on Essential. Scrive lists eID/BankID as an add-on for Business and Enterprise plans, with additional fees per authentication. Scrive supports BankID Sweden, BankID Norway, MitID, Freja eID / OrgID, and other European eID methods. Teams requiring eID-authenticated signing should plan for Business pricing at minimum and request current add-on rates from Scrive Sales.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Scrive have an API, and how is it priced?</strong></h3>


<p>Scrive&#8217;s eSign API is a separate product from eSign Online, with quote-based pricing available on request from Scrive Sales. It is not a feature tier within the eSign Online plans. Scrive offers a 30-day free API Testbed for teams evaluating programmatic or embedded signing workflows before procurement. For development teams that need to build and test embedded signing without entering a procurement process, <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">Verdocs</a> offers full API access and 25 envelopes per month on its permanent free tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is Scrive eIDAS and GDPR compliant?</strong></h3>


<p>Yes. Scrive states that documents signed with Scrive conform to eIDAS, and Scrive is an EU-recognized Qualified Trust Service Provider certified to offer Qualified Electronic Signatures. The legal signature level depends on the method and configuration used. Scrive is also ISO 27001:2022 certified. Scrive seals signed documents using digital methods such as PKI/PAdES or KSI; PAdES is the current standard for new customers. Confirm plan-specific availability of sealing methods directly with Scrive.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the best Scrive alternative for developers?</strong></h3>


<p>For development teams building eSignature into their own applications, <a href="https://verdocs.com/">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for embedded use cases. Verdocs supports native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes full API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required. The platform is SOC 2 Type I certified with open-source SDKs under the <a href="https://tlo.mit.edu/understand-ip/exploring-mit-open-source-license-comprehensive-guide">MIT license</a>. For <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">fintech</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/real-estate"> real estate</a>, and <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/accounting">accounting</a> teams building embedded document workflows, Verdocs&#8217; native web component model provides deeper framework-native control compared to iframe-based approaches.</p>


<p></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/scrive-pricing/">Scrive Pricing: Plans, Costs &#038; Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Box Sign Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/box-sign-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Box Sign pricing ranges from $0/month (5 signature requests on the free plan) to $20/user/month on Business (billed annually), which includes unlimited signatures. Box Sign is included in every Box subscription at no additional charge. There is no standalone Box Sign product. Business at $20/user/month (billed annually) is the minimum tier for unlimited signatures; all [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/box-sign-pricing/">Box Sign Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Box Sign pricing ranges from $0/month (5 signature requests on the free plan) to $20/user/month on Business (billed annually), which includes unlimited signatures. Box Sign is included in every Box subscription at no additional charge. There is no standalone Box Sign product. Business at $20/user/month (billed annually) is the minimum tier for unlimited signatures; all plans below it cap requests at 5 to 15 per month.</p>


<p>The best Box Sign pricing tier for most teams is Business at $20/user/month (billed annually), which includes unlimited signatures, unlimited storage, a 5 GB file upload limit, and a minimum of 3 users. Teams already on Box get eSignature at no extra cost. Teams evaluating Box for eSignature alone should compare the bundled platform cost against standalone alternatives. The plans at a glance: Individual (free, 5 requests/month), Business Starter ($5/user/month, 10 requests/month), Business ($20/user/month, unlimited), Business Plus ($33/user/month, unlimited), and Enterprise (verify with Box Sales, unlimited).</p>


<p>The bundled model raises practical questions. Which plan tier unlocks unlimited signatures? Does Box Sign include an API for embedded workflows? What does the Sign API add-on cost, and is it equivalent to a dedicated developer platform? This guide covers every Box Sign pricing tier, what each plan includes, and how Box Sign compares to DocuSign, Adobe Sign, and API-first alternatives built for embedded use cases.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Box Sign is included in all Box plans at no additional charge; there is no standalone Box Sign subscription.</li>


<li>Free plan users get <strong>5 signature requests per month</strong>; Business plans and above offer <strong>unlimited signatures</strong>.</li>


<li><strong>Business is $20/user/month</strong> (annually) with unlimited storage, a 5 GB file upload limit, and a minimum of 3 users.</li>


<li>Box Sign offers APIs and embedded signing for eligible Business and above accounts, with a <strong>Sign API add-on at $1.20 per document</strong> (minimum 100 documents/year) for custom integrations.</li>


<li><strong>Batch send</strong> is available only on higher enterprise tiers (Enterprise Plus / Enterprise Advanced), not on Business plans.</li>


<li>Enterprise pricing should be verified directly on Box&#8217;s pricing page or with Box Sales.</li>


<li>Teams building eSignature into their own products should evaluate Box&#8217;s API model and customization depth against dedicated API-first platforms.</li>


<li>For developers building fully embeddable, white-labeled signing workflows, Verdocs provides 60+ native web components, open-source SDKs, and a permanent free tier with <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong> — no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Teams Research Box Sign Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three buyer scenarios account for most Box Sign pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Plan upgrade decisions.</strong> Teams already on Box want to confirm whether their current plan covers eSignature and what the signature request limits are. The jump from Business Starter (10 requests/month) to Business (unlimited) is the most consequential upgrade decision, and the cost difference of $15/user/month is not always obvious from the plan overview page.</li>


<li><strong>Bundled vs. standalone cost comparison.</strong> Teams evaluating Box for eSignature need to determine whether adopting a full content management platform to gain signing capabilities makes financial sense. Standalone eSignature tools may offer more feature depth at a comparable per-seat cost for teams that do not need Box&#8217;s broader collaboration features.</li>


<li><strong>Embedded signing and API requirements.</strong> Development teams building eSignature into their own applications need to understand what Box&#8217;s Sign API add-on covers, what it costs ($1.20/document, minimum 100 documents/year), and how its customization depth compares to platforms built specifically for API-first embedded signing.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>This guide answers all three before you need to contact sales.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s cost is tied entirely to Box&#8217;s subscription plans. There is no way to purchase Box Sign as a standalone product. Here is a summary of all Box plans and Box Sign allowances as of 2026:</p>


<p><strong>Individual (Free): $0</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>5 signature requests per month</li>


<li>No SMS verification</li>


<li>No templates</li>


<li>Best for: Individuals, occasional signing</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Personal Pro: $16/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>15 signature requests per month</li>


