Proposify has earned a solid reputation in the proposal management space with a 4.6/5 rating on G2 from 1,130+ reviews. However, as development teams increasingly require embeddable document workflows, API-first architectures, and complete white-label control, many organizations are evaluating alternatives that better fit their technical requirements. Whether you’re building custom signing experiences into your SaaS product or seeking more flexible pricing models, these six Proposify alternatives offer distinct capabilities for 2026. For teams prioritizing API and SDK integration, the landscape has expanded significantly beyond traditional proposal-centric platforms.
Key Takeaways
- API-first architecture separates embedded solutions from SaaS tools: Verdocs provides 60+ web components with native React, Angular, and Vue wrappers for complete customization, while many proposal-centric platforms prioritize end-user workflows where embedded and white-label depth may be more limited
- White-label capabilities vary dramatically across platforms: Verdocs offers full brand control including email templates, embed styling, and bring-your-own signing certificates through modular HSM support—critical for ISVs and software publishers embedding eSignature into their products
- Pricing models determine total cost of ownership: Platform pricing for resale and unlimited envelope options from Verdocs contrast with per-user pricing from Proposify and traditional per-user or per-document fees from other providers
- Microsoft ecosystem integration matters for enterprise teams: Verdocs is the first fully embeddable eSignature solution within Microsoft Commercial Cloud, including Teams, Dynamics 365, and Power Platform—a positioning other alternatives have yet to match
- Implementation speed impacts time-to-market: Verdocs’s web component architecture can support rapid proof-of-concept workflows using ready-to-use components, while traditional platforms may require more extensive custom development for embedded use cases
1. Verdocs — API-First White-Label eSignature for Developers and ISVs
Verdocs is an API-first eSignature platform designed specifically for developers and software publishers who need to embed fully customizable document workflows directly into their applications. Unlike proposal-centric tools designed for end-users, Verdocs provides the infrastructure for building bespoke signing experiences without redirecting customers to third-party platforms.
Key Features:
- Over 60 web components covering the entire document lifecycle: template creation, signing, authentication, search, and management
- Native wrappers for React, Angular, and Vue frameworks with full styling control
- True white-label capability eliminating vendor branding throughout the signing experience
- Modular HSM support allowing organizations to bring their own signing certificates
- Platform and partner pricing enabling software publishers to resell eSignature capabilities
- Freemium tier with 25 envelopes per month and 5 templates—no credit card required
- Isomorphic JavaScript SDK working in both browser and Node.js environments
Pricing Structure:
- Basic Plan: $0/month (25 envelopes/month, 5 templates, unlimited test documents; no credit card required)
- Pro Plan: Custom pricing (usage-based; sized to your needs)
- Platform Pricing: Custom pricing (account-based model for ISVs reselling/white-labeling; contact sales)
- Contact for API pricing details
The platform’s core strength lies in its web component architecture. As noted in the Verdocs technical documentation, developers gain full control over styling and behavior compared to iframe-based implementations—enabling seamless integration with existing application design systems.
For Microsoft ecosystem users, Verdocs offers exclusive positioning as the first fully embeddable, end-to-end eSignature solution for Microsoft Commercial Cloud. This includes native connectors for Power Automate, embedded experiences within Microsoft Teams, and integration with Dynamics 365 Business Central and Customer Engagement applications.
Security and compliance features include:
- PKI digital signatures using 2048 RSA encryption
- SOC 2 Type 1 certification with attestation reports available upon request
- E-SIGN Act and UETA compliance for all signatures
- Documents encrypted at rest and in transit with tamper-proof seals
- Comprehensive audit trails capturing IP addresses, timestamps, and authentication methods
The product overview details how teams can get up and running quickly using the web component approach—a significant advantage for development teams evaluating document workflow solutions.
2. PandaDoc — Document Automation with CPQ Capabilities
PandaDoc has established itself as a comprehensive document automation platform, earning a 4.7/5 rating on G2 from 3,290+ reviews. The platform extends beyond eSignature to include Configure-Price-Quote (CPQ) functionality and workflow automation.