<li>SMS-based signer verification</li>


<li>Unlimited templates</li>


<li>Password protection on documents</li>


<li>Best for: Solo professionals, low-volume signing</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Business Starter: $5/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>10 signature requests per month</li>


<li>No SMS verification</li>


<li>Limited templates</li>


<li>Best for: Small teams, very low signing volume</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Business: $20/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited signature requests</li>


<li>SMS-based signer verification</li>


<li>Unlimited templates</li>


<li>Password protection</li>


<li>Minimum 3 users, unlimited storage, 5 GB file upload</li>


<li>Best for: Teams needing unlimited signatures</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Business Plus: $33/user/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited signature requests</li>


<li>Full Business feature set</li>


<li>Advanced DLP controls, enhanced eDiscovery, data residency</li>


<li>Best for: Regulated industries, compliance-heavy teams</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise: Verify pricing with Box Sales</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited signature requests</li>


<li>HIPAA-eligible configurations, <a href="https://www.fedramp.gov/">FedRAMP authorization</a>, legal hold</li>


<li>Best for: Large enterprises, government contractors</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise Plus: Custom</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited signature requests</li>


<li>Box Shield, Box Governance, Salesforce connector</li>


<li>Best for: Enterprises needing a full compliance and governance stack</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Box Sign plans at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Individual</strong> ($0): 5 requests/month, no SMS auth, no templates</li>


<li><strong>Personal Pro</strong> ($16/user/month annual): 15 requests/month, SMS auth, unlimited templates, password protection</li>


<li><strong>Business Starter</strong> ($5/user/month annual): 10 requests/month, no SMS auth, limited templates</li>


<li><strong>Business</strong> ($20/user/month annual): unlimited requests, SMS auth, unlimited templates, password protection, unlimited storage</li>


<li><strong>Business Plus</strong> ($33/user/month annual): unlimited requests, full Business features plus DLP, eDiscovery, data residency</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise</strong> (verify with Box Sales): unlimited requests, HIPAA, FedRAMP, legal hold</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise Plus</strong> (custom): unlimited requests, Box Shield, Box Governance, Salesforce connector</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The core differentiator between Business Starter and Business is the signature request limit: 10 per month versus unlimited, at a cost difference of $15/user/month. Teams whose signing workflows regularly exceed 10 documents per user monthly need Business as their effective minimum. All business-tier plans require a minimum of 3 users and are most cost-efficient on annual billing, which saves approximately 25 to 30% compared to month-to-month rates.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business Plan: Features and Signature Limits</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s Business plan is the entry point for unlimited signatures at $20/user/month (billed annually). It serves teams with active signing workflows who need a compliant eSignature integrated into their file management environment.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $20/user/month (billed annually)</li>


<li><strong>Signature Requests:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Minimum 3</li>


<li><strong>Storage:</strong> Unlimited, 5 GB file upload</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> Via Sign API add-on ($1.20/document, min. 100 docs/year)</li>


<li><strong>Batch Send:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Teams with active signing workflows already using Box</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Business plan includes:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Unlimited signature requests:</strong> no monthly cap on documents sent for signature</li>


<li><strong>SMS-based signer verification:</strong> one-time codes sent to the signer&#8217;s phone for identity confirmation before signing</li>


<li><strong>Unlimited templates:</strong> build reusable workflows once without re-configuring fields for recurring document types</li>


<li><strong>Password protection:</strong> require a password before signers can access individual documents</li>


<li><strong>Enhanced audit trail:</strong> timestamped log of all signing events, including IP addresses, timestamps, and authentication events</li>


<li><strong>SAML-based SSO:</strong> standard single sign-on integration for centralized access management</li>


<li><strong>Box Relay access:</strong> basic workflow automation for routing and approval sequences</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The 10-Document Cap on Business Starter</strong></h3>


<p>Business Starter at $5/user/month caps signature requests at 10 per user per month. For a team of 5 sending contracts, offer letters, or vendor agreements, that cap is reached after 2 documents per person per month. Business Starter is priced as an affordable entry point, but the signature limit makes it unsuitable for teams with regular signing volume. Teams approaching that threshold should move to Business ($20/user/month) as their baseline.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Teams of 3 or more already using Box for file management and collaboration that send a consistent volume of signing requests each month. Ideal for <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions">HR document workflows</a>, vendor contracts, <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">NDA workflows</a>, and internal approval documents that already live in Box and do not require programmatic API integration.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business Plus Plan: Compliance and Advanced Controls</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s Business Plus plan adds the security and compliance layer that regulated industries typically require, at $33/user/month (billed annually).</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $33/user/month (billed annually)</li>


<li><strong>Signature Requests:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Minimum 3</li>


<li><strong>Storage:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> Via Sign API add-on ($1.20/document, min. 100 docs/year)</li>


<li><strong>Batch Send:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Financial services, healthcare-adjacent, and legal teams needing compliance controls</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What Business Plus adds over Business:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Advanced data loss prevention (DLP):</strong> policy-based controls to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive content in Box-stored documents</li>


<li><strong>Granular permissions and group-level policy enforcement:</strong> admin controls for setting access rules at the team or group level</li>


<li><strong>Enhanced eDiscovery:</strong> search across all Box-managed content for legal and compliance review workflows</li>


<li><strong>Data residency configuration:</strong> designate geographic regions for data storage to meet local compliance requirements</li>


<li><strong>Higher API rate limits:</strong> increased throughput for teams using Box&#8217;s content API alongside signing workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Business vs Business Plus</strong></h3>


<p>Both tiers offer unlimited signatures. Business Plus is typically justified when compliance reporting, granular permission management, or data residency requirements are active selection criteria. At $13/user/month more than Business, the upgrade makes financial sense for financial services, healthcare-adjacent, and legal teams where those controls are non-negotiable.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Organizations in regulated industries where DLP controls, eDiscovery capabilities, and data residency options are required, alongside unlimited signing. <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">Financial services</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>, and<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a> teams handling high-sensitivity documents that need stronger governance than the Business tier provides.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan: Custom Pricing and Volume</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s Enterprise plan serves large organizations in regulated sectors with HIPAA-eligible configurations, FedRAMP authorization, legal hold capabilities, and dedicated account management.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> Verify directly with Box Sales</li>


<li><strong>Signature Requests:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Compliance:</strong> HIPAA-eligible, FedRAMP authorized, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Large enterprises, government contractors, regulated industries</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise-specific additions:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>HIPAA-eligible storage:</strong> configuration options for organizations handling protected health information</li>


<li><a href="https://www.fedramp.gov/"><strong>FedRAMP authorization</strong></a><strong>:</strong> enables use by U.S. federal agencies and government contractors</li>


<li><strong>Legal hold capabilities:</strong> preserve content in place for litigation and compliance investigations</li>


<li><strong>ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II:</strong> information security certifications for enterprise compliance documentation requirements</li>


<li><strong>Dedicated account management and implementation support:</strong> onboarding assistance and a named account contact</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise Plus additions:</strong> Box Shield (AI-powered threat detection), Box Governance (retention and legal hold infrastructure), and deep Salesforce integration for initiating and tracking Box Sign workflows directly from CRM records</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Large enterprises and government contractors in regulated sectors where HIPAA, FedRAMP, or legal hold requirements are primary selection criteria. Enterprise Plus is the right tier for organizations that need Box&#8217;s full compliance, governance, and AI capabilities alongside unlimited signing volume.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign Free Tier and Trial</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign is accessible through Box&#8217;s free Individual account, which provides 5 signature requests per month with no time limit. This is a permanent free tier, not a time-limited trial.</p>


<p><strong>Free Individual tier specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Signature requests:</strong> 5 per month, permanent</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> 1</li>


<li><strong>Templates:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>SMS verification:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Cost:</strong> $0, no credit card required</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Box also offers a 14-day free trial of its Business plan, which includes unlimited Box Sign signatures and the full Business feature set.</p>


<p><strong>Business plan trial specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Duration:</strong> 14 days from registration</li>


<li><strong>Signature requests:</strong> Unlimited during the trial</li>


<li><strong>Features:</strong> Full Business access, including SMS verification, templates, and audit trails</li>


<li><strong>Conversion:</strong> At the end of 14 days, the account transitions to a paid Business plan or reverts to the Individual free tier</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The 5-request permanent free tier is useful for individuals evaluating the signing experience before committing to a paid plan. The 14-day Business trial is suited for teams that need to validate unlimited-signature workflows before purchasing. Neither tier provides access to the Sign API add-on, which requires a paid Business or above subscription.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign&#8217;s Bundled Pricing Model</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign uses a bundled pricing model: eSignature is included with every Box subscription rather than sold as a separate product. This structural choice has significant cost implications depending on whether your team already uses Box.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How the Bundled Model Works</strong></h3>


<p>Each Box subscription tier includes a defined number of Box Sign signature requests per month, ranging from 5 on the free Individual plan to unlimited from Business upward. There is no per-document charge for web-app signing within the platform. The cost is absorbed into the per-seat subscription fee.</p>


<p>For teams already paying $20/user/month for Business (or higher), Box Sign adds eSignature at no incremental cost. Documents are created, sent for signature, signed, and stored in one environment without data moving between systems.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Per-Seat Cost Consideration</strong></h3>


<p>If your team does not currently use Box, adopting Box Sign means purchasing a full content management platform to access eSignature capabilities. A 10-person team on Box Business would spend $200/month ($20 x 10), with a 3-user minimum making the floor $60/month. The value depends on whether Box&#8217;s file management, workflow automation, and collaboration features are useful to your team beyond just signing.</p>


<p>Teams that only need eSignature, with no need for Box storage or collaboration workflows, will typically find standalone eSignature tools offer more feature depth at the same or lower cost.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Sign API Add-On Model</strong></h3>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s web-app signatures are bundled into plan pricing. API-driven signing, for teams embedding Box Sign into websites or custom applications, is priced separately through the Sign API add-on at $1.20 per document (minimum 100 documents, purchased annually). This means teams evaluating Box for programmatic or embedded signing workflows are looking at two cost layers: the base Box Business subscription plus the per-document Sign API add-on fee.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Sign API Add-On and Embedded Signing Costs</strong></h2>


<p>The Sign API add-on is a meaningful cost variable for teams evaluating Box Sign for programmatic or embedded workflows.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Sign API Add-On Pricing</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Cost:</strong> $1.20 per document</li>


<li><strong>Minimum:</strong> 100 documents per year (minimum annual commitment of $120)</li>


<li><strong>Billing:</strong> Purchased annually</li>


<li><strong>Eligibility:</strong> Requires a Box Business plan or above with an annual contract</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>For a team processing 500 signed documents per year via API, the Sign API add-on cost is $600/year on top of the Box Business subscription. For 1,000 documents, the add-on cost is $1,200/year. Teams should calculate their expected annual signing volume before committing to the add-on model.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What the Sign API Supports</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Programmatic send, tracking, and cancellation of signature requests via API endpoints</li>


<li>Webhook callbacks for real-time event notifications (document opened, signed, completed)</li>


<li>White-labeled and custom-branded signature request experiences</li>


<li>Embedding the Box Sign signing experience into websites or custom applications</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>The Sign API enables programmatic control and custom-branded signing experiences. Teams building applications where users sign documents without leaving the product UI should evaluate the depth of front-end customization available through Box&#8217;s Sign API against their design system requirements. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> with native web components provide a faster path to prototype-stage evaluation before entering a procurement process.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign vs DocuSign vs Adobe Sign vs Verdocs</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign vs DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s bundled model is cost-efficient for teams already using Box. DocuSign Standard and Business Pro annual plans include up to 100 envelopes per user per year; monthly plans include up to 10 envelopes per user per month, with excess potentially billed pay-as-you-go. DocuSign includes conditional logic fields, payment collection via Stripe integration, advanced recipient management, and 400+ pre-built integrations with CRM, HRIS, and ERP platforms. Production API access is sold through DocuSign developer/API plans starting at $50/month for 40 envelopes/month. DocuSign provides an API and SDK for embedded signing workflows using an iframe-based embedding model.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign vs Adobe Sign</strong></h3>