Standout Capabilities:
- Free eSign plan providing basic signature functionality
- Document templates for proposals, contracts, and quotes
- Strong CPQ features for complex pricing scenarios
- Native CRM integrations including Salesforce and HubSpot
- Real-time document tracking and analytics
- Approval workflows for deal management
Pricing Structure:
- Launch: $9/month (billed annually; unlimited seats; 60 documents/year then $3/document) or $19/month (billed monthly)
- Free: $0/month (unlimited seats; 60 documents/year then $3/document)
- Starter: $19/seat/month (billed annually) or $29/seat/month (billed monthly)
- Business: $49/seat/month (billed annually) or $59/seat/month (billed monthly) with CPQ, workflows, and API access
- Enterprise: Custom pricing for advanced security and API features
PandaDoc’s API is frequently cited as “fantastic for custom integrations” in developer reviews. The platform works well for organizations seeking document automation capabilities beyond pure eSignature.
For teams requiring embedded white-label experiences, Verdocs’s web component approach provides component-level control over styling and behavior. Organizations building custom applications where brand consistency matters may find this architecture better suited to creating seamless user experiences.
3. Qwilr — Interactive Web-Based Proposals
Qwilr differentiates through modern, interactive web-based proposals rather than traditional PDF documents. The platform has earned a 4.6/5 rating on G2 from 870+ reviews by focusing on visual presentation and client engagement.
Core Strengths:
- Interactive web-based proposals replacing static PDFs
- Superior mobile-responsive design for excellent viewing on any device
- Native QwilrPay payment integration for collecting payments at signing
- Built-in video and multimedia embedding capabilities
- Asset library for team collaboration on content
- Real-time engagement analytics showing exactly how clients interact with proposals
Pricing Structure:
- Business: $35/user/month (billed annually) or $39/user/month (billed monthly) for interactive proposals
- Enterprise: $59/user/month (billed annually; 10-user minimum) with advanced features
- No free tier available
Qwilr excels at creating visually compelling proposals that stand out from traditional document formats. The platform’s strength lies in client-facing aesthetics and engagement tracking rather than developer tooling or embedded workflows.
Organizations primarily focused on winning deals through beautiful proposals will find Qwilr compelling. However, teams building software products that require embedded eSignature functionality will benefit from Verdocs’s API-first approach with modular web components designed for custom application development.
4. Better Proposals — Budget-Friendly Option for Small Teams
Better Proposals targets small businesses and freelancers seeking affordable proposal software with essential features. The platform maintains a 4.8/5 rating on Capterra from 160+ reviews while offering competitive entry price points among major alternatives.
Key Features:
- Professionally designed templates
- Built-in eSignature functionality
- Stripe payment integration for collecting payments
- Video embedding capabilities
- Zapier integration for workflow automation
- Simple, intuitive interface requiring minimal training
Pricing Structure:
- Starter: $19/user/month (billed annually) or $29/user/month (billed monthly)
- Premium: $29/user/month (billed annually) or $39/user/month (billed monthly) with unlimited documents
- Enterprise: $49/user/month (billed annually) or $59/user/month (billed monthly) with advanced features
Better Proposals offers an affordable entry point for teams with straightforward proposal needs. The platform relies primarily on Zapier for integrations rather than extensive native CRM connections.
Organizations requiring API access for custom development or white-label embedding capabilities will find Verdocs provides more extensive developer tooling through its JavaScript SDK and comprehensive REST APIs.
5. GetAccept — Sales Enablement with Video Messaging
GetAccept positions itself as a sales engagement platform combining proposal functionality with video messaging and live chat. The platform earned a 4.6/5 rating on G2 from 1,040+ reviews by focusing on sales team workflows.
Standout Capabilities:
- Built-in video messaging for personalized proposal delivery
- Live chat within proposals for real-time prospect communication
- Deep CRM integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot
- Advanced tracking showing engagement across all touchpoints
- Content library for sales collateral management
- Approval workflows for deal management
Pricing Structure:
- E-sign: $25/user/month for basic signing and tracking
- Professional: $49/user/month (minimum 5 users; billed annually) with full proposal features
- Enterprise: Custom pricing with 24/7 support
GetAccept serves sales teams seeking engagement tools beyond document signing. The video messaging and live chat capabilities differentiate it from pure proposal or eSignature solutions.
For development teams building applications rather than running sales processes, GetAccept’s sales-centric features add complexity without addressing core embedding requirements. Verdocs’s focus on developer experience and modular web components better serves software publishers and ISVs building custom document workflows.
6. DocuSign — Enterprise Standard for eSignature
DocuSign reports over 1 million customers and maintains recognition as an industry standard. The platform has a 4.5/5 rating on G2 from 2,550+ reviews.