<p>Adobe Acrobat for teams provides eSignature alongside PDF editing and document management. Current pricing is Acrobat Standard for teams at $16.99/month per license and Acrobat Pro for teams at $23.99/month per license (annual, billed monthly). Adobe Acrobat for teams includes e-signature features alongside its PDF and Creative Cloud ecosystem. Confirm send limits and Acrobat Sign Solutions requirements on Adobe&#8217;s official plan comparison for high-volume use cases. Like DocuSign, Adobe provides iframe-based embedded signing for web applications.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Box Sign vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is the most developer-focused <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embeddable eSignature platform</a> for teams building signing directly into their own applications. Verdocs supports both native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration, giving development teams full CSS control over every signing UI element. Open-source SDKs (MIT license), SOC 2 Type I certification, 2048-bit RSA encryption, HSM key storage, and PKI digital certificates address the security and compliance requirements that development teams verify before integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Pricing on Box Sign</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s Sign API add-on is available on Business plans and above at $1.20 per document (minimum 100 documents/year). Development teams evaluating Box Sign for programmatic signing must hold a Box Business subscription with an annual contract before purchasing the add-on. There is no self-serve developer trial for the Sign API.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What the Sign API Supports</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>RESTful API endpoints for creating, listing, resending, and cancelling sign requests</li>


<li>Programmatic document sending and status tracking from external applications</li>


<li>Webhook callbacks for real-time event notifications (document opened, signed, completed)</li>


<li>White-labeled and custom-branded signature request experiences</li>


<li>Embedding the Box Sign signing experience into websites or custom applications</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>The Sign API enables custom-branded signing experiences embedded in external applications. Teams building applications where end users sign documents natively inside the product UI, without a redirect to Box&#8217;s interface, should evaluate the level of front-end component customization the Sign API supports against their design system requirements. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> provide faster time-to-evaluation for teams that need to prototype before entering procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>Box Sign&#8217;s pricing model is well-matched for a specific buyer. Here is how to decide without a sales call.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing Box Sign:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For teams already using Box with active signing volume:</strong> Business at $20/user/month (billed annually) delivers strong value. Unlimited signatures, templates, SMS verification, and audit trails are included with no additional tool cost on top of the Box subscription.</li>


<li><strong>For teams requiring compliance controls or data residency:</strong> Business Plus at $33/user/month adds DLP, enhanced eDiscovery, and data residency options. The upgrade is justified for financial services, healthcare-adjacent, and legal teams where those controls are required.</li>


<li><strong>For large enterprises in regulated industries:</strong> Enterprise provides HIPAA-eligible configurations, FedRAMP authorization, legal hold capabilities, and dedicated implementation support. Enterprise Plus adds Box Shield, Box Governance, and the Salesforce connector for teams needing the full compliance and governance stack.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier, and open-source SDKs (<a href="https://tlo.mit.edu/understand-ip/exploring-mit-open-source-license-comprehensive-guide">MIT license</a>). Verdocs supports both native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, real estate, and accounting teams building regulated document workflows:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal">Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific <a href="https://verdocs.com/product">embedded eSignature</a> with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The bundled model is genuinely favorable for Box Sign when your team already uses Box and signing volume is active, but does not require deep API customization. When self-serve API evaluation, native web components, and embedded UI control matter, evaluate developer-first alternatives before committing to a platform add-on model.</p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup">Start for free</a> and build fully embeddable eSignature workflows in your application.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is Box Sign free?</strong></h3>


<p>Box Sign is not permanently free at useful volumes, but the free Individual account provides 5 signature requests per month with no time limit and no credit card required. Box also offers a 14-day free trial of the Business plan, which includes unlimited signatures. After the trial, the account transitions to a paid plan or reverts to the Individual free tier. Business is the lowest paid tier with unlimited signatures at $20/user/month (billed annually, 3-user minimum).</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does Box Sign cost per month?</strong></h3>


<p>Box Sign is included with every Box subscription. The free Individual plan provides 5 requests/month at no cost. Business Starter is $5/user/month (billed annually) with 10 requests/month. Business is $20/user/month (billed annually) with unlimited requests and a 3-user minimum, making the effective floor $60/month. Business Plus is $33/user/month (billed annually). Enterprise pricing should be verified directly with Box Sales. Teams that need API-driven signing should also factor in the Sign API add-on at $1.20 per document (minimum 100 documents/year).</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the minimum cost for unlimited Box Sign signatures?</strong></h3>


<p>The minimum cost for unlimited Box Sign signatures is Business at $20/user/month (billed annually) with a 3-user minimum, putting the floor at $60/month for any team. Month-to-month Business pricing is $30/user/month, a 50% premium over annual billing. Business Starter at $5/user/month caps signature requests at 10 per user per month and does not provide unlimited signing at any billing cadence.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Does Box Sign have an API?</strong></h3>


<p>Yes. Box Sign offers APIs and embedded signing capabilities for eligible Business accounts and above. The Sign API add-on is available at $1.20 per document (minimum 100 documents, purchased annually) for teams embedding Box Sign in websites or custom applications. The Sign API supports programmatic send, tracking, and cancellation of signature requests, as well as white-labeled and custom-branded signature request experiences. Teams evaluating deep embedded workflows should compare Box&#8217;s Sign API model against platforms designed specifically for<a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks"> API-first embedded signing</a>.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What is the best Box Sign alternative for developers?</strong></h3>


<p>For development teams building eSignature into their own applications, <a href="https://verdocs.com/">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for embedded use cases. Verdocs supports native web components and iframe options, with web components recommended for deeper styling and framework-native integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes 25 envelopes/month with no credit card required. The platform is SOC 2 Type I certified with open-source SDKs under the <a href="https://tlo.mit.edu/understand-ip/exploring-mit-open-source-license-comprehensive-guide">MIT license</a>. For <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">fintech</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> legal</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/real-estate"> real estate</a>, and<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/accounting"> accounting</a> teams building embedded document workflows, Verdocs&#8217; native web component model provides deeper framework-native control than iframe-based approaches.</p>