Enterprise Features:
- Extensive pre-built integrations spanning major business platforms
- 99.99% uptime SLA for enterprise reliability
- Advanced security certifications including SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance
- Notary services for documents requiring notarization
- Native mobile SDKs for iOS and Android
- Multiple language SDKs including Python, C#, Java, Ruby, and PHP
Pricing Structure:
- Personal: $10/user/month
- Standard: $25/user/month (billed annually: $300/year)
- Business Pro: $40/user/month (billed annually: $480/year)
- Enhanced plans: Custom pricing (contact sales)
DocuSign’s extensive integration ecosystem and brand recognition make it a common choice for enterprise procurement. The platform’s breadth of features serves organizations with diverse eSignature needs across departments.
For software publishers and ISVs seeking to embed eSignature into their products, considerations around brand control and pricing models become important. Verdocs addresses these concerns through full white-label capability, platform pricing models, and unlimited envelope options on appropriate plans—detailed in the Verdocs vs DocuSign comparison.
The Proposify Reality: Why Teams Evaluate Alternatives
Analysis of user reviews and technical evaluations reveals consistent themes driving organizations to evaluate Proposify alternatives despite its strong market position.
Pricing Considerations: User feedback indicates that pricing concerns appear in reviews, particularly as teams scale beyond initial user counts. The per-user pricing structure accumulates quickly for larger organizations.
Technical Requirements: Reviews note PDF export and formatting challenges, particularly with complex tables and layouts. Development teams requiring programmatic document generation often need more robust API capabilities.
Customization Depth: While Proposify offers design flexibility for pricing tables, organizations building embedded experiences require component-level control over styling and behavior that proposal-centric platforms weren’t designed to provide.
Integration Architecture: Proposify offers native integrations including Salesforce and HubSpot. Teams requiring deeper integration through webhooks, custom backends, and embeddable components may find API-first platforms better suited to their architecture.
When Each Alternative Makes Sense
Choose Verdocs When:
- Building custom eSignature experiences embedded within your SaaS product
- Requiring complete white-label control with no vendor branding
- Needing platform or ISV pricing models for reselling capabilities
- Working within the Microsoft ecosystem (Teams, Dynamics 365, Power Platform)
- Prioritizing API-first architecture with web component flexibility
- Seeking rapid proof-of-concept workflows with ready-to-use components
Choose Proposify When:
- Focused on sales proposal creation with content library management
- Needing interactive pricing tables and approval workflows
- Requiring native Salesforce or HubSpot integrations
- Prioritizing proposal-specific templates and team collaboration features
Choose PandaDoc When:
- Seeking document automation beyond proposals including CPQ functionality
- Wanting a free tier to evaluate basic eSignature needs
- Requiring strong API access alongside proposal capabilities
- Needing workflow automation across contract lifecycle
Choose Qwilr When:
- Prioritizing visual presentation and interactive proposal design
- Wanting web-based proposals rather than traditional PDF format
- Needing integrated payment collection through QwilrPay
- Focused on client engagement tracking and analytics
Choose Better Proposals When:
- Operating with limited budget and straightforward proposal needs
- Requiring quick setup without technical complexity
- Working as a small team or freelancer
- Needing basic eSignature without advanced workflow requirements
Choose DocuSign When:
- Requiring maximum brand recognition for enterprise sales processes
- Needing a broad integration ecosystem
- Requiring native mobile SDKs for iOS and Android
- Working in regulated industries requiring specific compliance certifications
Integration Capabilities Comparison
Integration depth varies significantly across platforms, impacting how solutions fit within existing technology stacks.
Microsoft Ecosystem:
- Verdocs: Native Teams, Dynamics 365, Power Platform integration as the first fully embeddable solution in Microsoft Commercial Cloud
- DocuSign: Extensive Microsoft integration through marketplace apps
- PandaDoc: Basic Microsoft connectivity
- Proposify, Qwilr, Better Proposals, GetAccept: Limited or no native Microsoft integration
CRM Connectivity:
All platforms offer some level of CRM integration, with Proposify and PandaDoc providing comprehensive native connectors to Salesforce and HubSpot. Better Proposals relies primarily on Zapier for integrations.
Developer Tools:
- Verdocs: REST APIs, JavaScript SDK (isomorphic for browser/Node.js), extensive webhooks
- DocuSign: Multiple language SDKs (Python, C#, Java, Ruby, PHP), comprehensive API
- PandaDoc: Strong API with developer documentation
- Proposify: API available on Business plans
- Qwilr, Better Proposals, GetAccept: Basic API capabilities
For real estate teams, legal departments, and financial services organizations requiring industry-specific workflows, Verdocs provides targeted solutions combining embeddable components with compliance requirements.