<p></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/box-sign-pricing/">Box Sign Pricing: Complete Guide (2026)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>eSignGlobal Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs, and Tiers Guide</title>
		<link>https://verdocs.com/esignglobal-pricing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://verdocs.com/?p=14017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>eSignGlobal pricing is structured across three tiers: Essential at $16.60 per month (billed annually, $199.20/year), Professional at custom pricing via sales, and Enterprise at fully custom rates. All plans include unlimited user seats with no per-user fees. The key cost driver is document volume, as the Essential plan caps at 100 documents per year. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/esignglobal-pricing/">eSignGlobal Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs, and Tiers Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>eSignGlobal pricing is structured across three tiers: Essential at $16.60 per month (billed annually, $199.20/year), Professional at custom pricing via sales, and Enterprise at fully custom rates. All plans include unlimited user seats with no per-user fees. The key cost driver is document volume, as the Essential plan caps at 100 documents per year.</p>


<p>The best eSignGlobal pricing plan for most teams is the Essential plan at $16.60/month (billed annually), which covers 100 documents per year and unlimited user seats with no per-user fees. Professional pricing is available via sales quote (not publicly listed) and adds API access, bulk sending, and AI-assisted features. Enterprise is custom. The three tiers at a glance: Essential ($16.60/month), Professional (custom via sales), and Enterprise (custom), all with unlimited seats on a single flat subscription.</p>


<p>Three tiers cover the range: Essential for small teams, Professional for API-heavy workflows, and Enterprise for unlimited volume. The plan structure raises practical questions. Which tier includes API access? How do document limits apply in practice? What costs does the pricing page leave out?</p>


<p>This guide covers every eSignGlobal pricing tier and what each plan includes. We compare eSignGlobal cost to DocuSign, Adobe Sign, and developer-first alternatives, and map which tier fits each buyer type.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h2>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The <strong>Essential plan</strong> is $16.60/month billed annually ($199.20/year) and includes 100 documents per year, unlimited user seats, and access code verification.</li>


<li>The <strong>Professional plan</strong> is available via sales contact and adds API access, bulk sending, webforms, and AI-assisted features including contract risk assessment and document translation.</li>


<li>The <strong>Enterprise plan</strong> offers fully custom pricing for unlimited document volumes, biometric identity verification, and dedicated regional infrastructure.</li>


<li><strong>No per-seat fees apply at any tier.</strong> The entire team shares one subscription with no per-user billing.</li>


<li>eSignGlobal offers a <strong>30-day free trial</strong> with up to 5 envelopes, full feature access, and no credit card required.</li>


<li>eSignGlobal reports <strong>20 to 30% lower pricing</strong> than major global platforms for comparable document volumes.</li>


<li>For development teams building embedded signing into their own applications, Verdocs provides a self-serve free tier with API access, <strong>25 envelopes per month</strong>, and 60+ native web components with no credit card required.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Buyers Research eSignGlobal Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>Three buyer scenarios account for most eSignGlobal pricing searches.</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Volume uncertainty.</strong> The Essential plan&#8217;s 100-document annual cap is the real variable, not the monthly fee. Teams sending 8 or more signing requests per month will exhaust the limit within a year, often before realizing it. Understanding where that ceiling lands in practice is the most common reason buyers research this page.</li>


<li><strong>The Professional plan&#8217;s pricing opacity.</strong> eSignGlobal does not publish Professional plan costs. Development teams that need API access must request a sales quote before assessing integration feasibility, a step that platforms with self-serve developer tiers do not require.</li>


<li><strong>DocuSign cost comparison.</strong> eSignGlobal claims 20 to 30% lower pricing than major global platforms. Verifying that claim requires understanding the structural difference: per-document flat-rate versus per-user-per-month, not just comparing headline plan prices.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>This guide answers all three before you need to contact sales.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal Pricing Plans in 2026</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal structures its pricing across three tiers. The Essential plan is self-serve with published pricing; the Professional and Enterprise tiers require contacting the sales team for a quote.</p>


<p>Here is a summary of all eSignGlobal plans and costs as of 2026:</p>


<p><strong>Essential: $16.60/month (billed annually)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>100 documents per year</li>


<li>Unlimited user seats</li>


<li>Access code verification</li>


<li>Reusable templates</li>


<li>Best for: Small teams, APAC compliance</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Professional: Custom (via sales)</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Higher document volume</li>


<li>API access (RESTful)</li>


<li>Bulk send and webforms</li>


<li>AI-assisted features</li>


<li>Best for: Mid-size teams, API workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise: Fully custom</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Unlimited documents</li>


<li>Biometric identity verification</li>


<li>Dedicated regional infrastructure</li>


<li>Custom SLA and support</li>


<li>Best for: Large enterprises, regulated industries</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>eSignGlobal plans at a glance:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Essential</strong> ($16.60/month annual): 100 documents/year, unlimited users, access code verification, reusable templates, audit trail</li>


<li><strong>Professional</strong> (custom via sales): higher document volume, API access, bulk send, webforms, AI risk assessment, SSO, advanced analytics</li>


<li><strong>Enterprise</strong> (fully custom): unlimited documents, biometric verification, data hosting in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Frankfurt, custom SLA</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The core differentiator between Essential and Professional is API access and bulk sending. These are features that require integration with external systems or high-volume sending workflows. All three tiers share the no-seat-fee model: all users on the account share the same subscription at no additional per-user charge.</p>


<p>eSignGlobal positions its pricing at 20 to 30% below major global platforms like DocuSign and Adobe Sign. The advantage is strongest in Asia-Pacific markets, where native compliance integrations reduce implementation overhead.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Essential Plan: Features and Document Limits</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s Essential plan is the entry-level tier at $16.60/month billed annually ($199.20/year). It serves small teams and organizations with moderate signing volumes who need compliant e-signatures without per-user pricing.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> $16.60/month (billed annually, $199.20/year)</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> 100 per year</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> No</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Small teams, APAC-focused organizations, low-volume signing</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Essential plan includes:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>100 documents per year:</strong> the annual cap works out to roughly 8 documents per month</li>


<li><strong>Unlimited user seats:</strong> every person on the team can log in at no additional cost</li>


<li><strong>Access code verification:</strong> one-time passcodes delivered by email or SMS for signer identity confirmation</li>


<li><strong>Reusable templates:</strong> build workflows once and reuse them without re-configuring fields</li>


<li><strong>Audit trail:</strong> timestamped log of all signing events, IP addresses, and identity confirmations</li>


<li><strong>Mobile signing:</strong> signers complete documents from any mobile browser without a native app</li>


<li><strong>Multi-language interface:</strong> platform UI supports multiple languages for global teams</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The Essential plan does not include API access, bulk sending, webforms, or the AI-assisted features available at higher tiers. Teams that need to trigger signing requests programmatically, from a CRM workflow, onboarding system, or custom application, need to upgrade to Professional.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The 100-Document Cap in Practice</strong></h3>


<p>For a 10-person team that collectively sends 20 signing requests per month, the Essential plan&#8217;s 100-document annual cap covers less than half that volume. The per-document model is efficient when individual users send low volumes but the whole team participates, since each additional team member costs nothing. The constraint arrives when aggregate sending volume exceeds 100 documents per year.</p>


<p>Teams approaching that threshold should evaluate Professional plan pricing through eSignGlobal&#8217;s sales team before committing to the Essential plan long-term.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Small teams (5 to 15 people) in APAC-focused markets that send fewer than 100 signing requests per year and do not require programmatic API integration. Ideal for employment agreements, vendor contracts, and<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> NDA workflows</a> where the priority is legal compliance and multi-user access, not automation or bulk sending.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Professional Plan: API, Bulk Send, and AI Features</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s Professional plan unlocks the platform&#8217;s full technical capabilities. Pricing is available via sales contact rather than published on a self-serve page, a factor for development teams that need to evaluate integration costs before entering a procurement process.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> Custom (contact eSignGlobal sales)</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> Higher volume (cap removed)</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>API Access:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Bulk Send:</strong> Yes</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Mid-size organizations, API-driven workflows, high-volume signing</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>What the Professional plan adds over Essential:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>API access:</strong> RESTful integration for triggering signing requests from external applications, CRMs, and workflow systems</li>


<li><strong>Bulk send:</strong> distribute one template to hundreds or thousands of signers simultaneously, each in an independent session</li>


<li><strong>Webforms:</strong> embeddable signing forms on websites for self-initiated signing without staff involvement</li>


<li><strong>AI-assisted features:</strong> contract risk assessment and document translation for cross-border agreements</li>


<li><strong>SSO (Single Sign-On):</strong> SAML-based authentication for centralized enterprise access control</li>


<li><strong>Advanced analytics:</strong> document tracking dashboards, completion rate reporting, and detailed audit views</li>


<li><strong>Priority support:</strong> dedicated support access beyond the standard channels on the Essential plan</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The Professional plan removes the document volume cap that applies at the Essential tier. Organizations with high-frequency signing workflows, including <a href="https://verdocs.com/esignature-api-fintech-apps/">financial services teams</a>,<a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/insurance"> insurance operations</a>, and HR at scale, typically land here.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API Access on Professional</strong></h3>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s API supports backend integration through REST endpoints with SDKs available in major programming languages. The API enables triggered signing requests, webhook callbacks for status updates, and template-based document generation. Developers evaluating eSignGlobal for API integration should note that full API documentation is accessible after sales contact, not through a public developer portal or self-serve trial.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Mid-size organizations with signing volumes exceeding the Essential tier&#8217;s 100-document annual cap, or teams building API integrations with CRMs, ERPs, or internal workflow systems. High-volume HR operations and organizations in APAC markets that need bulk-send and programmatic signing triggers.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Enterprise Plan: Custom Pricing and Volume</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s Enterprise plan serves organizations with unlimited document volume requirements, complex identity verification needs, and multi-region compliance demands across APAC, Europe, and the Americas.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Plan Summary:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Price:</strong> Fully custom (contact eSignGlobal sales)</li>


<li><strong>Documents:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Unlimited</li>


<li><strong>Identity Verification:</strong> Biometric, government ID, digital identity integration</li>


<li><strong>Best For:</strong> Large enterprises, regulated industries, multi-jurisdiction operations</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enterprise-specific additions:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Unlimited documents:</strong> no annual or monthly caps on signing volume regardless of team size</li>


<li><strong>Dedicated regional infrastructure:</strong> data hosting options in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Frankfurt for data sovereignty compliance</li>


<li><strong>Advanced identity verification:</strong> biometric face recognition, government-issued ID checks, and direct integration with government digital identity systems</li>


<li><strong>Custom SLA:</strong> uptime guarantees and support response times negotiated per contract</li>


<li><strong>White-glove implementation:</strong> dedicated onboarding, professional services, and integration support</li>


<li><strong>Volume API throughput:</strong> higher API rate limits for enterprise-scale automated workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>Enterprise buyers typically include <a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/fintech">large financial institutions</a>, insurance carriers, and government contractors operating in APAC markets where eSignGlobal&#8217;s native integrations with government digital identity systems provide regulatory compliance coverage.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Best For</strong></h3>


<p>Large enterprises with unlimited document volume requirements and multi-jurisdiction compliance obligations across APAC, Europe, and the Americas. Banking KYC workflows, government contracting, large-scale insurance carrier operations, and cross-border financial services where biometric identity verification and data sovereignty requirements are primary selection criteria.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal Free Trial</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal offers a 30-day free trial that provides full platform access, including Professional-tier features, without requiring a credit card at registration.</p>


<p><strong>Free trial specifics:</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Duration:</strong> 30 days from registration</li>


<li><strong>Envelopes:</strong> Up to 5 envelopes during the trial period</li>


<li><strong>Users:</strong> Unlimited — the entire team can be invited and participate</li>


<li><strong>Features:</strong> Full access, including Professional features like API and bulk send during the trial window</li>


<li><strong>Conversion:</strong> At the end of the 30-day period, the account transitions to the selected paid plan or deactivates if no plan is chosen</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The 5-envelope cap during the trial is worth factoring in for teams running a functional pilot. Five signing requests validate the signer experience and basic workflow configuration, but teams with complex multi-party workflows or integration requirements may find the cap constrains meaningful technical testing. Requesting a trial extension for more thorough evaluation is typically available through eSignGlobal&#8217;s sales team.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal&#8217;s Per-Document Pricing Model</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal uses a per-document (<a href="https://verdocs.com/">envelope-based</a>) pricing model rather than per-user pricing. This structural choice has significant cost implications depending on team size and signing frequency.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Envelope Counting Works</strong></h3>