Security and Compliance Considerations
Document security and legal compliance remain critical evaluation criteria across all platforms.
Verdocs Security Framework:
- PKI digital signatures using 2048 RSA encryption
- SOC 2 Type 1 certified with attestation reports upon request
- E-SIGN Act and UETA compliant signatures
- Documents encrypted at rest and in transit
- Encryption keys stored in secure Hardware Security Modules (HSMs)
- Physical infrastructure hosted on Amazon AWS and Microsoft Azure
- Comprehensive audit trails with IP addresses, timestamps, and authentication methods
- Multi-factor authentication options including KBA, SMS, PIN-based access, and in-person signing
Competitor Certifications:
- Proposify: SOC-2, GDPR, PCI-DSS compliance
- DocuSign: SOC-2, HIPAA compliance, additional enterprise certifications
- PandaDoc: SOC-2 certification
Organizations operating in the U.S. market should verify E-SIGN Act and UETA compliance across any platform under consideration. For accounting and insurance use cases with specific regulatory requirements, Verdocs’s bring-your-own-certificate capability through modular HSM support provides additional control over signing credentials.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main advantages of an API-first eSignature platform like Verdocs over traditional tools like Proposify?
API-first platforms like Verdocs provide developers with modular web components that integrate directly into custom applications, offering full control over styling and user experience. Traditional proposal tools like Proposify are designed for end-users creating standalone documents rather than developers building embedded workflows. Verdocs’s 60+ web components with native React, Angular, and Vue wrappers enable teams to build bespoke signing experiences matching their exact UX requirements, while proposal-centric platforms typically offer more limited customization for embedded use cases.
Can Verdocs be fully white-labeled to match our company’s branding?
Yes, Verdocs offers complete white-label capability that extends beyond basic logo placement. Organizations gain full control over email templates, embed styling, and can eliminate vendor branding throughout the signing experience. Additionally, Verdocs’s modular HSM support allows organizations to bring their own signing certificates rather than using vendor-provided credentials—a unique capability that ensures complete brand consistency even in the signed document certificates. This white-label depth serves ISVs and software publishers who need their customers to experience document signing as a native feature of their product.
Does Verdocs offer a freemium plan for developers to test its features?
Verdocs provides a freemium Basic Plan with no credit card required, including 25 envelopes per month and 5 templates with unlimited test documents. This allows developers to fully evaluate and prototype solutions before committing to paid plans. The free tier provides full platform access rather than a limited trial period, enabling teams to build and validate proof-of-concept implementations without financial commitment. For production deployments, Pro Plan and platform pricing options scale with organizational needs.
What kind of integrations does Verdocs offer, especially for Microsoft ecosystem users?
Verdocs provides REST APIs, JavaScript SDKs, and embeddable web components supporting integration with virtually any modern web framework. For Microsoft ecosystem users, Verdocs is positioned as the first fully embeddable, end-to-end eSignature solution for Microsoft Commercial Cloud. This includes native connectors for Microsoft Power Automate enabling low-code workflow creation, embedded experiences within Microsoft Teams, and integration with Dynamics 365 Business Central and Customer Engagement applications. These Microsoft integrations are available through Microsoft AppSource.
How does Verdocs ensure the security and legal compliance of eSignatures?
All electronic signatures through Verdocs are E-SIGN Act and UETA compliant, ensuring legal validity for documents signed within the United States. Verdocs uses best-in-class implementation of digital signatures and tamper-proof seals to ensure document integrity, with Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) digital certificates creating public and private certificates for identity verification. Documents signed on Verdocs are encrypted with a 2048 RSA private key stored in a secure Hardware Security Module (HSM). The platform is SOC 2 Type 1 certified with attestation reports available upon request, and provides comprehensive audit trails capturing when and where documents were signed, and by whom.
Are there any considerations when comparing Verdocs to larger competitors like DocuSign?
Verdocs focuses specifically on the embeddable eSignature market for developers and software publishers, offering capabilities like full white-label control, web components for major frameworks, and platform pricing models that serve different use cases than traditional eSignature vendors. DocuSign provides an extensive integration ecosystem and native mobile SDKs for iOS and Android. Organizations should evaluate based on their primary use case: teams building embedded document workflows into custom applications will benefit from Verdocs’s API-first architecture, while organizations primarily seeking standalone eSignature with maximum brand recognition may evaluate DocuSign. The Verdocs comparison page provides detailed feature analysis to help teams make informed decisions.