<p>Each document sent for signature counts as one envelope against the plan&#8217;s annual limit. A multi-party document sent to three signers simultaneously counts as one envelope, not three. Reminder sends and status checks on an in-progress envelope do not consume additional envelopes. A new envelope is consumed only when a fresh document is sent for signature.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The No-Seat-Fee Advantage</strong></h3>


<p>Unlike DocuSign&#8217;s per-user pricing (<a href="https://www.g2.com/products/docusign/pricing">$25 to $40/user/month</a> on paid tiers) or Adobe Sign&#8217;s per-license model, eSignGlobal includes unlimited users on every plan. For a 20-person team, the cost difference is significant:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>DocuSign Standard for 20 users: $25 x 20 = $500/month ($6,000/year)</li>


<li>eSignGlobal Essential for 20 users: $16.60/month flat ($199.20/year)</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The savings are most pronounced for teams where many people need signing access but aggregate sending volume stays below the Essential plan&#8217;s 100-document annual cap, such as finance teams reviewing contracts, HR departments initiating offer letters, or operations teams handling vendor agreements.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Volume vs. Seat Cost Trade-Off</strong></h3>


<p>The counterpart to the no-seat-fee model is the annual document cap at the Essential tier. Organizations where signing is a high-frequency workflow, such as sales teams sending proposals daily or insurance agents processing applications weekly, will exhaust the Essential tier&#8217;s 100 annual envelopes quickly and need Professional plan pricing to match their volume. In those scenarios, comparing Professional plan pricing against per-user competitors on a per-document-sent basis gives a clearer total cost picture.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Identity Verification Add-Ons and Costs</strong></h2>


<p>Identity verification is a meaningful cost variable in eSignGlobal&#8217;s overall pricing picture, particularly for regulated industries where basic access code verification is insufficient.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Verification Methods by Plan</strong></h3>


<p><strong>Standard verification (included in all plans):</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Access code verification: one-time passcode sent to signers via email or SMS</li>


<li>Audit trail: timestamped record of all signing events, including IP addresses, geolocation, and browser fingerprint</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p><strong>Enhanced verification (available on Professional and Enterprise):</strong></p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>SMS/phone verification: per-use charges apply; applicable rates vary by region and message volume</li>


<li>Biometric face recognition: per-document fee for regulated industry workflows requiring identity confirmation at signing</li>


<li>Government ID document check: validates photo IDs against document databases for KYC-level verification</li>


<li>Government digital identity integration: Hong Kong iAM Smart and Singapore Singpass for APAC commercial and government workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Verification Cost Estimates</strong></h3>


<p>Industry research indicates that <a href="https://www.iso.org/isoiec-27001-information-security.html">electronic signature verification</a> features in e-signature platforms typically add $0.50 to $2.00 per verification for SMS and knowledge-based authentication methods, with biometric verification fees ranging higher depending on volume commitments and provider-specific rates. Organizations in financial services, insurance, and legal industries should include per-verification costs in their eSignGlobal total cost estimate alongside plan subscription fees.</p>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s access code verification is included at no additional cost at every tier and covers standard business use cases. Enhanced verification is a costs-as-used add-on rather than a fixed-price plan feature.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal Pricing vs Competitors</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal vs DocuSign</strong></h3>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s flat-rate model is more cost-efficient for teams of five or more users, even at the Essential tier. A five-person team on DocuSign Standard ($25/user) pays $125/month; the same team on eSignGlobal Essential pays $16.60/month. The structural difference is DocuSign&#8217;s higher document volume allowance at the Standard tier (100 envelopes per user per year, or 500 total for five users) versus eSignGlobal Essential&#8217;s 100 total per year across all users.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal vs Adobe Sign</strong></h3>


<p>Adobe Sign starts at a comparable entry-level price for individual users but applies seat fees for team plans. eSignGlobal&#8217;s no-seat model is consistently more affordable for teams. Adobe Sign&#8217;s differentiation is its integration with the Adobe Acrobat and Creative Cloud ecosystem for organizations already in that stack.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal vs Verdocs</strong></h3>


<p><a href="https://verdocs.com/comparison">Verdocs</a> is the most developer-friendly <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">embeddable eSignature platform</a> for teams building signing directly into their own applications. Verdocs is built on an API-first design with 60+ native web components (React, Angular, Vue, vanilla JS, Node.js, TypeScript) and full CSS control for white-label in-app signing with no iframes required. Open-source SDKs (MIT license), SOC 2 Type II certification, 2048-bit RSA encryption, HSM key storage, and PKI digital certificates address the security and compliance requirements development teams verify before integration. The <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">free tier</a> includes API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>API and Developer Pricing on eSignGlobal</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal restricts API access to the Professional plan. Development teams evaluating eSignGlobal for programmatic signing must contact sales for Professional plan pricing. There is no self-serve API access on the Essential tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What eSignGlobal&#8217;s API Supports</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>RESTful API endpoints for document sending, status checking, and workflow management</li>


<li>Webhook callbacks for real-time event notifications (document opened, signed, completed)</li>


<li>Template-based document generation from API calls using pre-configured templates</li>


<li>Multi-language SDK support for backend integration (specific languages confirmed via documentation request)</li>


<li>OpenAPI specification for API client generation</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Embedded Signing Considerations</strong></h3>


<p>API access on eSignGlobal enables backend integration for triggering and tracking signing requests. The platform does not ship embeddable UI components for in-app signing, meaning there are no pre-built front-end elements that render inside a host application&#8217;s interface. Teams building applications where users sign without leaving the product UI need a platform that ships pre-built embeddable components. Custom front-end development is required to wrap the API for in-app signing on eSignGlobal.</p>


<p>Development teams should factor the sales-required pricing process into their evaluation timeline. Platforms offering <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">self-serve developer tiers</a> provide faster time-to-evaluation for teams that need to prototype before entering procurement.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>eSignGlobal APAC Compliance and Regional Pricing</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s strongest differentiation is its compliance coverage for Asia-Pacific markets, an area where global platforms typically require additional configuration, legal consultation, and identity provider setup to achieve equivalent coverage.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Regional Compliance Capabilities</strong></h3>


<p><strong>Hong Kong — iAM Smart integration:</strong> eSignGlobal supports direct integration with Hong Kong&#8217;s <a href="https://www.iamsmart.gov.hk/en/">government digital identity system</a>, enabling government-to-business level identity verification without additional identity provider setup. Organizations processing financial contracts, property transactions, or government-related documents in Hong Kong benefit from native compliance at the platform level.</p>


<p><strong>Singapore — Singpass integration:</strong> Native<a href="https://www.singpass.gov.sg/"> Singpass</a> support for Singapore&#8217;s national digital identity system covers regulated commercial workflows and government-adjacent processes that require verified individual identity confirmation beyond standard email or SMS access codes.</p>


<p><strong>Data sovereignty:</strong> Regional data hosting in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Frankfurt supports compliance with local data residency requirements. Financial services and government organizations in jurisdictions with strict data sovereignty laws can host their signing data within the required geography.</p>


<p><strong>Broad APAC regulatory alignment:</strong> eSignGlobal reports compliance with electronic signature regulations across more than 100 countries. Coverage includes:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asian markets</li>


<li>ESIGN/UETA (United States) and eIDAS (European Union)</li>


<li>ISO 27001 and ISO 27018 information security standards</li>


<li>GDPR for European data protection compliance</li>


<li>FDA 21 CFR Part 11 for life sciences workflows</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What APAC Compliance Means for Total Cost</strong></h3>


<p>APAC organizations that need compliant e-signatures in markets like Hong Kong and Singapore often incur significant implementation costs with global platforms, including additional identity verification provider contracts, regional legal review, and custom infrastructure configuration. eSignGlobal&#8217;s native integrations reduce those implementation costs, which means total cost of ownership may favor eSignGlobal even when plan prices appear comparable to alternatives.</p>


<p>Organizations in North America or Western Europe, where ESIGN/UETA or eIDAS compliance is sufficient, should assess whether eSignGlobal&#8217;s APAC infrastructure adds meaningful value for their specific use case.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Final Verdict</strong></h2>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s pricing model is well-matched for a specific buyer. Here&#8217;s how to decide without a sales call.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams choosing eSignGlobal:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For APAC-focused teams with fewer than 100 documents per year:</strong> The Essential plan at $16.60/month delivers strong value. The no-seat-fee model produces significant savings for teams of 5+ where multiple people need signing access but aggregate volume stays moderate.</li>


<li><strong>For high-volume workflows or teams requiring API access:</strong> The Essential plan reaches its ceiling quickly. The Professional plan (custom pricing via sales) removes document caps and adds API access, bulk send, and AI features.</li>


<li><strong>For large enterprises with multi-region compliance requirements:</strong> Enterprise offers unlimited documents, biometric identity verification, and dedicated regional infrastructure across APAC and Europe.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>For teams where an alternative is the better fit:</strong></h3>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>For developers embedding signing into their own application:</strong> <a href="https://verdocs.com/api-sdks">Verdocs</a> is purpose-built for this use case, with 60+ native web components, full CSS control over every signing UI element, a permanent free tier, and open-source SDKs (MIT license). eSignGlobal&#8217;s API requires a Professional plan and does not include embeddable UI components.</li>


<li><strong>For legal, insurance, and real estate teams with regulated document workflows:</strong><a href="https://verdocs.com/solutions/legal"> Verdocs</a> provides industry-specific embedded eSignature with full document lifecycle management, purpose-built for regulated signing workflows inside practice management or client portal software.</li>
</ul>


<p></p>


<p>The flat-rate no-seat model is genuinely favorable for eSignGlobal when the team size is large and the document volume is moderate. When self-serve API evaluation and embedded UI components matter, evaluate developer-first alternatives before committing to a sales-gated tier.</p>


<p><a href="https://app.verdocs.com/signup"><strong>Start for free</strong></a> and launch your first embeddable eSignature workflow today.</p>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions</strong></h2>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is eSignGlobal free?</strong></h3>


<p>eSignGlobal is not permanently free, but it offers a 30-day free trial with up to 5 envelopes, full feature access across all plan tiers, and unlimited users,no credit card required. After the trial period, the account transitions to a paid plan or is deactivated. The Essential plan starts at $16.60/month (billed annually) as the lowest paid tier.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How much does eSignGlobal cost per year?</strong></h3>


<p>eSignGlobal&#8217;s Essential plan costs $199.20 per year when billed annually ($16.60/month). The Professional plan requires a sales quote and is not publicly priced on the eSignGlobal website. Enterprise pricing is fully custom-based on volume, compliance requirements, and regional infrastructure needs. Teams comparing annual costs should factor in that eSignGlobal&#8217;s per-account billing model significantly reduces total cost for teams of five or more.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Is eSignGlobal&#8217;s 100-document cap per user or per account?</strong></h3>


<p>The Essential plan&#8217;s 100 documents per year is an account-level cap, not per user. A team of 10 people shares the same 100-envelope pool. This matters when comparing eSignGlobal Essential to DocuSign Standard, which provides 100 envelopes per user per year (1,000 total for a 10-person team). If your team sends more than roughly 8 documents per month collectively, the Essential plan cap will be a constraint before the end of year one.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Do I need to contact sales to get eSignGlobal API access?</strong></h3>


<p>Yes. API access is only available on the Professional plan, and Professional plan pricing is not published — you have to contact eSignGlobal&#8217;s sales team for a quote. If you need to evaluate API integration feasibility before entering a procurement process, look for platforms that offer self-serve developer tiers with API access included at no cost. <a href="https://verdocs.com/pricing/api-pricing">Verdocs</a> offers exactly that: free API access and 25 envelopes per month with no credit card required.</p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What compliance certifications does eSignGlobal hold?</strong></h3>


<p>eSignGlobal holds<a href="https://www.iso.org/isoiec-27001-information-security.html"> ISO 27001</a> and ISO 27018 certifications for information security management, and complies with GDPR, eIDAS (European Union), ESIGN/UETA (United States), and FDA 21 CFR Part 11 for life sciences workflows. Regional compliance includes native integrations with Hong Kong&#8217;s iAM Smart and Singapore&#8217;s Singpass for APAC digital identity verification. The platform operates data centers in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Frankfurt.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://verdocs.com/esignglobal-pricing/">eSignGlobal Pricing 2026: Plans, Costs, and Tiers Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://verdocs.com">Verdocs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>